Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Gig Sanit ; 94(9): 39-41, 2015.
Article in Russian | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27029167

ABSTRACT

In the article there are presented the results of evaluation of radiation doses to the population of the Voronezh region from natural and man-made sources of ionizing radiation. It was established that in the structure of the collective dose of the population of the Voronezh region annually the dose from natural sources of ionizing radiation leads, ranging from 74.96% to 76.68%. According to the evaluation of indices characterizing the level of the impact of sources of ionizing radiation there was no recorded exceedance of statutory criteria.


Subject(s)
Hygiene , Radiation Injuries/prevention & control , Radiation Monitoring/methods , Radiation Protection/methods , Female , Humans , Male , Radiation Dosage , Radiation, Ionizing , Retrospective Studies , Russia
2.
Gig Sanit ; (1): 9-11, 2009.
Article in Russian | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19354178

ABSTRACT

The carcinogenic and noncarcinogenic risks to health were estimated in accordance with the requirements stated in the guide P 2.1.10.1920-04 "Guidelines for assessing the health risk in the population exposed to the chemicals polluting the environment" (approved by G. G. Onishchenko, state sanitary inspector on March 5, 2004) and comprised four successive steps: 1) identification of a hazard; 2) estimation of a dose-response relationship; 3) evaluation of exposure of the population to chemical substances; 4) characterization of a risk, by calculating the individual carcinogenic risk, hazard coefficients and indices characterizing the noncarcinogenic risk. The performed assessment of the health risk to the population living in the area exposed to the ambient air pollutant emissions by the AOA "Shinnyi Kompleks Amtel-Chenozymye" (Amtel-Chernozem Tyre Complex) allowed determination of priority pollutants, by taking into account their effect on human health. The individual carcinogenic risk to health has been found to be higher than the acceptable (safe) level (10-4) was due to the probable exposure to a 2-heptane fraction (nefras ChS 94/99) and hexavalent chromium. The highest non-carcinogenic risk to human was also due to the heptane fraction (nefras ChS 94/99) (hazard coefficient > 1).


Subject(s)
Environmental Illness/epidemiology , Industrial Waste/adverse effects , Risk Assessment/methods , Humans , Incidence , Industrial Waste/analysis , Industry , Models, Theoretical , Risk Factors , Russia/epidemiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...