Risk Factors of Pneumonia in Primary Antibody Deficiency Patients Receiving Immunoglobulin Therapy: Data from the US Immunodeficiency Network (USIDNET).

BACKGROUND: Despite immunoglobulin replacement (IgRT) therapy, some patients with primary antibody deficiency (PAD) continue to develop respiratory infections. Recurrent and severe respiratory infections, particularly pneumonia, can lead to significant morbidity and mortality. Therefore, we sought to determine the risk factors of developing pneumonia in PAD patients, already receiving IgRT. METHODS: We evaluated clinical and laboratory features of PAD patients enrolled in the US Immune Deficiency Network (USIDNET) registry by April 2017. Patients were included if they met the following criteria: (1) PAD diagnosis (common variable immunodeficiency (CVID), agammaglobulinemia, hypogammaglobinemia, and specific antibody deficiency (SAD) and (2) available data on infections before and after IgRT. Patients were excluded if they were not receiving IgRT, or if no pre/post infections data were available. Descriptive and multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to identify factors associated with pneumonia post-IgRT. RESULTS: A total of 1232 patients met the inclusion criteria. Following IgRT, 218 patients (17.7%) were reported to have at least one pneumonia episode. Using multivariate logistic regression analysis, we found a statistically significant increased risk of pneumonia in patients with asthma (OR: 2.55, 95% CI (1.69-3.85), p < 0.001) bronchiectasis (OR: 3.94, 95% CI (2.29-6.80), p < 0.001), interstitial lung disease (ILD) (OR: 3.28, 95%CI (1.43-7.56), p < 0.005), splenomegaly (OR: 2.02, 95%CI (1.08-3.76), p < 0.027), allergies (OR: 2.44, 95% CI [1.44-4.13], p = 0.001), and patients who were not on immunosuppressives (OR: 1.61; 95%CI [1.06-2.46]; p = 0.027). For every 50 unit increase in IgA, the odds of reporting pneumonia post IgRT decreased (OR: 0.86, 95% CI [0.73-1.02], p = 0.062). Infectious organisms were reported in 35 of 218 patients who reported pneumonia after IgRT. Haemophilus influenzae was the most frequently reported (n = 11, 31.43%), followed by Streptococcus pneumoniae (n = 7, 20.00%). CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest PAD patients with chronic and structural lung disease, splenomegaly, and allergies were associated with persistent pneumonia. However, our study is limited by the cross-sectional nature of the USIDNET database and limited longitudinal data. Further studies are warranted to identify susceptible causes and explore targeted solutions for prevention and associated morbidity and mortality. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Patients with primary antibody deficiency with structural lung disease, allergies, and splenomegaly are associated with persistent pneumonia post-IgRT.

Visualizing and assessing US county-level COVID19 vulnerability.

BACKGROUND: Like most of the world, the United States' public health and economy are impacted by the COVID19 pandemic. However, discrete pandemic effects may not be fully realized on the macro-scale. With this perspective, our goal is to visualize spread of the pandemic and measure county-level features which may portend vulnerability. METHODS: We accessed the New York Times GitHub repository COVID19 data and 2018 United States Census data for all United States Counties. The disparate datasets were merged and filtered to allow for visualization and assessments about case fatality rate (CFR%) and associated demographic, ethnic and economic features. RESULTS: Our results suggest that county-level COVID19 fatality rates are related to advanced population age (P < .001) and less diversity as evidenced by higher proportion of Caucasians in High CFR% counties (P < .001). Also, lower CFR% counties had a greater proportion of the population reporting has having 2 or more races (P < .001). We noted no significant differences between High and Low CFR% counties with respect to mean income or poverty rate. CONCLUSIONS: Unique COVID19 impacts are realized at the county level. Use of public datasets, data science skills and information visualization can yield helpful insights to drive understanding about community-level vulnerability.

Infection Phenotypes Among Patients with Primary Antibody Deficiency Mined from a US Patient Registry.

