Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Clin Lung Cancer ; 8(8): 483-7, 2007 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17922972

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: This prospective randomized study compared overall survival (OS) in patients with previously untreated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) when treated with the platinum agent-based triple drug combination of paclitaxel/carboplatin/gemcitabine (PCG) versus the nonplatinum agent-based doublet drug combination of gemcitabine/vinorelbine. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Advanced (stages IIIB, IV, and recurrent) chemotherapy-naive patients with NSCLC and performance status 0-2 were randomly assigned to the PCG arm (paclitaxel 200 mg/m(2) on day 1, carboplatin area under the concentration-time curve of 5 on day 1, and gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8, every 21 days) or to the gemcitabine/vinorelbine arm (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8, and 15 and vinorelbine 25 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8, and 15, every 28 days). RESULTS: A total of 337 patients were randomly assigned to the 2 arms. The median time to progression was 6 months for PCG and 3.9 months for gemcitabine/vinorelbine with 1- and 2-year progression-free survival rates of 13% and 2% versus 14% and 4% (P = .324 log rank). Median OS for PCG was 10.3 months versus 10.7 months for gemcitabine/vinorelbine with 1-, 2-, and 3-year OS rates of 38%, 12%, and 2% versus 45%, 12%, and 6%, respectively (P = 0.269 log rank). Grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia, nausea/vomiting, myalgia/arthralgia, and neuropathy were significantly greater in the PCG arm. CONCLUSION: There was no difference in OS or progression-free survival when comparing PCG and gemcitabine/vinorelbine, and gemcitabine/vinorelbine was significantly less toxic. Gemcitabine/vinorelbine is a reasonable nonplatinum agent-based doublet therapy for patients with advanced NSCLC.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/drug therapy , Lung Neoplasms/drug therapy , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Carboplatin/administration & dosage , Deoxycytidine/administration & dosage , Deoxycytidine/analogs & derivatives , Disease-Free Survival , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Paclitaxel/administration & dosage , Prospective Studies , Survival Rate , Vinblastine/administration & dosage , Vinblastine/analogs & derivatives , Vinorelbine , Gemcitabine
2.
Cancer ; 104(9): 1992-7, 2005 Nov 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16130138

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The current study was performed to evaluate the activity of combination chemotherapy with gemcitabine and irinotecan in patients with previously treated carcinoma of an unknown primary site. METHODS: Patients with carcinoma of an unknown primary site who had received one previous chemotherapy regimen were eligible for this study. All patients received gemcitabine at a dose of 1000 mg/m2 intravenously (i.v.) and irinotecan at a dose of 100 mg/m2 i.v. on Days 1 and 8; treatment courses were repeated every 21 days. Patients were evaluated for response after completing two courses of treatment; responders/stable patients continued treatment for a recommended six courses. RESULTS: Forty patients entered this multicenter, community-based Phase II trial between September 2000 and July 2003. Four of these 40 patients (10%) achieved objective responses (a partial response in 3 patients and a complete response in 1 patient). An additional 17 patients (43%) had stable disease/minor response at first reevaluation; 7 of these patients (18%) remained stable for longer than 6 months. The median survival for the entire group was 4.5 months, with 1-year and 2-year survival rates of 25% and 13%, respectively. The treatment was well tolerated by most patients. Neutropenia was the most common Grade 3/4 toxicity (according to the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria, version 3.0) (occurring in 36% of patients). Myelosuppression-related complications were uncommon, as were severe nonhematologic toxicities. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of gemcitabine and irinotecan has modest activity and is well tolerated in patients with recurrent/refractory carcinoma of an unknown primary site. Treatment-related toxicity, particularly myelosuppression, appears to be less severe than toxicity produced by the taxane and platinum regimens frequently used in the first-line therapy of these patients. Evaluation of the gemcitabine and irinotecan combination as first-line therapy is indicated.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Camptothecin/analogs & derivatives , Carcinoma/drug therapy , Deoxycytidine/analogs & derivatives , Neoplasms, Unknown Primary/drug therapy , Adult , Aged , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Camptothecin/administration & dosage , Deoxycytidine/administration & dosage , Female , Humans , Irinotecan , Male , Middle Aged , Survival Analysis , Treatment Outcome , Gemcitabine
3.
Oncology (Williston Park) ; 17(5 Suppl 5): 36-40, 2003 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12800605

ABSTRACT

A phase I study of carboplatin (Paraplatin) administered in two different dosing schedules (single dose every 4 weeks and weekly dosing) in combination with weekly irinotecan (CPT-11, Camptosar) was conducted in patients with relapsed or refractory advanced malignancies. Fifty-three patients with a variety of tumor types were randomly enrolled on the two different treatment regimens and have received a total of 163 cycles of treatment to date. Twenty-six patients received weekly irinotecan in combination with a single fixed dose of every-4-week carboplatin (arm 1). Initially, patients received irinotecan on days 1, 8, and 15, in combination with fixed-dose carboplatin at an area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) of 5.5 (Calvert formula) on day 1 every 28 days. Due to dose-limiting toxicities encountered at the first two dose levels, the protocol was amended to decrease the fixed dose of carboplatin to an AUC of 4.0 every 4 weeks. Dose-limiting toxicity was again encountered, so the day-15 dose of irinotecan was eliminated from the dosing regimen. The recommended phase II dose for heavily pretreated patients is irinotecan at 60 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 in combination with carboplatin at AUC 4.0 on day 1 with cycles repeated every 28 days. Twenty-seven patients were treated with weekly irinotecan in combination with fixed-dose weekly carboplatin (arm 2). The initial dosing regimen consisted of irinotecan in combination with fixed-dose carboplatin at an AUC of 1.8 on days 1, 8, and 15, with treatment cycles repeated every 28 days. Due to the development of dose-limiting toxicities at the first two dose levels, the dosing regimen was subsequently amended to weekly irinotecan in combination with fixed-dose carboplatin at AUC 2.0 on days 1 and 8 only, and the dosing interval was shortened to every 21 days. With this amended regimen, the recommended phase II doses are irinotecan at 90 mg/m2 in combination with carboplatin at AUC 2.0 on days 1 and 8, with treatment cycles repeated every 21 days.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/administration & dosage , Camptothecin/analogs & derivatives , Camptothecin/administration & dosage , Carboplatin/administration & dosage , Adult , Aged , Antineoplastic Agents/toxicity , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/toxicity , Camptothecin/toxicity , Carboplatin/toxicity , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Drug Administration Schedule , Female , Humans , Irinotecan , Male , Maximum Tolerated Dose , Middle Aged , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...