Histologic eosinophilic gastritis is a systemic disorder associated with blood and extragastric eosinophilia, TH2 immunity, and a unique gastric transcriptome.

BACKGROUND: The definition of eosinophilic gastritis (EG) is currently limited to histologic EG based on the tissue eosinophil count. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to provide additional fundamental information about the molecular, histopathologic, and clinical characteristics of EG. METHODS: Genome-wide transcript profiles and histologic features of gastric biopsy specimens, as well as blood eosinophil counts, were analyzed in patients with EG and control subjects (n = 15 each). RESULTS: The peak gastric antrum eosinophil count was 283 ± 164 eosinophils/×400 high-power field in patients with EG and 11 ± 9 eosinophils/×400 high-power field in control subjects (P = 6.1 × 10(-7)). Patients with EG (87%) had coexisting eosinophilic inflammation in multiple gastrointestinal segments; the esophagus represented the most common secondary site. Increased peripheral blood eosinophil counts (patients with EG: 1.09 ± 0.88 × 10(3)/µL vs control subjects: 0.09 ± 0.08 10(3)/µL, P = .0027) positively correlated with peak gastric eosinophil counts (Pearson r(2) = .8102, P < .0001). MIB-1(+) (proliferating), CD117(+) (mast cells), and FOXP3(+) (regulatory T cells, activated T cells, or both) cell counts were increased in patients with EG. Transcript profiling revealed changes in 8% of the genome in gastric tissue from patients with EG. Only 7% of this EG transcriptome overlapped with the eosinophilic esophagitis transcriptome. Significantly increased IL4, IL5, IL13, IL17, CCL26, and mast cell-specific transcripts and decreased IL33 transcripts were observed. CONCLUSION: EG is a systemic disorder involving profound blood and gastrointestinal tract eosinophilia, TH2 immunity, and a conserved gastric transcriptome markedly distinct from the eosinophilic esophagitis transcriptome. The data herein define germane cellular and molecular pathways of EG and provide a basis for improving diagnosis and treatment.

Molecular diagnosis of eosinophilic esophagitis by gene expression profiling.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Gene expression profiling provides an opportunity for definitive diagnosis but has not yet been well applied to inflammatory diseases. Here we describe an approach for diagnosis of an emerging form of esophagitis, eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE), which is currently diagnosed by histology and clinical symptoms. METHODS: We developed an EoE diagnostic panel (EDP) comprising a 96-gene quantitative polymerase chain reaction array and an associated dual-algorithm that uses cluster analysis and dimensionality reduction using a cohort of randomly selected esophageal biopsy samples from pediatric patients with EoE (n = 15) or without EoE (non-EoE controls, n = 14) and subsequently vetted the EDP using a separate cohort of 194 pediatric and adult patient samples derived from both fresh or formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue: active EoE (n = 91), control (non-EoE and EoE remission, n = 57), histologically ambiguous (n = 34), and reflux (n = 12) samples. RESULTS: The EDP identified adult and pediatric patients with EoE with approximately 96% sensitivity and approximately 98% specificity, and distinguished patients with EoE in remission from controls, as well as identified patients exposed to swallowed glucorticoids. The EDP could be used with formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue RNA and distinguished patients with EoE from those with reflux esophagitis, identified by pH-impedance testing. Preliminary evidence showed that the EDP could identify patients likely to have disease relapse after treatment. CONCLUSIONS: We developed a molecular diagnostic test (referred to as the EDP) that identifies patients with esophagitis in a fast, objective, and mechanistic manner, offering an opportunity to improve diagnosis and treatment, and a platform approach for other inflammatory diseases.

A striking local esophageal cytokine expression profile in eosinophilic esophagitis.