PURPOSE: Primary immunodeficiency disorders (PIDs) affect immune system development and/or function, increase infection susceptibility, and cause dysregulation or both. Recognition of PID requires assessment about the normal state of infection frequency and microbiology. To help clarify infection characteristics, we use data mined from the US Immunodeficiency Network (USIDNET) registry among primary antibody deficiency (PAD) patients before diagnosis. METHODS: We analyzed PAD patient data from the USIDNET registry prior to ultimate diagnosis. Our analysis included basic descriptive statistics for 8 major infection subtypes and significance testing for comparing infection rate by specific organisms across 7 distinct PAD subtypes. RESULTS: Of 2038 patients reviewed, 1259 (61.8%) had infections reported prior to diagnosis. Most (77.4%) had four or less reported infections prior to diagnosis; however, some suffered up to 16 infections. Infection patterns differed across the PAD subtypes. Patients with agammaglobulinemia differed significantly from patients with all other forms of PAD studied in at least one infection category, whereas patients with CVID differed from 3 other PAD categories in at least one infection category. Patterns of infections in patients with hypogammaglobulinemia, specific antibody deficiency, and transient hypogammaglobulinemia were less unique. For each of the infection types, bacteria were the most prevalent cause of disease. CONCLUSIONS: Our data shows that distinct subtypes of PAD display unique infection patterns. We also show that patients with agammaglobulinemia suffer more invasive infections and differ most significantly from all other forms of PAD studied. Our analysis has broad implications about infection surveillance, progression, and vulnerability by PAD subtype.

Prophylactic Antibiotics Versus Immunoglobulin Replacement in Specific Antibody Deficiency.

PURPOSE: Prophylactic antibiotics (PA) and immunoglobulin replacement (IGRT) are commonly used in specific antibody deficiency (SAD); however, optimal treatment is not well-established. Our purpose is to compare treatment outcomes with IGRT and/or PA among SAD patients. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of SAD patients treated at two tertiary centers between January 2012 and May 2017 was performed. Clinical and laboratory data, and rates of infections prior to and after treatment with IGRT or PA were analyzed. Descriptive analyses, between-group comparisons of rates of infection after 1 year of treatment, and a stepwise logistic regression model were employed to explore factors contributing to treatment outcomes. RESULTS: We identified 65 SAD patients with mean age were 18 years (2-71 years). The baseline mean number of infections in the PA group and IGRT group was 4.71 (SD 3.15) and 7.73 (SD 6.65), respectively. Twenty-nine (44.6%) received IGRT, 7 (10.7%) received PA, 7 (10.7%) received both IGRT and PA, 15 (23.1%) failed PA and switched to IGRT, and 7 did not receive any specific treatment. After 1 year of treatment, the difference in the mean number of infections in PA vs. IGRT was not statistically significant [2.86 (2.73) vs. 4.44 (4.74), p = 0.27]. Reporting autoimmunity increased the odds for persistent infections (OR = 4.29; p = 0.047), while higher IgG levels decreased the odds for persistent infections (OR = 0.68, p = 0.018). CONCLUSIONS: PA and IGRT are equally effective as first line in preventing infections in SAD patients. However, patients who fail PA would benefit from IGRT.

Health-Related Quality of Life in Adult Patients with Common Variable Immunodeficiency Disorders and Impact of Treatment.

PURPOSE: Common variable immunodeficiency disorder (CVID) is a primary immunodeficiency disease (PIDD) often associated with severe and chronic infections. Patients commonly receive immunoglobulin (Ig) treatment to reduce the cycle of recurrent infection and improve physical functioning. However, how Ig treatment in CVID affects quality of life (QOL) has not been thoroughly evaluated. The purpose of a recent Immune Deficiency Foundation (IDF) mail survey was to assess the factors that are associated with QOL in patients with CVID receiving Ig treatment. METHODS: A 75-question survey developed by the IDF and a 12-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) to assess QOL were mailed to adults with CVID. Mean SF-12 scores were compared between patients with CVID and the general US adult population normative sample. RESULTS: Overall, 945 patients with CVID completed the surveys. More than half of the patients (54.9%) received intravenous Ig and 44.9% received subcutaneous Ig treatment. Patients with CVID had significantly lower SF-12 scores compared with the general US population regardless of sex or age (p < 0.05). Route of IgG replacement did not dramatically improve QOL. SF-12 scores were highest in patients with CVID who have well-controlled PIDD, lacked physical impairments, were not bothered by treatment, and received Ig infusions at home. CONCLUSION: These data provide insight into what factors are most associated with physical and mental health, which can serve to improve QOL in patients in this population. Improvements in QOL can result from early detection of disease, limiting digestive system disease, attention to fatigue, and implementation of an individual treatment plan for the patient.