Antepartum support group for women hospitalized on bed rest.

PURPOSE: To identify the themes of discussion spontaneously voiced during an antepartum support group by high-risk pregnant women who were hospitalized on bed rest. DESIGN: Descriptive and exploratory, using content analysis. METHODS: Support groups were held weekly in a tertiary level hospital in a Midwestern state. The convenience sample consisted of 27 women hospitalized for treatment of either preterm labor, incompetent cervix, placenta previa, premature rupture of membranes, or multiple gestation. The group, which was led by the investigator, was unstructured and nondirective. Process recordings of women's spontaneous verbalizations were made during each of 13 antepartum support group sessions. RESULTS: The women identified seven discussion themes: methods of coping, concerns about family, negative emotions, relationships with caregivers, psychosocial losses associated with bed rest treatment, side effects of medical treatments, and concerns for the safety for self and/or fetal health. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: An unstructured support group that provides women on hospital bed rest with an opportunity to talk in a confidential and supportive environment may be an important antepartum nursing intervention in helping them cope.

A two-factor model of the Depression Coping Questionnaire.

The original 11 factors reported for the 29-item Depression Coping Questionnaire (DCQ) unnecessarily limits its potential usefulness as a clinically interpretable self-report measure. Therefore, the goal of this study was to reduce the number of DCQ factors to equal the number of core dimensions of depression coping addressed by the measure. Study participants (N = 668) completed the original 29-item DCQ and the Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression (CES-D) scale. The total sample was then split into two equal randomized subsamples. Using a factor loading value cutoff of .40, an initial LISREL exploratory factor analysis produced a 22-item, three-dimension model of positive (10 items), negative (8 items), and substance/sexual (4 items) depression coping behaviors. Because both the negative and substance/sexual dimensions addressed detrimental dimensions of depression coping, these factors were intercorrelated, however, the negative dimension accounted for greater variance. Consequently, given the stated goal of this study the model was then restricted to two core dimensions of positive and negative depression coping. Using the second split-half subsample, a LISREL confirmatory factor analysis produced a 17-item, two-factor model. One negative item (daydreaming) failed to maintain a loading value of .40 or higher and was deleted. The Goodness-of-Fit index for the 17-item, two-factor DCQ was .87 and the Root Mean Square Residual was .08. DCQ alpha coefficients were acceptable at .82 (positive) and .74 (negative). Significant CES-D subgroup differences and correlations were observed.