ABSTRACT
The effect of irradiation during computed tomography (CT) imaging on implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) has not been fully evaluated in various settings. The purposes of this study were to evaluate the occurrence of electromagnetic interference (EMI) during CT irradiation in various clinically available ICDs with phantom experiments and to determine the potential risks related to irradiation during CT imaging. Five types of clinically available ICDs from five manufacturers were tested. An ICD was combined with an electrocardiogram (ECG) simulator, mounted in a chest phantom, and subjected to CT imaging. Each ICD was irradiated at the maximal power level (tube voltage, 135 kVp; tube current, 510 mA; rotation time, 1.5 s). EMI was defined as oversensing, ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation (VT/VF) detection, noise, or shock delivery during CT imaging. For ICDs in which EMI was observed, EMI was then evaluated under 144 different irradiation conditions (tube voltage [four patterns from 80-135 kVp], tube current [six patterns from 50-550 mA], and rotation time [six patterns from 0.35-1.5 s]). Testing was also performed during irradiation at the typical doses in three clinical settings and in two settings with inappropriate irradiation of ICDs due to incorrect setup. Among the five ICDs, a shock was delivered by one ICD manufactured by Medtronic (Minneapolis, MN, USA) due to oversensing during irradiation, which occurred at the maximal power level. No oversensing was observed in other ICDs. In the malfunctioned ICD, oversensing was observed in 134 of 144 irradiation patterns, even at a low power in the ICD. The VF-detection criterion was fulfilled in 20 of 134 tests and was significantly associated with tube voltage, tube current, ration time, and tube voltage × rotation time interaction. Although oversensing was observed in three clinical settings (typical chest CT, CT coronary angiography after coronary artery bypass graft, and dynamic assessment for pleural tumors) and one situation during an incorrect scan range on the chest for head perfusion CT, they were not recognized as tachycardia beats. Oversensing was observed when scans were incorrectly set over the ICD during bolus tracking of contrast-enhanced CT. Maximal power CT imaging induced VT/VF detection and shock delivery in one model of ICD placed in a chest phantom. VT/VF detection was observed when tube voltages were high and irradiation times were longer. Oversensing can occur during inappropriate CT imaging, particularly when slices are positioned over the ICD.
ABSTRACT
We retrospectively investigated the success rate of pulmonary arteriovenous separation in a single-phase computed tomography (CT) protocol using the estimated time of arrival (ETA) method. A total of 223 patients who underwent a single-phase CT protocol using the ETA method for pulmonary arteriovenous separation were included in the analysis. Dual source CT (SOMATOM Force, SIEMENS) was used for imaging. The tube voltage was 80 kVp, and the scan mode was turbo flash spiral mode. CT values of main pulmonary artery (MPA), peripheral pulmonary artery (pPA), peripheral pulmonary vein (pPV), left atrium (LA), ascending aorta (AAo) and descending aorta (DAo) were measured. When the difference in CT values on the central side was 100 Hounsfield unit (HU) or more, it was judged that the separation was successful. The mean CT values were 671.9±154 HU for MPA, 424.4±81.2 HU for LA, 551.1±142.6 HU for pPA, 351.6±94.0 HU for pPV, 362.2±75.8 HU for AAo, and 282.7±83.7 HU for DAo. The mean difference in CT values of the pulmonary artery and vein was 247.5±138.9 HU on the central side and 199.5±133.0 HU on the peripheral side. There were 90.1% of cases where the difference in CT values on the central side was 100 HU or more. In addition, a strong positive correlation (r=0.849, p<0.001) was found between the CT value of MPA and the CT value difference on the central side. The success rate of pulmonary arteriovenous separation by the ETA method, which is a method that enables stable pulmonary arteriovenous separation, was 90.1%.
