Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 8 de 8
Filter
1.
J Cardiovasc Nurs ; 39(2): 128-141, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37249549

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Given the functional impairments and complex care routines associated with heart failure (HF), patients often rely on the support of informal caregivers. Although the importance of caregivers' roles is widely recognized, the intensity and time required for care duties may negatively impact caregiver health and well-being, potentially precipitating their own need for care. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to synthesize estimates of economic, clinical, burden, and health-related quality-of-life impact among caregivers of those with HF in the United States. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted to identify studies reporting estimates of caregiver impact. Abstract and full-text review as well as data extraction were performed according to established guidelines. Patient and caregiver characteristics were summarized, as well as estimates of impact of caring for those with HF. RESULTS: From 3680 abstracts, 44 studies reporting caregiver burden estimates were included. Mean caregiver age ranged from 41.4 to 71.4 years; caregivers were primarily female (range, 49%-100%) and the patient's spouse/partner (21%-100%). Time spent caregiving (6 studies) ranged from 2 to 52 h/wk, and depression was identified in up to 40% of caregivers (9 studies). Numerous instruments were used to measure burden, which consistently documented the high impact of caregiving. CONCLUSIONS: This review demonstrates the multifaceted impact of caregiving for patients with HF. Despite limited data, notable findings included the considerable burden to caregivers, variability in time spent caregiving, and frequent experience of depression among caregivers, possibly leading to increased healthcare resource use. Future research is needed to better characterize the caregiving impact in HF, including evaluating the drivers of burden.


Subject(s)
Heart Failure , Quality of Life , Humans , Female , United States , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Caregivers , Stress, Psychological , Heart Failure/therapy , Caregiver Burden
3.
Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol ; 6(10): 1287-300, 2010 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20822479

ABSTRACT

IMPORTANCE OF THE FIELD: Anidulafungin is one of three available intravenous echinocandins that plays an important role in the treatment of serious fungal infections. Currently, anidulafungin is approved for the treatment of esophageal candidiasis, candidemia and other invasive Candida infections including intra-abdominal abscesses and peritonitis. AREAS COVERED IN THIS REVIEW: This paper covers a comprehensive review of anidulafungin. WHAT THE READER WILL GAIN: The reader will be provided the most recent data available regarding the pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, in vitro activity and clinical utility of anidulafungin for the treatment of serious fungal infections. TAKE HOME MESSAGE: Echinocandin antifungals, such as anidulafungin, are now considered first line for the treatment of candidemia and invasive candidiasis, particularly in critically ill patients or those who have previously received azole therapy. Anidulafungin has potent in vitro activity against Candida and Aspergillus species, predictable pharmacokinetics that does not require dosage adjustment, few drug interactions and is well tolerated. Because of these favorable characteristics, anidulafungin is an important addition to our antifungal armamentarium.


Subject(s)
Antifungal Agents/pharmacology , Echinocandins/pharmacology , Mycoses/drug therapy , Anidulafungin , Animals , Antifungal Agents/adverse effects , Antifungal Agents/pharmacokinetics , Aspergillosis/drug therapy , Candidiasis/drug therapy , Clinical Trials as Topic , Drug Interactions , Echinocandins/adverse effects , Echinocandins/pharmacokinetics , Humans , Mycoses/microbiology
4.
Am J Pharm Educ ; 74(5)2010 Jun 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20798803

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To compare accuracy of blood pressure measurements using a live subject and a simulator arm, and to determine students' preferences regarding measurement. METHODS: This was a crossover study comparing blood pressure measurements from a live subject and a simulator arm. Students completed an anonymous survey instrument defining opinions on ease of measurement. RESULTS: Fifty-seven students completed blood pressure measurements on live subjects while 72 students completed blood pressure measurements using the simulator arm. There were no significant systematic differences between the 2 measurement techniques. Systolic blood pressure measurements from a live subject arm were less likely to be within 4 mm Hg compared with measurements of a simulator arm. Diastolic blood pressure measurements were not significantly different between the 2 techniques. CONCLUSIONS: Accuracy of student measurement of blood pressure using a simulator arm was similar to the accuracy with a live subject. There was no difference in students' preferences regarding measurement techniques.


Subject(s)
Blood Pressure Determination/methods , Computer Simulation , Education, Pharmacy/methods , Arm/blood supply , Attitude of Health Personnel , Blood Pressure Determination/statistics & numerical data , Cross-Over Studies , Humans , Models, Anatomic , Students, Pharmacy/psychology
5.
Pharmacotherapy ; 30(5): 453-62, 2010 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20411997

