Interpregnancy interval and subsequent pregnancy outcomes after dilation and evacuation.

We conducted this study to compare outcomes for pregnancies conceived ≤6 months after dilation and evacuation (D&E) with those conceived >6 months after D&E. This retrospective cohort study included women who underwent D&E (14-26 weeks) and were readmitted with a subsequent pregnancy. The primary outcome was the rate of preterm birth (<37 weeks). We identified 737 D&Es with 214 subsequent pregnancies. Outcomes were available for 85.5% of these pregnancies. Preterm birth <37 weeks occurred in 9.4% (3/32) of patients with an interpregnancy interval ≤6 months and 20.7% (12/58) of patients with an interpregnancy interval >6 months (p = .17). No differences in preterm birth <34 weeks, postpartum haemorrhage, placentation abnormalities, intrauterine growth restriction, cervical insufficiency or mode of delivery were noted. Adverse pregnancy outcomes were not higher in the group of women who conceived ≤6 months after D&E compared to those who waited longer than 6 months. IMPACT STATEMENT What is already known on this subject: A small number of studies have noted an increased risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes with an interpregnancy interval of 6 months or fewer after a spontaneous or an induced abortion. What the results of this study add: We present the first study exploring pregnancy outcomes after dilation and evacuation for termination of pregnancy at 14 weeks or greater. Our results do not support an increased rate of adverse events with an interpregnancy interval of 6 months or fewer following dilation and evacuation. What the implications are of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research: Because of limitations in sample size, our results should be interpreted in the context of other studies.

Women's willingness and ability to feel the strings of their intrauterine device.

OBJECTIVE: To determine how many intrauterine device (IUD) users are willing and able to palpate their IUD strings. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among IUD users presenting for their 6-week follow-up visit after insertion at the University of Hawaii, USA, between January 2011 and January 2012. Participants were asked whether they had previously felt the strings and whether they were willing to do so during the visit. Bivariate analyses and multiple logistic regression were performed. RESULTS: Previous attempts to palpate IUD strings were reported by 74 (58.7%) of 126 participants, of whom 49 (66.2%) could feel the strings. At the study visit, 60 (47.6%) participants were willing to try to feel their strings; 33 (55.0%) were successful. Overall, 58 (46.0%) participants were willing and able to palpate their IUD strings at home and/or at the study visit. Fewer women who self-identified as native Hawaiian than women of other races reported previous attempts (P=0.005). Previous instruction to check IUD strings was associated with willingness to palpate them before and after controlling for native Hawaiian race (odds ratio 8.78, 95% CI 3.43-22.43; adjusted odds ratio 9.64, 95% CI 3.57-26.04). CONCLUSION: Approximately half the participants were willing and able to palpate their IUD strings. Routinely counseling women to check their IUD strings could have limited clinical utility.

Hemoglobin A1c in pregestational diabetic gravidas and the risk of congenital heart disease in the fetus.

This study aimed to determine whether poor glycemic control in early pregnancy is associated with an increased risk of congenital heart disease (CHD) for infants of women with preexisting diabetes. A retrospective review examined two tertiary care centers of diabetic pregnancies that recorded early hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) values (<20 weeks). The incidence of prenatally diagnosed CHD was calculated and stratified by HbA1c level. Poor glycemic control was defined as an HbA1c level of 8.5 % or higher. Fetal echocardiography was used to identify fetuses that resulted in infants with suspected CHD. Neonatal echocardiograms and pathology reports were reviewed for confirmation of the diagnosis. Of 535 patients, 30 (5.6 %) delivered an infant with confirmed CHD. Among the patients with poor glycemic control, 8.3 % (n = 17) delivered an infant with CHD, whereas 3.9 % (n = 13) of those with an HbA1c level lower than 8.5 % delivered an infant with CHD (p = 0.03). Poor glycemic control in early pregnancy is associated with an increased risk of CHD in offspring. The incidence of CHD in patients with adequate glycemic control still is sufficiently high to justify routine fetal echocardiography for all gravidas with preexisting diabetes regardless of HbA1c level.