Effect of the brain-derived neurotrophic factor gene Val66Met polymorphism on sensory-motor integration during a complex motor learning exercise.

The brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) gene Val66Met polymorphism may cause impairment in short-term motor learning by reducing activity-dependent BDNF expression, which causes alterations in synaptic plasticity by changing glutamatergic and GABAergic synaptic transmissions. Sensory-motor integration (SMI) plays an important role in motor learning. In this study, we investigated the role of this polymorphism on SMI during a complex motor learning practice. Forty-three healthy participants performed standardized 5-day basketball shooting exercises under supervision. Electrophysiologic SMI studies were performed before the first day exercise (T0) and after the first and fifth day exercises (T1 and T2, respectively). SMI was studied using electrical median nerve stimulation at the wrist, followed by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of the contralateral motor cortex with various inter-stimulus intervals (ISIs). Recordings were made from the thenar and forearm flexor muscles. Participants were divided into two groups according to their BDNF genotype. Group 1 consisted of 26 subjects with the Val66Val genotype and group 2 included 17 subjects with the BDNF Met allele. Group 2 had a lower increase in basketball scores at day 5. Moreover, they had higher afferent facilitation for the responses recorded from both thenar and forearm flexor muscles at T1, but these changes could not be maintained until T2. This non-persistent early hyper-responsivity of the sensory-motor cortex in subjects with the BDNF Met allele might be explained by a transient upsurge of cortical excitability to compensate the insufficient cortical plasticity during motor learning, which could be considered as a sign of lower performance in motor skill learning.

Endocan, a novel marker of endothelial dysfunction in patients with essential hypertension: comparative effects of amlodipine and valsartan.

Vascular inflammation plays an important role in the pathophysiology of hypertension and high levels of endocan may reflect ongoing vascular inflammation in hypertensive patients. In the present hypothesis-generating study, we aimed at investigating the comparative effects of amlodipine and valsartan on endocan levels in newly diagnosed hypertensive patients. The study population consisted of 37 untreated hypertensive patients who were randomized to the two treatment arms. After baseline assessment, each patient was randomly allocated to either 10 mg daily of amlodipine (n = 18, 7 males) or 160 mg daily of valsartan (n = 19, 3 males) and treated for a 3-month period. Sphygmomanometric blood pressure (BP) and serum endocan were measured before and every 2 weeks during drug treatment. There was no statistically significant difference between the two treatment arms as far as baseline socio-demographic and clinical characteristics are concerned. After a 3-month treatment period, systolic and diastolic BP values significantly reduced by antihypertensive treatment (p < 0.001). Furthermore, endocan levels were significantly decreased in both treatment arms (p < 0.05). However, amlodipine caused a greater percent decrease in circulating endocan levels compared with valsartan at the end of the treatment period. Both drugs reduced high sensitivity C-reactive protein values. However, the statistical significant difference vs baseline was achieved only in the group treated with amlodipine. No correlation was found between endocan plasma levels and BP reduction. The results of this hypothesis-generating study suggest that amlodipine and valsartan decrease endocan levels in newly diagnosed hypertensive patients. The effects, which are more evident with amlodipine, may contribute to the anti-inflammatory effects exerted by the two drugs on the vascular target.