BACKGROUND: Eosinophilic esophagitis (EE) is an emerging worldwide disease that mimics gastroesophageal reflux disease. OBJECTIVE: Early studies have suggested that esophageal eosinophilia occurs in association with T(H)2 allergic responses, yet the local and systemic expression of relevant cytokines has not been well characterized. METHODS: A human inflammatory cytokine and receptor PCR array containing 84 genes followed by PCR validation and multiplex arrays were used to quantify cytokine mRNA in esophageal biopsies and blood samples. RESULTS: Esophageal transcripts of numerous chemokines (eg, chemokine [C-C motif] ligand [CCL] 1, CCL1, CCL23, CCL26 [eotaxin-3], chemokine [C-X-C motif] ligand [CXCL] 1, and CXCL2), cytokines (eg, IL13 and ATP-binding cassette, subfamily F, member 1), and cytokine receptors (eg, IL5 receptor, alpha) were induced at least 4-fold in individuals with EE. Analysis of esophageal biopsies (n = 288) revealed that eotaxin-3 mRNA level alone had 89% sensitivity for distinguishing individuals with and without EE. The presence of allergy was associated with significantly increased esophageal expression of IL4 and IL5 mRNA in patients with active EE. We identified 8 cytokines (IL-4, IL-13, IL-5, IL-6, IL-12p70, CD40 ligand, IL-1α, and IL-17) whose blood levels retrospectively distinguished 12 patients without EE from 13 patients with EE with 100% specificity and 100% sensitivity. When applied to a blind, prospectively recruited group of 36 patients, the cytokine panel scoring system had a 79% positive predictive value, 68% negative predictive value, 61% sensitivity, and 83% specificity for identifying EE. CONCLUSION: Evidence is presented that IL13 and IL5 associate with eosinophil and eotaxin-3 levels, indicating the key role of adaptive T(H)2 immunity in regulating eotaxin-3-driven esophageal eosinophilia in the absence of a consistent systemic change in cytokines.

Variants of thymic stromal lymphopoietin and its receptor associate with eosinophilic esophagitis.

BACKGROUND: The genetic cause of eosinophilic esophagitis (EE) has been largely unexplored until a recent genome-wide association study identified a disease susceptibility locus on 5q22, a region that harbors the thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP) gene. However, it is unclear whether the observed genetic associations with EE are disease-specific or confounded by the high rate of allergy in patients with EE. In addition, the genetic contributions of other allergy-associated genes to EE risk have not been explored. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to delineate single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) that associated with EE apart from allergy. METHODS: We used a custom array containing 738 SNPs in 53 genes implicated in allergic responses, immune responses, or both to genotype 220 allergic or 246 nonallergic control subjects and a discovery cohort of 170 patients with EE. We replicated a statistically significant SNP association in an independent case-control cohort and examined the induction of the candidate gene in primary esophageal epithelial cells. RESULTS: A single SNP residing in the TSLP gene reached Bonferroni linkage disequilibrium-adjusted significance but only when patients with EE were compared with allergic control subjects (rs10062929; P = 4.11 x 10(-5); odds ratio, 0.35). A nonsynonymous polymorphism in the thymic stromal lymphopoietin receptor (TSLPR) gene on Xp22.3 and Yp11.3 was significantly associated with disease only in male patients with EE. Primary esophageal epithelial cells expressed TSLP mRNA after Toll-like receptor 3 stimulation. CONCLUSION: These data collectively identify TSLP as a candidate gene critically involved in EE susceptibility beyond its role in promoting T(H)2 responses.

Coordinate interaction between IL-13 and epithelial differentiation cluster genes in eosinophilic esophagitis.

