What is the meaning of provoked spasm phenotypes by vasoreactivity testing?

Coronary artery epicardial spasm is involved in the pathogenesis of many cardiac disorders. Vasoreactivity testing, such as intracoronary injection of acetylcholine (ACH) or ergonovine (ER), is the gold standard method for the diagnosis of vasospastic angina. Provoked epicardial spasm phenotypes are classified as focal spasm and diffuse spasm. Multiple factors, including sex, ethnicity, and use of coronary vasoactive stimulators, are related to the provoked phenotypes of epicardial spasm. Diffuse-provoked spasm is often observed in females, where focal-provoked spasm is markedly more common in males. ACH provokes more diffuse and distal spasms, whereas ER induces more focal and proximal spasms. Yellow plaque and coronary thrombi are often observed in lesions with focal spasms, and intimal thickness with a sonolucent zone is significantly more common in lesions with focal spasm. Furthermore, clinical outcomes in patients with focal spasm are unsatisfactory compared with those in patients with diffuse spasm. However, the reproducibility and eternality of provoked spasm phenotypes by vasoreactivity testing is uncertain. Coronary atherosclerosis or endothelial damage may affect coronary vasomotor tone. Although coronary artery spasm may persist in the same coronary artery, provoked coronary spasm phenotypes may exhibit a momentary coronary reaction by intracoronary ACH or ER testing.

Clinical Outcomes and Provoked Epicardial Spasm Phenotypes via Intracoronary Acetylcholine Testing in 680 Patients with Angina and Nonobstructive Coronary Arteries.

Background: Epicardial spasm (ES) phenotypes may be related to the prognosis in patients with coronary spastic angina. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to elucidate the relationship between angiographic coronary vasomotor responses to intracoronary acetylcholine (ACh) injection and prognosis in patients with angina and nonobstructive coronary artery disease (ANOCAD). Methods: This was a retrospective, observational, single-center study of 680 patients with ANOCAD. ACh spasm provocation tests on both coronary arteries were performed without administering nitroglycerine to relieve provoked spasm in a first-attempt artery. ACh was injected in incremental doses of 20/50/100/200 µg into the left coronary artery and 20/50/80 µg into the right coronary artery. Positive ES was defined as ≥90% stenosis and usual chest pain and ischemic ECG changes. Results: Provoked positive ES was observed in 310 patients (46%), including 85 patients (13%) with focal spasm, 150 patients (22%) with diffuse spasm, and 75 patients (11%) with combined spasm (diffuse spasm and focal spasm), whereas the remaining 370 patients (54%) had no provoked spasm. An unclassified ACh test was observed in 186 patients (27%), while 184 patients (27%) had a complete negative ACh test. The clinical outcomes in patients with complete negative ES were satisfactory compared with those with positive ES and unclassified ACh test results. The prognosis in patients with an unclassified ACh test was not different from those with a positive ES. Furthermore, prognosis in patients with ES phenotypes was not different among the three groups. Conclusions: There was no correlation between provoked ES phenotypes via intracoronary ACh testing and prognosis in patients with ANOCAD; however, clinical outcomes in patients with positive ES and unclassified ACh tests were worse compared to those with complete negative ACh tests. We should focus on the treatments in patients with unclassified ACh tests as well as those with ESs.