Necrotizing pancreatitis complicated by retroperitoneal emphysema: two case reports.

BACKGROUND: Emphysematous pancreatitis is acute pancreatitis associated with emphysema based on imaging studies and has been considered a subtype of necrotizing pancreatitis. Although some recent studies have reported the successful use of conservative treatment, it is still considered a serious condition. Computed tomography (CT) scan is useful in identifying emphysema associated with acute pancreatitis; however, whether the presence of emphysema correlates with the severity of pancreatitis remains controversial. In this study, we managed two cases of severe acute pancreatitis complicated with retroperitoneal emphysema successfully by treatment with lavage and drainage. CASE PRESENTATION: Case 1: A 76-year-old man was referred to our hospital after being diagnosed with acute pancreatitis. At post-admission, his abdominal symptoms worsened, and a repeat CT scan revealed increased retroperitoneal gas. Due to the high risk for gastrointestinal tract perforation, emergent laparotomy was performed. Fat necrosis was observed on the anterior surface of the pancreas, and a diagnosis of acute necrotizing pancreatitis with retroperitoneal emphysema was made. Thus, retroperitoneal drainage was performed. Case 2: A 50-year-old woman developed anaphylactic shock during the induction of general anesthesia for lumbar spine surgery, and peritoneal irritation symptoms and hypotension occurred on the same day. Contrast-enhanced CT scan showed necrotic changes in the pancreatic body and emphysema surrounding the pancreas. Therefore, she was diagnosed with acute necrotizing pancreatitis with retroperitoneal emphysema, and retroperitoneal cavity lavage and drainage were performed. In the second case, the intraperitoneal abscess occurred postoperatively, requiring time for drainage treatment. Both patients showed no significant postoperative course problems and were discharged on postoperative days 18 and 108, respectively. CONCLUSION: Acute pancreatitis with emphysema from the acute phase highly indicates severe necrotizing pancreatitis. Surgical drainage should be chosen without hesitation in necrotizing pancreatitis with emphysema from early onset.

Robotic surgery contributes to the preservation of bowel and urinary function after total mesorectal excision: comparisons with transanal and conventional laparoscopic surgery.

BACKGROUND: Determine whether robotic surgery is more effective than transanal and conventional laparoscopic surgery in preserving bowel and urinary function after total mesorectal excision (TME). METHODS: Of 79 lower rectal cancer patients who underwent function-preserving TME between 2016 and 2020, 64 patients consented to a prospective questionnaire-based functional observation study (52 responded). At 6 months post-resection or ileostomy closure, Wexner, low anterior resection syndrome (LARS), modified fecal incontinence quality of life, and international prostate symptom scores were used to evaluate bowel and urinary function, comparing robotic surgery (RTME) with transanal (taTME) or conventional laparoscopic surgery (LTME). RESULTS: RTME was performed in 35 patients (54.7%), taTME in 15 (23.4%), and LTME in 14 (21.9%). While preoperative bowel/urinary functions were similar in all three procedures, and the distance from the anal verge to tumor was almost the same, more hand-sewn anastomoses were performed and the anastomotic height from the anal verge was shorter in taTME than RTME. At 2 years post-resection, 8 patients (12.5%) had a permanent stoma; RTME showed a significantly lower rate of permanent stoma than taTME (2.9% vs. 40%, p < 0.01). Despite no significant difference, all bowel function assessments were better in RTME than in taTME or LTME. Major LARS was observed in all taTME and LTME cases, but only 78.8% of RTME. No clear difference arose between RTME and taTME in urinary function; urinary dysfunction was more severe in LTME than RTME (36.4% vs. 6.1%, p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: In function-preserving TME for lower rectal cancer, robotic surgery was suggested to be more effective than transanal and conventional laparoscopic surgery in terms of bowel and urinary functions.

[A Case of Laparoscopic Hartmann's Procedure for Rectal Cancer with Inferior Mesenteric Vein-Left Ovarian Vein Shunt].

