Perceptions of family medicine among long-term patients of a family medicine clinic in Japan: a mixed-methods study.

OBJECTIVES: To examine the perceptions of family medicine among patients attending a family medicine clinic for over 10 years in Japan and explore the unique characteristics of a family medicine which was developed in the local community in northern Japan. DESIGN: Explanatory, sequential mixed-method design comprising a survey by questionnaires and semistructured interviews. SETTING: The study was conducted at one of the oldest family medicine primary care clinics in Japan. We surveyed and interviewed participants from November 2019 to March 2020. PARTICIPANTS: 144 patients who have attended a family medicine clinic since April 2009 completed the questionnaires. Semistructured interviews with nine participants were conducted. RESULTS: Among the respondents, 131 (91%) reported having attended a family medicine clinic. In terms of their perceptions of what 'family physicians' do, 42 (35%) stated 'a doctor who treats various diseases with a general view', 34 (29%) stated 'a doctor who treats outpatients and visit patients' houses', and 15 (13%) stated 'a doctor whom one can consult for anything and is familiar with one's family and lifestyle'. The results of the qualitative analysis revealed two themes with regard to patients' perceptions of family medicine: 'seeing the whole person and referring suitably' and 'medical care at home'. Patients' perceptions of family medicine identified in the quantitative study were strongly associated with the characteristics extracted from the qualitative study. CONCLUSION: Patients attending the family medicine clinic had clear perceptions of what family physicians do. The two major perceptions of the characteristics of family medicine were identified as 'seeing the whole person and referring suitably' and 'medical care at home'.

Asian perspectives on NAPCRG.

This is a short communication to reflect on experiences at North American Primary Care Research Group (NAPCRG) conference from the perspective of Asian family physicians. They feel that NAPCRG can play an important role to level up the skills and talents in countries with less-established primary care research capacity and capability. NAPCRG should not be restricted to networking functions for only North America, Europe and Oceania but should include Asia, South America and Africa. These international academic networks will strengthen primary care research in the world.

Association between physicians' and patients' perspectives of shared decision making in primary care settings in Japan: The impact of environmental factors.

PURPOSE: Shared decision-making (SDM) has only lately begun attaining recognition from the Japanese medical community. The purpose of this study was to create a Japanese version of the SDM-Q-Doc, which is a scale that measures SDM from the perspective of physicians, and to clarify its psychometric characteristics and identify the issues and factors that affect SDM. METHODS: The participants were 23 physicians and 130 patients who visited primary care clinics in Japan for the first time. Immediately following physician-patient interviews, the Japanese version of SDM-Q-9 and SDM-Q-Doc were administered to patients and physicians, respectively. For convergent validity, physician confidence in the medical interview (PCMI) was used. After the determination of internal consistency and validity of the SDM-Q-Doc, the relations among each item of SDM-Q-Doc, SDM-Q-9, physicians' sociodemographic attributes, and a presence or absence of nurse's attendance during outpatient consultation were assessed by a multiple regression analysis and structural equation modeling (SEM). RESULTS: A factor analysis confirmed that the Japanese version of the SDM-Q-Doc displays a one-factor structure with a high internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.87, ω = 0.88). The correlation between the PCMI and SDM-Q-Doc confirmed an appropriate convergent validity (r = 0.406; p < 0.001). Multiple regression analyses showed that the attendance of a nurse during consultation significantly affected one item of the SDM-Q-Doc, which in turn affected one item of the SDM-Q-9. SEM showed a good fit of model for these three items. CONCLUSION: The Japanese version of the SDM-Q-Doc's internal consistency and validity in the outpatient medical consultations in Japan were confirmed. Further, this study suggests the role of a nurse's attendance during a physician-patient consultation on facilitating the SDM. Further, using the Japanese version of the SDM-Q-Doc will promote communication skills training for medical professionals by checking the quality of SDM.

Psychometric Evaluation of the Japanese 9-Item Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire and Its Association with Decision Conflict and Patient Factors in Japanese Primary Care.

