Gram-Negative Bloodstream Infections in Healthcare: The Relationship Between Antibiotic Resistance, Mortality, and Novel Serological Biomarker.

BACKGROUND: Bloodstream infections caused by Gram-negative bacteria are highly mortal. In this study, we aimed to investigate the relationship between antimicrobial resistance profile and novel serological biomarkers and mortality in bloodstream infections (BSIs) caused by Gram-negative bacteria in intensive care units (ICUs). METHODS: 366 Patients diagnosed with healthcare-associated Gram-negative bloodstream infection in the ICUs of our hospital between February 2015 and December 2021 were included in the study. Demographic variables (age, gender, comorbidities), causative microorganisms and antimicrobial susceptibilities, time to first positive blood culture after hospitalization, length of stay in hospital, surgical procedures, laboratory data (hemograms, C-reactive protein (CRP) levels, albumin), and survival data were collected. Novel serological biomarkers were calculated. RESULTS: Mortality in Gram-negative bloodstream infection was found to be associated with age and novel serological biomarkers, but not with carbapenems and colistin minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values. Mortality rates increased with age (p˂0.001). Patients who died had higher C-reactive protein/albumin ratio (CAR) (p<0.001) and neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR) (p=0.009) and lower prognostic nutritional index (PNI) (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: The study emphasizes that resistance to colistin and carbapenems is not associated with mortality in BSIs caused by Gram-negative bacteria. Novel serological biomarkers may be useful in predicting mortality. These results support the need for further studies to elucidate the true impact of infections caused by resistant bacteria.

Multidrug resistance in pathogens of community-acquired urinary tract infections in Turkey: a multicentre prospective observational study

BACKGROUND: To have country-wide information about multidrug resistance (MDR) in isolates from community-acquired urinary tract infections (CAUTI) of Turkey, in terms of resistance rates and useful options. METHODS: We used a geocode standard, nomenclature of territorial units for statistics (NUTS), and a total of 1588 community-acquired isolates of 20 centres from 12 different NUTS regions between March 2019 and March 2020 were analysed. RESULTS: Of the 1588 culture growths, 1269 (79. 9%) were Escherichia coli and 152 (9.6%) were Klebsiella spp. Male sex, advancedage, and having two or more risk factors showed a statistically significant relation with MDR existence (p < 0.001, p: 0.014, p < 0.001, respectively) that increasing number of risk factors or degree of advancing in age directly affects the number of antibiotic groups detected to have resistance by pathogens. In total, MDR isolates corresponded to 36.1% of our CAUTI samples; MDR existence was 35.7% in E. coli isolates and 57.2% in Klebsiella spp. isolates. Our results did not show an association between resistance or MDR occurrence rates and NUTS regions. DISCUSSION: The necessity of urine culture in outpatient clinics should be taken into consideration, at least after evaluating risk factorsfor antibacterial resistance individually. Community-acquired UTIs should be followed up time- and region-dependently. Antibiotic stewardship programmes should be more widely and effectively administrated.

Antibiotic use and Influencing Factors Among Hospitalized Patients with COVID-19: A Multicenter Point-Prevalence Study from Turkey

Background: Broad-spectrum empirical antimicrobials are frequently prescribed for patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) despite the lack of evidence for bacterial coinfection. Aims: We aimed to cross-sectionally determine the frequency of antibiotics use, type of antibiotics prescribed, and the factors influencing antibiotics use in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 confirmed by polymerase chain reaction. Study Design: The study was a national, multicenter, retrospective, and single-day point prevalence study. Methods: This was a national, multicenter, retrospective, and single-day point-prevalence study, conducted in the 24-h period between 00:00 and 24:00 on November 18, 2020, during the start of the second COVID-19 peak in Turkey. Results: A total of 1500 patients hospitalized with a diagnosis of COVID-19 were included in the study. The mean age ± standard deviation of the patients was 65.0 ± 15.5, and 56.2% (n = 843) of these patients were men. Of these hospitalized patients, 11.9% (n = 178) were undergoing invasive mechanical ventilation or ECMO. It was observed that 1118 (74.5%) patients were receiving antibiotics, of which 416 (37.2%) were prescribed a combination of antibiotics. In total, 71.2% of the patients had neither a clinical diagnosis nor microbiological evidence for prescribing antibiotics. In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, hospitalization in a state hospital (p < 0.001), requiring any supplemental oxygen (p = 0.005), presence of moderate/diffuse lung involvement (p < 0.001), C-reactive protein > 10 ULT coefficient (p < 0.001), lymphocyte count < 800 (p = 0.007), and clinical diagnosis and/or confirmation by culture (p < 0.001) were found to be independent factors associated with increased antibiotic use. Conclusion: The necessity of empirical antibiotics use in patients with COVID-19 should be reconsidered according to their clinical, imaging, and laboratory findings.