A 77-year-old woman presented with a chief complaint of bloody stools. Detailed examination revealed a semi-circumferential type 2 tumor in the lower rectum, and a diagnosis of Group 5, tub1-2, cT3N2aM0, cStage Ⅲb rectal cancer was made. Preoperative abdominal CT scans revealed a shunt in the inferior mesenteric vein and left ovarian vein. Laparoscopic Hartmann's procedure was performed, and when the sigmoid mesentery was moved from the inner side, a shunt flowing from the left ovarian vein to the inferior mesenteric vein in the sigmoid mesentery was found, which was then dissected. The operating time was 253 min, and blood loss was approximately 140 g. There was no postoperative liver dysfunction, and the patient was transferred to another hospital on postoperative day 36. Causes of portal-systemic shunts are portal hypertension occurring due to liver cirrhosis or congenital causes and organ adhesion from abdominal surgery. In this case, there was no liver cirrhosis, and the blockage of the left renal vein perfusion by the superior mesenteric artery may have resulted in congestion and varicose of the left ovarian vein. Furthermore, the shunt with the inferior mesenteric vein may have been formed due to the adhesion of the left ovarian vein after ovariectomy. If preoperative tests reveal varices, a surgical treatment is recommended while keeping in mind the possibility of shunt formation as in this case.

Effective dissection for rectal cancer with lateral lymph node metastasis based on prognostic factors and recurrence type.

PURPOSE: There are no reports showing the significance and effective range of dissection for patients with lateral lymph node metastasis (LLNM). This study aimed to investigate the indications for lateral lymph node dissection (LLND) in patients with LLNM based on prognostic factors and recurrence types. METHODS: We reviewed 379 patients with advanced rectal cancer who were treated with total mesorectal excision plus LLND. We analyzed background factors and survival times of patients who had LLNM to determine prognostic factors and recurrence types. RESULTS: Pathological LLNM occurred in 44 (11.6%). Among patients with LLNM, the predictors of poor prognoses, according to univariate analysis, were > 3 node metastases, the presence of node metastasis on both sides, and spreading beyond the internal iliac lymph nodes. Moreover, LLNM beyond the internal iliac region was found to be an independent prognostic risk factor. Twenty-eight of the 44 patients with lateral lymph node metastasis (64%) relapsed, 22 of whom had distant metastases and 11 of whom experienced local recurrences. Among the latter group, nine (20%) and two (5%) had recurrences in the central and lateral pelvis, respectively. CONCLUSION: The therapeutic benefit of resection was high, especially in patients with ≤ 3 positive lateral lymph nodes, one-sided bilateral lymph node areas, and positive nodes localized near the internal iliac artery.

[Significance of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy before Colorectomy and Hepatectomy].

BACKGROUND: We discuss the significance of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for resectable simultaneous liver metastases in our department. SUBJECT: We examined 73 cases of resectable simultaneous colorectal liver metastases surgeries occurred in our department from 2000 to 2019. RESULTS: There were 13 patients in the chemotherapy before colorectomy group(before colorectomy group), 24 patients in the chemotherapy before hepatectomy group(before hepatectomy group), and 36 patients in the no chemotherapy group(no chemo group). Five-year overall survival in Grade A/B was 77.8%/100% in the before colorectomy group, 50.0%/42.4% in the before hepatectomy group and 45.6%/66.2% in the no chemo group. Three-year progression-free survival in Grade A/B was 51.9%/50.0% in the before colorectomy group, 16.7%/40.4% in the before hepatectomy group and 46.5%/55.6% in the no chemo group. Six patients in the before colorectomy group had no local recurrence, lymph node recurrence, or peritoneal dissemination. CONCLUSION: Patients in the before colorectomy group were expected to have prolonged survival. There was no local recurrence, lymph node recurrence, or peritoneal dissemination in the before colorectomy group, suggesting the possibility of controlling them.

[Treatment for Laterally Invasive Rectal Cancer with Robot-Assisted Surgery after Preoperative Treatment].

