Low prevalence of diabetes distress following total pancreatectomy with islet autotransplantation.

Diabetes distress (DD), or psychological fatigue associated with diabetes management, is common in type 1 and 2 diabetes mellitus and is associated with poor glycemic control. Diabetes distress has never been evaluated in patients undergoing total pancreatectomy with islet autotransplant (TPIAT) for chronic pancreatitis. We analyzed DD after TPIAT in 260 patients (average age 34.3 [standard deviation 15], 75.5% F) undergoing TPIAT between 2006 and 2014. Each patient completed 1 or more diabetes distress scale (DDS) questionnaires from 1 to 7 years post-TPIAT (631 total). We examined changes in DD over 7 years and also patient characteristics associated with DD 1 year post-TPIAT (n = 189). One year after TPIAT, 151 of 189 (80%) reported no or low distress (DD<2). Diabetes distress increased over time by an average of 0.084 (SE 0.017) points per year, an average 0.59 point increase from years 1 to 7 (P < .0001). Insulin-dependent patients had significantly greater DD 1 year post-TPIAT compared to insulin-independent patients (P < .0001). Higher DD was associated with poorer glycemic control as indicated by HbA1c (P < .0001). Prevalence of DD is low but increases over time after TPIAT. Insulin dependence and poorer glycemic control are associated with higher levels of DD.

Dose escalation study of the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of nemonoxacin (TG-873870), a novel potent broad-spectrum nonfluorinated quinolone, in healthy volunteers.

Nemonoxacin (TG-873870) is a novel nonfluorinated quinolone with potent broad-spectrum activity against Gram-positive and Gram-negative pathogens, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, penicillin- and quinolone-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae, and vancomycin-intermediate and vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. The safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of nemonoxacin were investigated in a double-blind, ascending-single-dose study involving 56 healthy subjects (48 males and 8 females) who were randomly assigned to 1 of 7 dose cohorts. In each successive cohort, two subjects received a placebo and six received single oral doses of 25, 50, 125, 250, 500, 1,000, or 1,500 mg nemonoxacin. Nemonoxacin was well tolerated up to the maximum dose of 1,500 mg. No severe or serious adverse events were observed. The most frequent adverse events were contact dermatitis, pruritus, and erythema. No clinically significant abnormalities were noted in the electrocardiograms, vital signs, or laboratory tests. The plasma concentrations increased over the dose range, and at 500 mg, the free area under the plasma concentration-time curve/MIC(90) ratios and free maximum nemonoxacin concentration/MIC(90) ratios against drug-sensitive/drug-resistant S. pneumoniae and S. aureus were greater than 227 and 24, respectively. The peak time and elimination half-life of nemonoxacin were 1 to 2 h and 9 to 16 h, respectively. The oral clearance was approximately 0.22 liter/h/kg. The plasma protein binding was approximately 16%. The results of this study support further evaluation of the multiple-dose safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of nemonoxacin.

Influence of ketoconazole on azimilide pharmacokinetics in healthy subjects.

AIM: To assess the influence of ketoconazole on azimilide pharmacokinetics. METHODS: A two-period randomized crossover study was conducted in healthy male and female subjects (19-45 years). Placebo or 200 mg ketoconazole were administered orally every 24 h for 29 days. On day 8, a single oral dose of 125 mg azimilide dihydrochloride was coadministered following an overnight fast. Blood samples were obtained prior to and for 22 days following azimilide dihydrochloride administration. The plasma protein binding of azimilide was also assessed at 6 h after dosing. RESULTS: Following ketoconazole administration, a 16% increase in azimilide AUC (90% confidence interval (CI) 112%, 120%), a 12% increase in C(max) (95% CI 107%, 116%), a 13% increase in t(1/2,z) (95% CI 107%, 120%) and a 14% decrease in CL(o) (95% CI 82%, 90%) were observed. CONCLUSIONS: The changes in azimilide pharmacokinetics following ketoconazole treatment are not clinically important since the 90% CI for the AUC fell within the prespecified range of 80-125%. Thus, no clinically important drug interactions are expected when azimilide dihydrochloride is coadministered with CYP3A4 inhibitors.

Influence of azimilide on CYP2C19-mediated metabolism.

The purpose of this study was to assess the influence of multiple-dose oral administration of azimilide dihydrochloride on CYP2C19-mediated metabolism. A two-period, randomized crossover study was conducted in 40 healthy male subjects who were phenotyped as extensive CYP2C19 metabolizers. Oral doses of placebo or 125 mg of azimilide dihydrochloride were administered every 12 hours for 3 days, followed by every 24 hours for 5 days; 20 mg omeprazole was coadministered on Day 8. Blood or plasma samples were obtained over 24 hours and analyzed for azimilide or omeprazole/5-hydroxyomeprazole using high-performance liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry. Data were analyzed using "noncompartmental" analysis. Azimilide blood concentrations observed in this study were similar to those previously observed at steady state in patients. Based on AUC(m)/AUC(p) for omeprazole, azimilide does not significantly inhibit CYP2C19-mediated metabolism (90% confidence interval [CI] = 104%-111%). For 5-hydroxyomeprazole, no significant changes in pharmacokinetics were observed. For omeprazole, a statistically significant decrease ( approximately 12%) was observed for AUC. However, this change was small and is not expected to be clinically important since the CI was contained within those used to establish bioequivalence. These results indicate that azimilide does not inhibit CYP2C19-mediated metabolism. Since this isozyme had the lowest in vitro IC(50) values for the cytochrome P450s most commonly involved with the metabolism of drugs (CYP1A2, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, CYP2D6, and CYP3A4), azimilide-related drug interactions mediated via these isozymes are not anticipated.

The effect of room-temperature storage on the stability of compounds in DMSO.

The stability of approximately 7200 compounds stored as 20-mM DMSO solutions under ambient conditions was monitored for 1 year. Compound integrity was measured by flow injection analysis using positive and negative electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. Each sample was assessed at the beginning of the study, after 12 months of storage, and at a randomized time point between the initial and final time points of the study. The relationship between length of storage and the probability of observing the compound was described by a repeated-measures logistic regression model. The probability of observing the compound was 92% after 3 months of storage at room temperature, 83% after 6 months, and 52% after 1 year in DMSO. An acceptable limit for compound loss and corresponding maximum storage time for samples in DMSO can be determined based on these results.

The effect of freeze/thaw cycles on the stability of compounds in DMSO.

A diverse set of 320 compounds from the Procter & Gamble Pharmaceuticals organic compound repository was prepared as 20-mM DMSO solutions and stored at 4 degrees C under argon in pressurized canisters to simulate a low-humidity environment. The plates were subjected to 25 freeze/thaw cycles while being exposed to ambient atmospheric conditions after each thaw to simulate the time and manner by which compound plates are exposed to the atmosphere during typical liquid-handling and high-throughput screening processes. High-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry with evaporative light-scattering detection was used to quantitate the amount of compound remaining after every 5th freeze/thaw cycle. Control plates were stored either at room temperature under argon or at 4 degrees C under argon without freeze/thaw cycling and were evaluated at the midpoint and the endpoint of the study. The study was conducted over a short time period (i.e., 7 weeks) to minimize the effect of compound degradation over time due to the exposure of the compounds to DMSO. The results from this study will be used to determine the maximum number of freeze/thaw cycles that can be achieved while maintaining acceptable compound integrity.