Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Gynecol Oncol Rep ; 38: 100879, 2021 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34926760

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Vaginal cancer is rare, accounting for only about 2% of all cancers of the female reproductive organs, and it is a disease that is rarely encountered in routine clinical practice. Vaginal cancer is mainly treated with radiation therapy or concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT). However, in stage I-II cases, when the lesion is confined to the upper third of the vagina, surgical treatment may include total hysterectomy and vaginal resection with an adequate resection margin. We report a case of stage I vaginal cancer diagnosed at 13 weeks of gestation. There are very few reports on the diagnosis and treatment of vaginal cancer during pregnancy, and it was difficult to decide on a treatment plan; therefore, we report on the course of treatment followed for this patient. CASE PRESENTATION: The patient was a 38-year-old woman with a history of two pregnancies and zero births. The patient had thrombocytopenia and was diagnosed highly suspicious of myelodysplastic syndrome by bone marrow biopsy, and her platelet count remained at approximately 50,000/µL. At the time of the 11-week gestational checkup, a 4-cm pedunculated tumor was found in the right posterior vaginal fornix. Transvaginal tumor resection was performed at 13 weeks of gestation, and the patient was diagnosed with stage I vaginal cancer (squamous cell carcinoma). Because vaginal cancer was confined to the posterior vaginal wall fornix, radical surgery after abortion was suggested as a treatment plan. However, the patient strongly desired to continue the pregnancy, so the policy was to continue the pregnancy and follow-up. However, at 22 weeks of gestation, a recurrent tumor was found in the posterior fornix of the vagina. The lesion had invaded the paravaginal tissue, making radical surgery impossible. At 26 weeks of gestation, an elective cesarean section was performed because of giving priority to early therapeutic intervention to her recurrent vaginal cancer, and it was decided that CCRT with cisplatin would be administered from postpartum day 1. However, because of thrombocytopenia, chemotherapy could not be co-administered, and the treatment was completed with radiation alone. The therapeutic effect was partial response, but 13 weeks after the end of radiation therapy, we observed regrowth of the recurrent tumor and emergence of pelvic lymph node metastasis. The patient received palliative treatment but died 8 months after delivery due to a generally deteriorating condition, sepsis, and disseminated intravascular coagulation. CONCLUSIONS: In cases of malignant tumors associated with pregnancy, treatment policies should consider the perinatal prognosis at the same time as treatment for malignant tumors, and gynecologic oncologists, obstetricians, and neonatologists, from the standpoint of their respective specialties, should thoroughly discuss the "curative effect of treatment for malignant tumors" and the "prognosis of the child after birth" and consider the treatment plan for each case.

2.
J Med Case Rep ; 15(1): 165, 2021 Mar 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33773600

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Mixed gonadal dysgenesis (MGD) is a subtype of the disorders of sex development (DSD) associated with sex chromosome abnormalities characterized by abnormal external genitalia, short stature, and primary amenorrhea. This disease is generally diagnosed from the neonatal stage to early childhood, and by puberty at the latest. Cases that are phenotypically female or those with ambiguous genitalia experience a high risk of gonadal tumor formation. As tumor risk is known to increase with age, prophylactic bilateral gonadectomy is recommended following early diagnosis. CASE PRESENTATION: Here we report a case of an adult Japanese woman diagnosed with MGD during treatment for a giant pelvic tumor. The patient initially visited a gynecology clinic during puberty for primary amenorrhea, at which time an abnormality was found with the external genitalia. However, a diagnosis of MGD was not made at this time, resulting in the development of a malignant gonadal germ cell tumor in adulthood. CONCLUSIONS: For early diagnosis of MGD and the prevention of gonadal tumor formation, it is essential that gynecologists fully understand MGD and other DSD.


Subject(s)
Gonadal Dysgenesis, Mixed , Neoplasms, Germ Cell and Embryonal , Urogenital Abnormalities , Adult , Amenorrhea/etiology , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Neoplasms, Germ Cell and Embryonal/diagnosis
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...