The patient is a 40-year-old male. He was referred to our department because, after a thorough examination, he was diagnosed with rectal cancer. Preoperative imaging showed a tumor in the rectum at the level of the seminal vesicles, and left lateral invasion was suspected. In addition, lymph node metastases in the left lateral area were suspected. We performed a robot-assisted low anterior resection plus bilateral lateral dissection plus covering ileostomy for this patient after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The operation time was 495 minutes, and the blood loss was 50 g. The histopathological diagnosis was pT3, N3(#263), M0, pStage Ⅲc, PM0, DM0, RM0, R0, Cur A. In Japan, robotic-assisted surgery for rectal cancer has been covered by insurance since April 2018, and in our department, robotic surgery is the first option for any stage or type of surgery for rectal cancer. We believe that the greatest advantages of robotic surgery for rectal cancer are in lateral dissection, ie, the better understanding of how blood vessels and nerves travel around the internal iliac vessels and the associated anatomy of pelvic organs that comes from reliable lateral dissection. We have experienced a case of safe robotic-assisted radical resection of laterally invasive rectal cancer, which is considered to be relatively difficult, and we hereby report the usefulness of the robotic-assisted modality.

[The Validity of a Stent-Independent Strategy for Left-Sided Stenotic Colon Cancer].

In recent years, stenting and stoma creation as a bridge to surgery for obstructive left-sided colon cancer have been attracting attention. Our team has a stent-independent strategy and performs primary resection after stoma construction and preoperative chemotherapy with cT4 patients. In this study, we investigated both its validity and issues. Sixty-five cases of scope-impassable left-sided colon cancer surgeries from November 2015 to September 2020 were included. The short- and long-term results were examined in Stage Ⅱ-Ⅲ and Ⅳ. The median time from admission to surgery was 6 days and 8 days, respectively; postoperative morbidity was 9.5% and 17.4%, respectively; anastomotic leakage was 4.8% and 17.4%, respectively; permanent stoma was 26.2% and 21.7%, respectively; and postoperative death was zero in both groups. In group Ⅱ-Ⅲ, the 3-year overall survival rate was 77.0%, 3-year disease-free survival rate was 72.7%, and in group Ⅳ, the 3-year overall survival rate was 36.0%. Local recurrence was observed in 2(16.7%)of 12 patients with cT3-4N+ rectosigmoid cancer who did not receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The stent-independent strategy was safe with low morbidity, and the permanent stoma rate was reasonable.

[A survey of the otoacoustic emissions (OAEs) of workers exposed to noise in manufacturing factories].

OBJECTIVES: Otoacoustic emission (OAE) testing is not widespread in Japanese industrial health. This study examined the association between hearing thresholds (HTs) and OAEs among workers exposed to noise in actual workplaces. METHODS: In two metal products manufacturing factories, 34 workers with noise exposure in the workplace (exposure group, mean age 40.6 ± 9.4 years), and 9 workers with no noise exposure (control group, 49.0 ± 14.3 years) were surveyed. The time-weighted average (LAeq) and maximum (LAMAX) of environmental noise monitoring (ENM), and the time-weighted average (LTWA) and sound exposure level (LAE) of personal noise monitoring (PNM) were measured for each subject at the same time. As hearing effect indicators of noise exposure levels, HTs (0.5, 1, 2, 4 and 8 kHz) and distortion product OAEs (DPOAEs) (2, 3 and 4 kHz) were performed before and after 5 days of work. The results of the ENM, PNM, HTs and OAEs were compared between the groups using Student's t test, and their correlations were investigated using Pearson correlation coefficients. RESULTS: Noise exposure levels of the exposure group were significantly higher than those of the control group. In the exposure group, LAeq, LAMAX, LTWA and LAE were respectively 84.5 ± 4.1 dB(A),89.5 ± 6.3 dB(A), 83.4 ± 4.7 dB(A) and 153.1 ± 15.7 dB(A), and in the control group, they were 53.2 ± 2.6 dB(A), 56.4 ± 2.4 dB(A), 67.8 ± 5.6 dB(A) and 119.5 ± 5.6 dB(A). There was no difference between hearing effect indicators (HTs and OAEs) before and after work in either group. There was no correlation between the noise exposure level (LAeq, LTWA, LTWA and LAE) and HTs or OAEs, but there was a significant correlation between the HTs and OAEs at most of frequencies. The HTs and OAEs of subjects with noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) were significantly lower than those of subjects without NIHL. CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed there is a significant correlation of the HTs and OAEs before and after 5 days of work. In the future, OAE is expected to be used as a screening test of hearing management of noise-exposed workers in Japan.