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to verify the internal consistency and validity of the Japanese version of the 9-item Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9) and investigate the association among patient factors, shared decision-making experienced by patients, and patients' decision conflict during the treatment decision process in primary outpatient settings in Japan. METHODS: Patients who visited a primary care outpatient unit for the first time and completed the Japanese version of SDM-Q-9 and the Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS) immediately after consultation were included. The internal consistency of SDM-Q-9 was assessed using Cronbach's alpha coefficient. Factor analysis and structural equation modeling were used to investigate structural construct validity. The relationship among patient-perceived experiences of shared decision-making, decision conflict, and patient factors was evaluated using correlation analysis. RESULTS: A total of 131 patients with chronic diseases (55.0% females, 28.2% aged ≥ 70 years) were included in this analysis. Cronbach's alpha for the Japanese version of SDM-Q-9 was 0.917, indicating a high degree of internal consistency. Confirmatory factor analysis indicated that the Japanese version of SDM-Q-9 had a one-factor structure. Spearman's rank correlation analysis indicated that the correlation between SDM-Q-9 and DCS was -0.577 (p < 0.05), indicating a significant inverse correlation and convergent validity. Older age was positively associated with perceived support of the physician in understanding all information. CONCLUSIONS: We confirmed that the Japanese version of SDM-Q-9 was both reliable and valid for use in Japanese primary care settings. In addition, we found a clear association between shared decision-making and decisional conflict of patients.

Mixed methods study protocol to examine perceptions of family medicine among long-term patients of a family medicine clinic in Japan.

INTRODUCTION: Family physicians or general practitioners play central roles in many countries' primary care systems, but family medicine (FM) remains relatively unestablished in Japan. Previous studies in Japan have examined the general population's understanding of FM as a medical specialty, but none have explored this topic using actual FM clinic patients. Here, we describe a protocol to explore the perceptions of FM among long-term patients of one of Japan's oldest FM clinics. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The study will be conducted at the Motowanishi Family Clinic in Hokkaido, Japan, using patients who have attended the clinic for over 10 years. The analysis will adopt a two-phase explanatory sequential mixed methods design. During phase I, quantitative data from participants' medical records will be collected and reviewed, and patients' perceptions of FM will be assessed through a questionnaire. The correlations between participants' knowledge that the clinic specialises in FM and various characteristics will be examined. In phase II, qualitative data will be collected through semi-structured interviews of approximately 10 participants selected using maximum variation sampling based on phase I results. A thematic analysis will be conducted in phase II to identify patients' perceptions and changes in perceptions. Finally, each theme identified in phase II will be transformed into a quantitative variable to analyse the relationships between the phases. A joint display will be used to integrate the phases' findings and examine how phase II results explain phase I results. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The institutional review board of the Japan Primary Care Association has approved this research (2019-003). The results will be presented at the association's annual academic meeting and submitted for publication in relevant journals. The findings will also be provided to the patients via the clinic's internal newsletter.

Multicentre descriptive cross-sectional study of Japanese home visit patients: reasons for encounter, health problems and multimorbidity.

BACKGROUND: GP in Japan are encouraged to conduct home visits for older adults. However, most previous studies on home visits were based on secondary analyses of billing data that did not include reasons for the encounter. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to describe home visit care by GP in Japan, including reasons for encounter, health problems, episodes of care, comprehensiveness and multimorbidity. METHODS: This multicentre descriptive cross-sectional study used the International Classification of Primary Care, second edition, and was conducted in Japan from 1 October 2016 to 31 March 2017. Participants were patients who received home visits from 10 enrolled GPs working in urban and rural areas across Japan. The main outcome measures were reasons for encounter, health problems and multimorbidity. RESULTS: Of 253 potential patient participants, 250 were included in this analysis; 92.4% were aged 65 years and older. We registered 1,278 regular home visits and 110 emergency home visits. The top three reasons for encounters home visits were associated with cardiovascular and gastrointestinal disorders: prescriptions for cardiovascular diseases (n = 796), medical examination/health evaluation for cardiovascular diseases (n = 758) and prescriptions for gastrointestinal problems (n = 554). About 50% of patients had multimorbidity. Cardiovascular, endocrine and neuropsychological diseases were the most frequent problems in patients with multimorbidity. CONCLUSIONS: The main reasons for encounter were prescriptions for chronic conditions. Emergency visits accounted for 8% of all visits. Around half of the patients had multimorbidity. This information may help GPs and policy makers to better assess home visit patients' needs.

Universal health coverage and primary care, Thailand.

