Prevalence and Hypertension Treatment Schedule in Hemodialysis Patients and Renal Transplant Recipients in 2006 and 2014/2016.

BACKGROUND: Hypertension is often recognized in both hemodialysis patients (HDp) and renal transplant recipients (RTRs). The aim of the study was the evaluation of hypertension prevalence and treatment schedule and the achievement of the control of blood pressure according to the Polish Society of Hypertension, European Society of Hypertension, Joint National Committee, and American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association 2017 recommendations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Observations were done in 2 distinct periods of time: the year 2006 and the years 2014/2016. In 2006, 56 HDp and 316 RTRs were studied. In 2014/2016, 85 HDp and 818 RTRs were studied. The antihypertensive treatment analysis was based on medical records from visits in RTRs and dialyses in HDp. RESULTS: Cardiovascular diseases were diagnosed in 71.4% (2006) and 65.9% (2016) in HDp; 17.7% (2006) and 21.5% (2014) in RTRs. Diabetes was observed in 39.3% (2006) and 34.1% (2016) in HDp; 16.5% (2006) and 23.2% (2014) in RTRs. The target blood pressure control was achieved in 64.3% (2006) and 49.4% (2016) of HDp and in 61.4% (2006) and 45.7% (2014) of RTRs. Three drugs (28.6% and 33.5% in 2006; 30.6% and 29.1% in 2016/2014) or 2 antihypertensive drugs (19.6% and 26.9% in 2006; 22.4% and 27.1% in 2016/2014) were used in HDp and RTRs, respectively. The majority of HDp and RTRs were treated with ß-blockers followed by calcium channel blockers. CONCLUSIONS: The target blood pressure control was achieved in a low percentage of HDp and RTRs. RTRs required multidrug antihypertensive therapy to control blood pressure more often than HDp.

Management of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System Blockade in Kidney Transplant Recipients.

Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) are the cornerstone treatment in chronic kidney disease patients. Despite facilitating a reduction in blood pressure and albuminuria, there are insufficient data in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs). They are often administered for hypertension and polycythemia treatment. The aim of this study was to investigate the frequency and route of administration of ACEIs and ARBs and their early clinical effects in the KTR population. In a cross-sectional, retrospective study we analyzed 874 medical records of all KTRs treated in our unit in 2014. A total of 391 KTRs (44.7%) using ARBs or ACEIs were qualified for the study. The primary reasons for renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system antagonist administration were hypertension (59.1%), polycythemia (19.2%), and proteinuria (18.2%). Among the studied KTRs, 86.7% of patients were treated with ACEIs and 12.2% were treated with ARBs. The majority of patients treated with ACEIs and ARBs received these agents in a dose range below 25% and between 25% and 49% of their maximal dose, respectively. Both the mean serum creatinine level and estimated glomerular filtration rate (chronic kidney disease epidemiology collaboration) remained fairly stable and urine protein excretion (g/24 hours) was significantly reduced after 3 months of ACEI and ARB therapy. The serum potassium level increased significantly, while hemoglobin concentration dropped significantly. In KTRs, renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system antagonists were applied mainly due to hypertension, proteinuria, and polycythemia. ACEIs and ARBs were effective in the reduction of proteinuria and hemoglobin, but graft function was stable and the increase of serum potassium was not of clinical significance.

Native Nephrectomy in Renal Transplant Recipients With Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) represent about 10% of kidney transplant recipients (KTR) and have unique needs regarding acceptance for this procedure. Whether native kidney nephrectomy (NKN) affects kidney transplantation (KT) outcomes remains a matter of debate, and more data is needed to establish a standard approach to KTR with ADPKD. AIM: To analyze the prevalence, timing, and short- and long-term outcomes of NKN in a cohort of ADPKD recipients in a single institution. METHOD: Retrospective, observational study. RESULTS: In the years 1993 to 2016 we identified 162 KTR with ADPKD; of those, 149 had known NKN status. A high proportion of ADPKD KTR (n = 72) underwent NKN, the majority of which (69.4%) were performed before KT. There was no difference in short-term and long-term transplantation outcomes (including death, graft loss, delayed graft function, acute rejection, bacterial and cytomegalovirus [CMV] infection, and post-transplant diabetes mellitus) between NKN and non-NKN groups in a median of 98 months of follow-up. However, we found a significant difference in time on a waiting list, which was longer in the NKN group vs non-NKN. CONCLUSIONS: There is a need for a consensus regarding indications and timing for NKN in recipients with ADPKD. The systematic acquisition, sharing, and analysis of accessible data on NKN between institutions is an important step toward meeting this need. In our cohort, we found no impact of the NKN procedure on KT impact. However, undergoing NKN significantly prolonged the time on the waiting list.

Improvement of Blood Pressure Control in Renal Transplant Recipients-Retrospective Longitudinal Study.

BACKGROUND: Hypertension is a very common complication in renal transplant recipients (RTRs). It has been identified as a potent cardiovascular risk factor associated with impaired patient and graft survival. METHODS: A longitudinal retrospective analysis was performed to evaluate adherence to recommended blood pressure (BP) targets and to estimate the tendency in the management of hypertension from 2001 to 2015. A total of 96 RTRs (55 male, 41 female; overall mean age (2001), 41.66 ± 11.08 years; mean serum creatinine level, 1.45 ± 0.3 mg/dL; 41.2 ± 34.9 months after kidney transplantation) with diagnoses of hypertension and monitored continuously in the unit from 2001 to 2015 were included in the study. RESULTS: The average diastolic BP decreased (P < .01) and the average systolic BP did not change in this period. The target values of BP (ie, <140/90 mm Hg) were accomplished by 45.8% (2001) and 53.1% (2015) of patients. When the target BP was corrected by age (<150/90 mm Hg for people >65 years old) the adherence improved to 57.29% in 2015. The average number of antihypertensive agents used per patient increased significantly (P < .001): 2.03 ± 1.0 (2001) versus 2.69 ± 1.26 (2015). The most commonly used antihypertensive agents were beta-blockers: 69% and 74% in 2001 and 2015, respectively. There was a significant increase in the percentage of RTRs treated with the use of alpha-blockers (P < .01), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (P < .001), and angiotensin II receptor blockers (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: The study showed modest improvement of the hypertension control rate from 2001 to 2015 in RTRs. Greater efforts are needed to implement the guidelines, which would further improve patient and graft outcomes.