Four-year overall survival update from the phase III HIMALAYA study of tremelimumab plus durvalumab in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: In the phase III HIMALAYA study (NCT03298451) in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC), STRIDE (Single Tremelimumab Regular Interval Durvalumab) significantly improved overall survival (OS) versus sorafenib; durvalumab monotherapy was noninferior to sorafenib for OS. Results reported herein are from a 4-year updated OS analysis of HIMALAYA. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Participants with uHCC and no previous systemic treatment were randomized to STRIDE (n = 393), durvalumab (n = 389), or sorafenib (n = 389). The updated data cut-off was 23 January 2023. OS and serious adverse events (AEs) were assessed. Additionally, baseline characteristics and subsequent therapies were analyzed in long-term survivors (≥36 months beyond randomization). RESULTS: For STRIDE, durvalumab, and sorafenib, median [95% confidence interval (CI)] follow-up was 49.12 months (46.95-50.17 months), 48.46 months (46.82-49.81 months), and 47.31 months (45.08-49.15 months), respectively. OS hazard ratio (95% CI) for STRIDE versus sorafenib was 0.78 (0.67-0.92). The 36-month OS rate for STRIDE was 30.7% versus 19.8% for sorafenib. The 48-month OS rate remained higher for STRIDE at 25.2%, versus 15.1% for sorafenib. The long-term OS benefit of STRIDE was observed across clinically relevant subgroups and was further improved in participants who achieved disease control. Long-term survivors with STRIDE (n = 103) included participants across clinically relevant subgroups, and 57.3% (59/103) had no reported subsequent anticancer therapy. No new serious treatment-related AEs occurred with STRIDE from the primary analysis (17.5%; 68/388). Durvalumab maintained OS noninferiority to sorafenib and no late-onset safety signals were identified. CONCLUSIONS: These data represent the longest follow-up to date in phase III studies in uHCC. The unprecedented 3- and 4-year OS rates reinforce the sustained long-term OS benefit of STRIDE versus sorafenib. STRIDE maintained a tolerable yet differentiated safety profile from other current uHCC therapies. Results continue to support the long-term benefits of STRIDE in a diverse population, reflective of uHCC globally.

Durvalumab with or without tremelimumab versus the EXTREME regimen as first-line treatment for recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: KESTREL, a randomized, open-label, phase III study.

BACKGROUND: Patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M HNSCC) have a poor prognosis. The phase III KESTREL study evaluated the efficacy of durvalumab [programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) antibody] with or without tremelimumab [cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4) antibody], versus the EXTREME regimen in patients with R/M HNSCC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with HNSCC who had not received prior systemic treatment for R/M disease were randomized (2 : 1 : 1) to receive durvalumab 1500 mg every 4 weeks (Q4W) plus tremelimumab 75 mg Q4W (up to four doses), durvalumab monotherapy 1500 mg Q4W, or the EXTREME regimen (platinum, 5-fluorouracil, and cetuximab) until disease progression. Durvalumab efficacy, with or without tremelimumab, versus the EXTREME regimen in patients with PD-L1-high tumors and in all randomized patients was assessed. Safety was also assessed. RESULTS: Durvalumab and durvalumab plus tremelimumab were not superior to EXTREME for overall survival (OS) in patients with PD-L1-high expression [median, 10.9 and 11.2 versus 10.9 months, respectively; hazard ratio (HR) = 0.96; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.69-1.32; P = 0.787 and HR = 1.05; 95% CI 0.80-1.39, respectively]. Durvalumab and durvalumab plus tremelimumab prolonged duration of response versus EXTREME (49.3% and 48.1% versus 9.8% of patients remaining in response at 12 months), correlating with long-term OS for responding patients; however, median progression-free survival was longer with EXTREME (2.8 and 2.8 versus 5.4 months). Exploratory analyses suggested that subsequent immunotherapy use by 24.3% of patients in the EXTREME regimen arm contributed to the similar OS outcomes between arms. Grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) for durvalumab, durvalumab plus tremelimumab, and EXTREME were 8.9%, 19.1%, and 53.1%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with PD-L1-high expression, OS was comparable between durvalumab and the EXTREME regimen. Durvalumab alone, and with tremelimumab, demonstrated durable responses and reduced TRAEs versus the EXTREME regimen in R/M HNSCC.

Protease inhibitors restore radiation-induced apoptosis to Bcl-2-expressing lymphoma cells.

The proteasome pathway is important for the turnover of many regulatory proteins. This pathway has recently become a target for antitumor agents and several research groups have demonstrated that inhibitors with specificities for the proteasome are potent apoptosis-inducing agents. Many mechanisms by which proteasome inhibitors exert their effects have been suggested, including inhibition of NF-kappa B activity and stabilization of the p53 tumor suppressor protein. We investigated the ability of inhibitors with specificities for the proteasome and for another protein degradation enzyme, calpain, to sensitize a murine B-cell lymphoma with constitutive NF-kappa B1 homodimer activity and high expression of Bcl-2 protein to radiation-induced apoptosis. Protease inhibitors tested were calpain inhibitor I, calpain inhibitor II, calpeptin, MG132, and Lactacystin. All five inhibitors induced apoptosis and sensitized cells to radiation despite the maintenance of Bcl-2 protein levels throughout the course of treatment. An electrophoretic migration shift assay for NF-kappa B1 activity provided evidence that reversal of NF-kappa B activity was not required for induction of cell death; however, p53 levels were elevated for all inhibitors tested. HL-60 cells, devoid of p53, could not be sensitized to radiation by MG132 treatment, suggesting that p53 was important for cell death induced by combined treatment with protease inhibitors and radiation. We concluded that protease inhibitors are capable of overcoming the protective effects of Bcl-2 to induce apoptosis and suggest that protease inhibitor treatment, when combined with ionizing radiation, leads to p53-mediated apoptosis.

NF-kappaB1 (p50) homodimers contribute to transcription of the bcl-2 oncogene.

The bcl-2 proto-oncogene is frequently expressed in human cancer. Although bcl-2 was first cloned as the t(14;18) translocation breakpoint from human follicular B-cell lymphoma, it has become apparent that many cell types express bcl-2 because of transcriptional regulation. As such, several transcription factors have been demonstrated to activate expression of bcl-2, including NF-kappaB. We investigated the role of NF-kappaB1 (p50) homodimers in the expression of Bcl-2 in two murine B-cell lymphoma cell lines: LY-as, an apoptosis-proficient line with low Bcl-2 protein expression and no nuclear NF-kappaB activity, and LY-ar, a nonapoptotic line with constitutive p50 homodimer activity and 30 times more Bcl-2 protein expression than LY-as. We found that nuclear p50 homodimer activity correlated with Bcl-2 expression in these cell types and identified several sites within the bcl-2 5'-flanking region that p50 was capable of binding. In vitro transcription revealed that recombinant p50 enhanced the production of run-off transcripts from the bcl-2 P1 promoter. Additional in vitro transcription experiments suggested the sites by which p50 afforded this effect. We conclude that the p50 homodimer is capable of transcriptional activation of the bcl-2 gene and suggest that its nuclear activity contributes to the expression of bcl-2 in LY-ar cells.