Global threat of COVID 19 and evacuation of the citizens of different countries

Beginning from China on December 2019, COVID-19 epidemic has spreaded all over the world in a short period of time and has been a pandemic. In challenge with this pandemic quarantine technique has been used widely after tens of years. In the course of the pandemic, many countries evacuated their citizens from affected regions and combined the evacuation with quarantine process. Some examples of these countries who evacuated their citizens are Germany, Italy, Spain, and USA. In further times, during the course of pandemic, according to spread, other countries evacuated their citizens from these countries too. Despite being the origin of the pandemic, in later times Wuhan was also a place where people were evacuated to. Evacuation and quarantine have caused social and psychological impacts on people and some of them took place in mainstream media. In this review article, evacuation and quarantine processes as well as the society's reactions to these, have been compiled.

Predicting diabetic foot ulcer infection using the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio: a prospective study.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) may be used in the early stage risk assessment and follow-up in diabetic foot infection. METHODS: Over a five-year study, NLR values on admission and day 14 of treatment were matched with their laboratory and clinical data in a cohort study. Patients were followed-up or consulted in several clinics or polyclinics (infectious diseases). RESULTS: Admission time NLR was higher, in severe cases as indicated by both Wagner and PEDIS infection scores (severe versus mild Wagner score NLR 6.7 versus 4.2; p=0.04; for PEDIS score NLR 6.3 versus 3.6; p=0.03, respectively). In patients who underwent vascular intervention (12.6 versus 4.6; p=0.02); amputation indicated (9.2 versus 4.1; p=0.005) and healed afterwards (6.9 versus 4.3; p<0,001), when matched with others. NLR was also found to be correlated with duration of both IV antibiotic treatment (r=0.374; p=0.005) and hospitalisation (r=0.337; p=0.02). Day 14 NLR was higher in patients who underwent vascular intervention (5.1 versus 2.9; p=0.007) when matched to others. CONCLUSION: Patients with higher NLR values at admission had more severe diabetic foot infection, higher risk for amputation, need for long-term hospitalisation and aggressive treatment. However, they also have more chance of benefit from treatment.

Evaluation of Post-operative Meningitis: Comparison of Meningitis Caused by Acinetobacter spp. and Other Possible Causes.

AIM: To analyse postoperative meningitis (POM) after craniotomy, and to compare the clinical characteristics, treatment outcomes and mortality rates of POM that were caused by Acinetobacter spp. or other possible causes. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this study, POM cases in our hospital between 2008 and 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. Cases were divided into three groups; Acinetobacter spp. meningitis (case group), non-Acinetobacter bacterial meningitis (control group 1) and culture negative meningitis (control group 2). Demographic, clinical, laboratory features, treatment modalities and mortality rates were compared between case and control groups. RESULTS: A total of 112 patients with POM were included in the study. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) culture results were negative in 50 (44.6%) patients; bacteria were isolated from CSF of 62 (55.3%) patients. Acinetobacter spp. was isolated from 28 (45%) patients, while bacteria other than Acinetobacter spp. were detected in 34 (55%) patients. No significant differences were observed between case and control groups in terms of age, gender, comorbidity and operation type. For the case group, change of treatment according to culture result was significantly different from control groups (p < 0.001). Mortality was 55.6% in the case group, 24.2% in control group 1 (p=0.013), and 24% in control group 2 (p=0.006). In multivariate analysis, isolation of Acinetobacter spp. from CSF culture [OR < sub > adj < /sub > 5.2, 95% confidence interval (CI):1.2-22.0, p=0.026] and inappropriate treatment (OR < sub > adj < /sub > 15.7, 95%CI:3.6-68.9, p < 0.001) were determined to be independent risk factors for mortality. CONCLUSION: Postoperative meningitis, especially caused by Acinetobacter spp., and its inappropriate empirical treatment are associated with high mortality.

Retrospective investigation of 9 years of data on needlestick and sharps injuries: Effect of a hospital infection control committee.

BACKGROUND: The risk of occupational transmission of bloodborne pathogens to health care workers is primarily associated with needlestick and sharps injuries (NSIs). However, most NSIs are not reported, and most health care workers are not aware of postexposure procedures. METHODS: Data for NSIs reported in our hospital between 2008 and 2016 were reviewed retrospectively. RESULTS: A total of 546 staff members reported NSIs. Of these, 376 (68.9%) were women. NSIs were more commonly reported by trainee nurses (243 [44.5%]), followed by nurses (121 [22.2%]), cleaning staff (108 [19.8%]), and doctors (49 [9%]). The rate of postexposure interventions was 13% in 2008 and 92.6% in 2016 (P < .0001; χ2 = 82.866). NSI rates also show that the number of applications with NSIs increased over the years. When occupational blood exposure was examined, the number of bloodborne pathogens was 50 (9.3%) cases of hepatitis B virus, 30 (5.6%) cases of hepatitis C virus, 3 cases of Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever, 1 case of HIV, and 2 cases of hepatitis B virus and hepatitis C virus coinfection. DISCUSSION: Over the years, the increase in both the appropriate intervention rate and the number of reports to the hospital infection control committee after NSIs shows that regular training regarding NSIs is effective. CONCLUSIONS: Hospital infection control committees may play a more active role in raising awareness in this regard and thus reducing the rate of unreported NSIs.