We have previously proposed that the pathogenesis of eosinophilic esophagitis (EE) is mediated by an IL-13-driven epithelial cell response associated with marked gene dysregulation including eotaxin-3 overproduction. In this study, we compared epithelial responses between healthy patients and those with EE, aiming to uncover molecular explanations for EE pathogenesis. Esophageal epithelial cells could be maintained for up to five passages, with 67% and 62% of cell lines reaching confluence in healthy controls and EE cases, respectively. Both sets of epithelial cells avidly responded to IL-13 at similar levels as assessed by eotaxin-3 production. Acidic pH increased cellular release of eotaxin-3 (4.6 +/- 1.98 ng/ml versus 12.46 +/- 2.90 ng/ml at pH 7.4 and 4, respectively; p < 0.05). Numerous epidermal differentiation complex (EDC) genes, such as filaggrin and SPRR3, were downregulated both in IL-13-stimulated esophageal epithelial cells and in EE biopsies specimens compared with healthy controls. Whereas the filaggrin loss of function mutation 2282del4 was overrepresented in EE compared with control individuals (6.1% versus 1.3% respectively; p = 0.0172), the decreased filaggrin expression was uniformly seen in all EE cases in vivo. Indeed, expression of the EDC genes filaggrin and involucrin was strongly decreased directly by IL-13. These results establish that the epithelial response in EE involves a cooperative interaction between IL-13 and expression of EDC genes.

Randomized placebo-controlled trial of pantoprazole for daytime sleepiness in GERD and obstructive sleep disordered breathing.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy of pantoprazole therapy for daytime somnolence, psychomotor vigilance, and quality of life in patients with mild-moderate obstructive sleep disordered breathing (OSDB) and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). STUDY DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial. METHODS: Sixty patients with daytime sleepiness, mild-moderate OSDB and GERD were randomly assigned a 2-week treatment with pantoprazole 40 mg or placebo followed by a 2-week washout period and crossover respectively to 2-week treatment with placebo or pantoprazole. Outcomes included Epworth Sleepiness Score (ESS), sleep-related quality-of-life (FOSQ), and reaction time. RESULTS: With pantoprazole, patients reported statistically significantly greater improvement of overall reflux symptoms (P = 0.0003) and in ESS (P = 0.04). A significant improvement was noted in FOSQ for both treatments with a trend toward greater improvement with pantoprazole (P = 0.058). No improvement in reaction times was observed. CONCLUSION: Patients with coexistent GERD and OSDB noted significant improvement in daytime sleepiness after treatment with pantoprazole over placebo likely related to a reduction in nocturnal reflux-related arousals.

Anti-IL-5 (mepolizumab) therapy for eosinophilic esophagitis.

BACKGROUND: Eosinophilic esophagitis (EE) is characterized by high numbers of eosinophils in the esophagus and epithelial hyperplasia, and is being increasingly recognized. IL-5 promotes eosinophil trafficking to the esophagus, and positively regulates eosinophil growth, activation, survival, and tissue recruitment. OBJECTIVE: We hypothesized that the humanized monoclonal IgG(1) antibody against human IL-5 (mepolizumab) may be useful in the control of EE. METHODS: An open-label phase I/II safety and efficacy study of anti-IL-5 in 4 adult patients with EE and longstanding dysphagia and esophageal strictures was conducted. Patients received 3 infusions of anti-IL-5 (750 mg intravenously monthly) without change in their current therapy. The levels of plasma IL-5, peripheral blood eosinophils, and CCR3+ cells in blood, quality of life measurements, and histological analysis of esophageal biopsies were determined before and 1 month after treatment. RESULTS: Peripheral blood eosinophilia and percent of CCR3+ cells decreased by 6.4-fold and 7.9-fold (P < .05), respectively, after anti-IL-5 treatment. Notably, mean and maximal esophageal eosinophilia decreased from 46 to 6 and from 153 to 28 eosinophils/high-power field (x400; average, 8.9-fold, P < .001, and 6-fold, P < .05), respectively. Patients reported a better clinical outcome and improved quality of life (P = .03). Therapy was generally well tolerated, and responsiveness to anti-IL-5 therapy did not correlate with plasma IL-5 levels. CONCLUSION: Anti-IL-5 therapy is associated with marked decreases in peripheral blood and esophageal eosinophilia (including the number of CCR3+ blood cells) in patients with EE and improved clinical outcomes. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Anti-IL-5 is a promising therapeutic intervention for EE.