Distal Pancreatic Resection with Splenectomy in the Rat: A Pancreatic Fistula Model to Investigate Postsurgical Damage?

BACKGROUND: Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) is a major complication in pancreatic surgery and can cause considerable postoperative morbidity. Advanced surgical-technical approaches to prevent POPF did not yield a substantial improvement. To investigate innovative treatments, experimental animal models of distal pancreatic resection and pancreaticoduodenectomy are of fundamental importance. After a failed attempt to replicate a previously described rat model for pancreatic fistula induction, we proceeded to distal pancreatic resection with splenectomy to provoke pancreatic leakage and generate a suitable animal model. METHODS: Distal pancreatic resection with splenectomy was performed in 40 rats. The rats were sacrificed on postoperative day (POD) 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, or 10, and the abdominal cavity was explored. Ascites probes were collected pre- and postoperatively for the detection of pancreas amylase and lipase. Tissue samples from the naïve pancreas (POD 0) and the postoperatively harvested remnant were evaluated histologically. The extent of necrosis was determined, and samples were examined for neutrophil infiltration. TUNEL staining served for the verification of necrosis in distinct cases. Immunohistochemistry of Ki67, von Willebrand factor, and CD68 was performed to evaluate proliferation, blood-vessel sprouting, and macrophage invasion. RESULTS: The rats showed no clinical symptoms or severe complications in the postoperative course up to 10 days. Abdominal exploration revealed adhesions in the upper abdomen, but no intra-abdominal fluid accumulations were found. Signs of inflammation and tissue damage were evident at the pancreatic resection margin on histological examination whereas the naïve pancreatic tissue was widely unaffected. Statistically significant differences were seen between the preoperative and postoperative extent of necrosis, the presence of neutrophil infiltrate, and levels of ascitic amylase and lipase. Immunohistochemical staining on Ki67, von Willebrand factor, and CD68 did not reveal any workable results on nonstatistical examination, and it was therefore not considered for further analyses. CONCLUSION: Creating a functional animal model of pancreatic fistula that reflects the clinical and pathophysiological impact of pancreatic leakage in humans has not been achieved. Our approach of left pancreatic resection recapitulated inflammation and tissue damage, early events in the development of fistulas, and it could be suitable for the experimental testing of novel targeting methods.

Intraductal tubulopapillary neoplasm (ITPN) of the pancreas associated with an invasive component: a case report with review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: Intraductal tubulopapillary neoplasm (ITPN) depicts a distinct entity in the subgroup of premalignant epithelial tumors of the pancreas. Although the histomorphological and immunophenotypical characterization of ITPN has been described by several authors in terms of report of case series in the past, the rarity of that tumor subtype and similarity to other entities still makes identification of ITPN a challenge for radiologists and pathologists. To date, little is known about tubulopapillary carcinoma that can evolve from ITPN. CASE PRESENTATION: In the present work, we analyze one case of ITPN associated with an invasive component and discuss the results involving the current literature. Collected patient data included medical history, clinical symptoms, laboratory tests, radiological imaging, reports of interventions and operation, and histopathological and immunohistochemical examinations. The patient initially presented with acute pancreatitis. A solid tumor obstructing the main pancreatic duct and sticking out of the papilla of Vater was detected and caught via endoscopic intervention. Histopathological examination of the specimen revealed mainly tubular growth pattern with back to back tubular glands. Immunohistochemically, the tumor was strongly positive for keratin 7 (CK7) and pankeratin AE1/AE3, and alpha 1 antichymotrypsin; negative for synaptophysin and chromogranin A, CDx2, CK20, S100, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), MUC 2, MUC5AC, and somatostatin; and in part positive for CA19-9. Extended pancreatoduodenectomy was performed, the final diagnosis was tubulopapillary carcinoma grown in an ITPN. CONCLUSION: The identification of an ITPN of the pancreas can be a challenging task. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography is an excellent tool to directly see and indirectly visualize the intraductal solid tumor and to take a biopsy for histopathological evaluation at the same time. Together with a thorough immunohistochemical workup, differential diagnoses can be ruled out quickly. To date, reports of ITPN are rare and little is known about the potential for malignant transformation and the prognosis of tubulopapillary carcinoma grown from an ITPN. Radical surgical resection following oncologic criteria is recommended; however, more data will be needed to assess an adequate treatment and follow-up standard.