Thailand's policy on universal health coverage (UHC) has made good progress since its inception in 2002. Every Thai citizen is now entitled to essential preventive, curative and palliative health services at all life stages. Like its counterparts elsewhere, however, the policy faces challenges. A predominantly tax-financed system in a nation with a high proportion of people living in poverty will always strive to contain rising costs. Disparities exist among the different health insurance schemes that provide coverage for Thai citizens. National health expenditure is heavily borne by the government, primarily to reduce financial barriers to access for the poor. The population is ageing and the disease profiles of the population are changing alongside the modernization of Thai people's lifestyles. Thailand is now aiming to enhance and sustain its UHC policy. We examine the merits of different policy options and aim to identify the most promising and feasible way to enhance and sustain UHC. We argue that developing the existing primary care system in Thailand has the greatest potential to provide more self-sustaining, efficient, equitable and effective UHC. Primary care needs to move from its traditional role of providing basic disease-based care, to being the first point of contact in an integrated, coordinated, community-oriented and person-focused care system, for which the national health budget should be prioritized.

La politique de couverture sanitaire universelle de la Thaïlande a bien progressé depuis sa création en 2002. Chaque citoyen thaïlandais a désormais le droit à des services de santé préventifs, curatifs et palliatifs essentiels à tous les stades de sa vie. Néanmoins, à l'instar de ses équivalents dans d'autres pays, cette politique fait face à des difficultés. Un système principalement financé par l'impôt dans un pays où une forte proportion de personnes vit dans la pauvreté devra toujours s'efforcer de limiter l'augmentation des coûts. Des disparités existent entre les différents régimes d'assurance maladie qui fournissent une couverture aux citoyens thaïlandais. Les dépenses nationales de santé sont largement prises en charge par le gouvernement, principalement pour réduire les obstacles financiers qui empêchent les pauvres d'accéder aux services de santé. La population vieillit et le profil des maladies de la population évolue en même temps que les modes de vie des Thaïlandais se modernisent. La Thaïlande a désormais l'intention de renforcer sa politique de couverture sanitaire universelle et d'assurer sa pérennité. Nous examinons les avantages de différentes possibilités d'action et cherchons à identifier la solution la plus prometteuse et réalisable pour renforcer et assurer la pérennité de la couverture sanitaire universelle. Nous soutenons que le développement du système existant de soins de santé primaires en Thaïlande est la meilleure solution pour fournir une couverture sanitaire universelle plus autonome, efficiente, équitable et efficace. Les soins primaires doivent s'écarter de leur rôle traditionnel qui est de fournir des soins de base axés sur une maladie pour être le premier point de contact dans un système de soins intégré, coordonné, orienté vers la communauté et axé sur la personne, ce qui nécessite de donner une priorité élevée au budget national de santé.

La política de Tailandia sobre la cobertura sanitaria universal (CSU) ha progresado mucho desde su creación en 2002. Todos los ciudadanos tailandeses tienen ahora derecho a servicios esenciales de salud preventiva, curativa y paliativa en todas las etapas de la vida. Sin embargo, al igual que sus homólogas en otros lugares, la política se enfrenta a desafíos. Un sistema financiado en su mayoría por impuestos en un país con una alta proporción de personas que viven en la pobreza siempre tendrá que esforzarse para limitar el aumento de los costes. Existen disparidades entre los diferentes planes de seguros sanitarios que ofrecen cobertura a los ciudadanos tailandeses. El gasto nacional en salud lo soporta en gran medida el gobierno, principalmente para reducir las barreras financieras al acceso de los pobres. La población envejece y los perfiles de enfermedad de la población cambian al mismo tiempo que se modernizan los estilos de vida de los habitantes de Tailandia. Tailandia aspira ahora a mejorar y mantener su política de CSU. Se han examinado los méritos de las diferentes opciones de políticas para así identificar la manera más prometedora y factible de mejorar y sostener la CSU. Se sostiene que el desarrollo del sistema de atención primaria de salud existente en Tailandia tiene el mayor potencial para proporcionar una atención primaria de salud más autosuficiente, eficiente, equitativa y eficaz. La atención primaria debe pasar de su función tradicional de proporcionar atención básica basada en la enfermedad a ser el primer punto de contacto en un sistema de atención integral, coordinado, orientado a la comunidad y centrado en las personas, para lo cual se debe dar prioridad al presupuesto nacional de salud.

Public subsidies and the recommendation of child vaccines among primary care physicians: a nationwide cross-sectional study in Japan.

