ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Organ procurement organizations (OPOs) operate under the premise that Americans would donate organs and/or tissue if placed in appropriate circumstances. This study evaluated opinions of Pennsylvania trauma surgeons regarding OPOs and organ donation. METHODS: Ninety-six Pennsylvania trauma surgeons were surveyed and descriptive results calculated. RESULTS: Ninety percent were familiar with criteria for organ donation, and about 76% would invoke their institution's brain death policy even if families did not desire to donate organs. A small portion did not routinely pronounce patients brain dead that met criteria. One fourth indicated trauma surgeons should have no role in requesting organs. A majority believed trauma surgeons should have a role in organ donation requests, either alone or with an OPO representative, and most indicated that they could influence a family's decision. CONCLUSION: Requestor attitude is important, and our results show an overall positive attitude toward donation and a solid level of knowledge regarding donor eligibility. Hospital development programs to improve donation consent should emphasize decoupling of brain death discussion and donation request, work to improve staff attitudes about approaching patients, and address donor eligibility criteria.
Subject(s)
Attitude of Health Personnel , Tissue Donors , Traumatology , Adult , Brain Death , Data Collection , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pennsylvania , Physician's Role , Tissue and Organ ProcurementABSTRACT
Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) seroprevalence rates among rural trauma patients range between 0.15 and 1.32 per cent. A random sample of trauma patients treated at our rural trauma center between September 1994 and November 1995 was enrolled into a blind HIV serosurvey. Five hundred sixty-six of 1315 trauma patients (43%) were tested. Two of the 566 patients (0.35%) were HIV positive. A review of aggregate data for HIV infection among rural trauma patients in the United States show that 28 of the 4639 patients (0.60%) are HIV positive. We conclude that there was a low HIV incidence among our trauma patients from September 1994 to November 1995, and the cost-effectiveness of HIV testing for rural trauma patients is questionable with incidences between 0.5 and 1.0 per cent.
Subject(s)
HIV Infections/epidemiology , HIV Seroprevalence , Rural Population/statistics & numerical data , Wounds and Injuries/epidemiology , AIDS Serodiagnosis/economics , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Female , HIV Seropositivity/epidemiology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Sampling Studies , United States/epidemiologyABSTRACT
Few studies compare complications of continuous and bolus epidural analgesia. Ninety-eight postoperative and trauma patients receiving epidural infusions over 15 months were retrospectively studied. Continuous epidural analgesia was used for pain management in 60 patients (61%). Bolus epidural analgesia was administered to 38 patients (39%). Sixty patients reported 98 complications. Sixty-eight per cent of complications occurred in patients receiving continuous infusions. For the continuous infusions, motor blockade (18%), nausea/vomiting, (18%), and catheter leaks (12%) were the most common complications. For bolus infusions, nausea/vomiting (25%), mental status changes (21%), and erythema at placement site (13%) were encountered. Continuous infusions were associated with an increased incidence of complications compared with bolus infusions (P < 0.05). Patients undergoing abdominal surgery had an increased incidence of complications compared with other patients (P < 0.05). Epidural catheters are safe and effective for pain management, but they are not without risk. Hemodynamic stability and pulmonary status should be considered when evaluating patients.