ABSTRACT

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine hospital costs associated with the use of a clinical pathway implemented in our intensive care units (ICUs) to optimize antibiotic regimen selection for patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) compared with costs in a historical control group treated according to prescriber preference. DESIGN: Retrospective cost analysis from the hospital perspective. SETTING: Single, tertiary-care medical center. PATIENTS: One hundred sixty-six adults with VAP from the medical, surgical, and neurotrauma ICUs (73 historical control patients [2004-2005] and 93 patients given an empiric antibiotic clinical pathway for VAP [2006-2007]). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The VAP clinical pathway consisted of an ICU-specific three-drug regimen that considered local minimum inhibitory concentration distributions and a pharmacodynamically optimized dosing strategy. Hospital cost data were collected and inflated to 2007 according to the consumer price index. The VAP-related length of treatment, hospitalization costs, and antibiotic costs were compared between groups. The median VAP length of treatment was 24 days (interquartile range [IQR] 13-35 days] and 11 days (IQR 7-17 days) for historical and clinical pathway groups, respectively (p<0.001). Daily hospital costs were similar for both cohorts over the first 7 days, after which costs declined significantly for patients treated with the clinical pathway (p<0.001). When controlling for baseline differences between groups and length of stay before development of VAP, patients treated with the clinical pathway had shorter lengths of ICU stay after VAP, shorter total hospital lengths of stay after VAP, and lower hospital costs after the treatment of VAP. Median total antibiotic costs for individual patients were similar between groups ($535 [IQR $261-998] vs $482 [IQR $222-985] clinical pathway vs control, p=0.45), and the proportion of VAP hospital resources consumed by antibiotics for both groups was low. CONCLUSION: Although aggressive dosing of more costly antibiotics was empirically prescribed using the clinical pathway, patients in this group exhibited a shorter duration of treatment, reduced hospital length of stay after VAP, and lower hospital costs without any significant increase in antibiotic expenditures.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/economics , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Hospital Costs , Length of Stay , Pharmaceutical Services , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/economics , Adult , Aged , Aging , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Cohort Studies , Costs and Cost Analysis , Drug Therapy, Combination , Female , Hospitals, Urban/economics , Hospitals, Urban/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Intensive Care Units/statistics & numerical data , Length of Stay/economics , Male , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Middle Aged , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/complications , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/drug therapy , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/mortality , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/drug effects , Retrospective Studies , Statistics as Topic , Superinfection/prevention & control , Time Factors
7.
J Crit Care ; 23(1): 91-100, 2008 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18359426

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Studies have found that initial treatment of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) and blood stream infections (BSI) with inappropriate antimicrobial therapy is associated with higher rates of mortality, but additional studies have failed to confirm this. METHODS: Databases were searched to identify studies that met the following criteria: observational trials, patients with VAP or BSI receiving appropriate and inappropriate antimicrobial therapy, and mortality data. We conducted random-effects model meta-analyses, both with and without adjustment. RESULTS: Meta-analyses of VAP studies using unadjusted and adjusted data indicated that inappropriate therapy significantly increased patients' odds of mortality (odds ratio [OR], 2.34; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.51-3.63; P = .0001, I 2 = 28.5% and OR, 3.03; 95% CI, 1.12-8.19; P = .0292, I 2 = 89.2%, respectively). Meta-analyses of BSI studies using unadjusted and adjusted data showed that inappropriate therapy significantly increased patients' odds of mortality (OR, 2.33; 95% CI, 1.96-2.76; P < .0001, I 2 = 48.7% and OR, 2.28; 95% CI, 1.43-3.65; P = .0006, I 2 = 88.2%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: There appears to be an association between initial inappropriate antimicrobial therapy and increased mortality in patients with VAP and BSI.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Bacteremia/drug therapy , Bacteremia/mortality , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/drug therapy , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/mortality , Bacteremia/microbiology , Data Interpretation, Statistical , Humans , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/microbiology
8.
Curr Med Res Opin ; 23(6): 1239-44, 2007 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17559720

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: It has been acknowledged that patients who receive a beta-blocker or diuretic based regimen are at increased risk of developing new-onset diabetes. Recently, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) have been shown to decrease patients' odds of developing new-onset type 2 diabetes. A number of large placebo-controlled multi-center trials in post-myocardial infarction and heart failure patients have shown the ability of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system medications to reduce the onset of type 2 diabetes. Pharmacologic data has shown improved insulin sensitivity with ACEIs and ARBs. Controversy persists regarding the influence of calcium channel blockers on the development of new-onset diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Two reviewers conducted a systematic literature search of Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Library (1966 to December 2006) to extract a consensus of trial data involving calcium channel blockers versus diuretics or beta-blockers with an endpoint of new-onset type 2 diabetes. Studies were included if they were randomized controlled trials versus routine treatment, not observational studies of clinical practice. A random-effects model was utilized. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were conducted. RESULTS: Out of 1721 trials, six meeting inclusion criteria were identified, including 99 006 patients. Calcium channel blockers were associated with a reduced incidence of new-onset type 2 diabetes (odds ratio 0.81; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.73-0.90; p = 0.0001) compared with diuretic or beta-blocker therapy. The reduction in new-onset type 2 diabetes was maintained when a calcium channel blocker was compared to only thiazide diuretics (OR 0.86; 95% CI 0.75-0.99; p = 0.0346). The meta-analysis was limited by the varying definition of new-onset type 2 diabetes mellitus, as well as the potential for publication bias, which is a limit of any meta-analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Calcium channel blockers may be associated with reduced odds of developing new-onset type 2 diabetes compared to diuretics and beta-blockers.


Subject(s)
Adrenergic beta-Antagonists/adverse effects , Calcium Channel Blockers/adverse effects , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/etiology , Diuretics/adverse effects , Hypertension/complications , Adrenergic beta-Antagonists/therapeutic use , Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers/therapeutic use , Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Calcium Channel Blockers/therapeutic use , Diuretics/therapeutic use , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Hypertension/drug therapy , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Risk Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...