ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The aims of this study were to elucidate the incidence of mitral regurgitation during off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) surgery to evaluate the relationship of the changes with ventricular function and possible mitral valve regurgitation caused by positioning. METHODS: Included in the study were 60 consecutive patients who underwent CAB grafting on the beating heart. We monitored several hemodynamic variables (systolic arterial pressure, mean arterial pressure, right atrial pressure, pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, and heart rate) at baseline and after each anastomosis and used transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) routinely after sternotomy, during each anastomosis, and after completion of the operation. Valvular functions, ejection fraction, and wall motion systolic index were recorded during each TEE evaluation. RESULTS: All of the patients underwent complete revascularization. We performed 132 consecutive OPCAB anastomoses in 60 patients (60 left anterior descending artery [LAD], 20 right coronary artery [RCA], 45 left circumflex coronary artery [LCX], and 7 diagonal artery grafts). During LCX anastomosis, 38 (84.4%) of 45 patients developed moderate mitral regurgitation. The wall motion score index (WMSI) significantly increased during CX grafting, as was demonstrated by higher WMSI values than for the RCA, diagonal, and LAD grafts. The ejection fraction was decreased significantly during CX and RCA anastomoses compared with baseline levels. The hemodynamic changes were in accord with these findings. The greatest hemodynamic compromise was seen during CX anastomosis. CONCLUSION: Positional mitral regurgitation occurs frequently and is a major contributor to hemodynamic instability during posterior- and lateral-wall revascularization during the OPCAB procedure.
Subject(s)
Coronary Artery Bypass, Off-Pump/statistics & numerical data , Mitral Valve Insufficiency/diagnosis , Mitral Valve Insufficiency/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/diagnosis , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Risk Assessment/methods , Aged , Comorbidity , Female , Humans , Incidence , Male , Postoperative Complications/classification , Risk Factors , Treatment Outcome , Turkey/epidemiologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: A significant number of patients undergoing coronary artery surgery have severe carotid artery disease. It is also true that up to half of the patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy (CEA) have severe treatable coronary lesions. This study aims to review data regarding 82 patients of combined approach in 8 years; the second half consists of 44 patients whose CEA was performed under local anesthesia. It compares results of the conventional and the modified approaches to simultaneous surgery. METHODS: All 82 patients who planned to have a concomitant procedure were recorded prospectively between 1995 and 2003. From 1998, the surgical technique has been modified to switch to local anesthesia for CEA, rather than perform under a single general anesthetic period. All pre-and perioperative data as well as in-hospital and outpatient control (mid- to long-term) data were recorded. A P-value of less than .05 was considered as significant. Analysis of survival was performed by using the Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test. RESULTS: The 30-day follow-up was 100% complete for all patients. All patients were followed for 59.59 to 114 months) months postoperatively. Three patients (6.8%) in the modified and 2 (5.2%) in the standard group had intraluminal shunting (P > .05). In the standard group, 3 patients expired and 3 had perioperative stroke; only 1 patient had a stroke in the modified group and two expired (P > .05). Mean survival time according to Kaplan-Meier test was 109.97, SE 2.84, 95% CI (104.41-115.52) months for the former group, whereas it was 62.79, SE 1.20, 95% CI (60.4565.13) months for the latter. Actuarial estimates of survival during ten-year follow up were 94.44% SE 3.83 in ten-year follow-ups and 97.67% SE 2.30 in 5-year follow-ups for the modified group (P > .05). CONCLUSIONS: Avoidance from extended periods of general anesthesia and cardiopulmonary bypass periods as well as immediate recognition of impaired cerebral flow during CEA and the time it provides to take preventive measures are the most important benefits of the modified technique without significantly changing hospital and long-term mortality and stroke. It may also reduce the cost and the waiting period for the suffering patient.