OBJECTIVE: Although public subsidies and physician recommendations for vaccination play key roles in increasing childhood vaccination coverage, the association between them remains uncertain. This study aimed to identify the association between awareness of public subsidies and recommendations for Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib), Streptococcus pneumoniae (pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV)) and human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccinations among primary care physicians in Japan. DESIGN: This is a cross-sectional study. SETTING: In 2012, a questionnaire was distributed among 3000 randomly selected physicians who were members of the Japan Primary Care Association. PARTICIPANTS: From the questionnaire, participants were limited to physicians who administered childhood vaccinations. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary measures were participants' awareness of public subsidies and their recommendation levels for Hib, PCV and HPV vaccines. Multiple logistic regression analysis was performed to investigate the association between awareness and recommendation, with adjustment for possible confounders. RESULTS: The response rate was 25.8% (743/2880). Of 743 physician respondents, 434 were included as analysis subjects. The proportions of those who recommended vaccinations were 57.1% for Hib, 54.1% for PCV and 58.1% for HPV. For each vaccine, multivariable analyses showed physicians who were aware of the subsidy were more likely to recommend vaccination than those who were not aware: the adjusted ORs were 4.21 (95% CI 2.47 to 7.15) for Hib, 4.96 (95% CI 2.89 to 8.53) for PCV and 4.17 (95% CI 2.00 to 8.70) for HPV. CONCLUSIONS: Primary care physicians' awareness of public subsidies was found to be associated with their recommendations for the Hib, PCV and HPV vaccines. Provision of information about public subsidies to these physicians may increase their likelihood to recommend vaccination.

Influence of family dynamics on burden among family caregivers in aging Japan.

BACKGROUND: Long-term care for the elderly is largely shouldered by their family, representing a serious burden in a hyper-aging society. However, although family dynamics are known to play an important role in such care, the influence of caring for the elderly on burden among caregiving family members is poorly understood. OBJECTIVE: To examine the influence of family dynamics on burden experienced by family caregivers. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study at six primary care clinics, involving 199 caregivers of adult care receivers who need long-term care. Participants were divided into three groups based on tertile of Index of Family Dynamics for Long-term Care (IF-Long score), where higher scores imply poorer relationships between care receivers and caregiving family: best, <2; intermediate, 2 to <5; worst, ≥5. The mean differences in burden index of caregivers (BIC-11) between the three groups were estimated by linear regression model with adjustment for care receiver's activity of daily living and cognitive function. RESULTS: Mean age of caregivers was 63.2 years (with 40.7% aged ≥ 65 years). BIC-11 scores were higher in the worst IF-Long group (adjusted mean difference: 4.4, 95% confidence interval: 1.2 to 7.5) than in the best IF-Long group. We also detected a positive trend between IF-Long score and BIC-11 score (P-value for trend <0.01). CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate that family dynamics strongly influences burden experienced by caregiving family members, regardless of the care receiver's degree of cognitive impairment. These results underscore the importance of evaluating relationships between care receivers and their caregivers when discussing a care regimen for care receivers.

Developing a scale to measure family dynamics related to long-term care, and testing that scale in a multicenter cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: As Japan's population ages, more frail elderly people are cared for by members of their family. The dynamics within such families are difficult to study, in part because they are difficult to quantify. We developed a scale for assessing family dynamics related to long-term care. Here we report on the development of that scale, and we present the results of reliability testing and validation testing. METHODS: Two primary-care specialists drafted questions about family dynamics, and discussed them with other primary-care physicians and clinical researchers. The final questionnaire asked about four problems or undesirable situations: disengagement (emotional distance), scapegoating (inappropriate blame), transfer of problems across generations (transfer of unnecessary burden from older to younger generations, trans-generationally displaced revenge), and undesirable behavior (co-dependence). Next, at six general-medicine clinics, doctors evaluated families that had a caregiver and a patient requiring long-term care. The results were analyzed by factor analysis. Cronbach's α was computed, and criterion-related validation tests were done with three types of criteria: relationship before caregiving, ability to do activities of daily living (ADL), and the duration of care. RESULTS: Results were obtained from 199 families. Among the caregivers, 79% were women and their mean age was 63 years. Among the patients, 71% were women and their mean age was 84 years. The results of factor analysis indicated that the scale was unidimensional. Cronbach's α was 0.73. Not having a good relationship before caregiving was associated with significantly worse family dynamics scores, as was greater dependence regarding ADL. CONCLUSIONS: We developed a scale that enables physicians to assess the dynamics of families with a patient and a family caregiver. The scale's scores are reliable and the results of validation testing were generally good. This scale holds promise as a tool both for research and for primary-care practice.