Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 37
Filter
1.
Hum Reprod ; 39(2): 374-381, 2024 Feb 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37995381

ABSTRACT

STUDY QUESTION: What are the outcomes regarding health-related quality-of-life, mood, and marital relationship of recipients and donors 5 years after uterus transplantation (UTx) and uterus donation? SUMMARY ANSWER: Both recipients and donors generally demonstrated long-term stability regarding psychosocial outcomes but with negative deviations associated with unsuccessful outcomes. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: UTx is the first infertility treatment for women with absolute uterine factor infertility. The procedure can be performed with either a uterus donation from a live donor (LD), typically a close relative, or from a deceased, multi-organ donor. There are many potential stressful events over several years after UTx both for recipients and for LDs and these events may have impacts on quality-of-life and mental well-being. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This, prospective observational cohort study includes the nine recipients and LDs of the first human UTx trial. They were assessed in 2017-2018 by questionnaires 5 years after UTx. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: The nine recipients (ages 32-43 years) and their respective LDs (ages 44-67 years) were either related (n = 8) or friends (n = 1). Eight recipients had congenital uterine absence and one was hysterectomized due to cervical cancer. For two recipients, UTx resulted in early graft failures, while six of the other seven recipients gave birth to a total of eight babies over the following 5 years. Physical and mental component summaries of health-related quality-of-life were measured with the SF-36 questionnaire. Mood was assessed by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Relationship with partner was measured with the Dyadic Adjustment Scale. Comparisons were made between the values after 5 years and the values before uterus donation/transplantation. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Five years after primary UTx, the majority of recipients scored above the predicted value of the general population on quality-of-life, except for two women, one of whom had a viable graft but no live birth and one recipient who was strained by quality-of-life changes, possibly related to parenthood transitions. Regarding mood, only one value (anxiety) was above the threshold for further clinical assessment. Recipients showed declining satisfaction with their marital relationships, but all reported scores above the 'at risk for divorce' threshold at the time of the final assessment in our study. The LDs were all found to be stable and above the predicted value of the general population regarding mental components of quality-of-life. Three LDs showed declined physical components, possibly related to older age. Only one LD reported a value in mood (anxiety) that would need further assessment. The marital satisfaction of LDs remained stable and unchanged compared to baseline values. Notably, the two recipients with early graft failures, and their related LDs, regained their mental well-being during the first years after graft failure and remained stable after 5 years. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The restricted sample size and the single-centre study-design are limitations of this study. Additionally the study was limited to LD UTx, as opposed to deceased donor UTx. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Our study shows that both LDs and recipients had acceptable or favourable quality-of-life outcomes, including mood assessment, at the 5-year follow-up mark, and that failure to achieve a live birth negatively affected these modalities both for LDs and recipients. Moreover, an important finding was that LDs and recipients are not reacting with depression after hysterectomy, which is common after hysterectomy in the general population. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): Funding was provided by the Jane and Dan Olsson Foundation for Science, Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation, Handlanden Hjalmar Svensson Foundation, Swedish Governmental ALF Grant, and Swedish Research Council. There are no conflicts of interest to disclose. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01844362.


Subject(s)
Infertility, Female , Humans , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Prospective Studies , Infertility, Female/therapy , Uterus/abnormalities , Living Donors/psychology , Quality of Life
2.
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol ; 63(3): 418-424, 2023 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37029932

ABSTRACT

AIMS: The aim is to report the results of Australia's first uterus transplantation (UTx). METHODS: Following long-standing collaboration between the Swedish and Australian teams, Human Research Ethics approval was obtained to perform six UTx procedures in a collaborative multi-site research study (Western Sydney Local District Health 2019/ETH13038), including Royal Hospital for Women, Prince of Wales Hospital, and Westmead Hospital in New Souh Wales. Surgeries were approved in both the live donor (LD) and deceased donor models in collaboration with the inaugural Swedish UTx team. RESULTS: This is the first UTx procedure to occur in Australia, involving a mother donating her uterus to her daughter. The total operative time for the donor was 9 h 54 min. Concurrently, recipient surgery was synchronised to minimise graft ischaemic time, and the total operative time for the recipient was 6 h 12 min. Surgery was by laparotomy in the LD and recipient. The total warm ischaemic time of the graft was 1 h 53 min, and the cold ischaemic time was 2 h 17 min (total ischaemic time 4 h 10 min). The patient's first menstruation occurred 33 days after the UTx procedure. CONCLUSION: Twenty-five years of Swedish and Australian collaboration has led to Australia's first successfully performed UTx surgery at The Royal Hospital for Women, Sydney, Australia.


Subject(s)
Infertility, Female , Female , Humans , Sweden , Infertility, Female/surgery , Australia , Uterus/transplantation , Living Donors
3.
Reprod Biomed Online ; 45(5): 947-960, 2022 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35999148

ABSTRACT

Before the first live birth following uterus transplantation (UTx) in 2014, the 1-2% of women with an absent or non-functional uterus had no hope of childbearing. With 64 cases of UTx and 34 births reported in the scientific literature, this emerging technology has the potential for translation into mainstream clinical practice. However, limitations currently include donor availability, recipient suitability, surgical challenges regarding success and complications, and recipient management after UTx and during pregnancy. This review considers these challenges and ways to overcome them so that UTx could become part of the reproductive specialist's armamentarium when counselling patients with uterine factor infertility.


Subject(s)
Infertility, Female , Pregnancy , Humans , Female , Infertility, Female/etiology , Uterus/transplantation , Tissue Donors
4.
Front Surg ; 9: 854225, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35836605

ABSTRACT

Absolute uterus factor infertility, whether congenital or acquired, renders the woman unable to carry a child. Although uterus transplantation (UTx) is being increasingly performed as a non-vital procedure to address this unfortunate condition, the immunosuppression required presents risks that are further compounded by pregnancy and during the puerperium period. These vulnerabilities require avoidance of SARS-CoV-2 infection in pregnant UTx recipients especially during the third trimester, as accumulating evidence reveals increased risks of morbidity and mortality. Here we describe a successful UTx case with delivery of a healthy child, but in which both mother and neonate developed asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection seven days after RNA vaccination, on day 35 post-partum. Although the patient was successfully treated with a combination therapy comprised of two monoclonal antibodies, this case highlights the challenges associated with performing UTx in the era of Covid-19. More broadly, the risks of performing non-vital organ transplantation during a pandemic should be discussed among team members and prospective patients, weighing the risks against the benefits in improving the quality of life, which were considerable for our patient who achieved motherhood with the birth of a healthy child.

5.
Fertil Steril ; 118(3): 576-585, 2022 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35697530

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate reproductive, obstetric, and long-term health of the first completed study of uterus transplantation (UTx). DESIGN: Prospective. SETTING: University hospital. PATIENT(S): Nine live donor UTx procedures were conducted and seven were successful. Donors, recipients, and children born were observed. INTERVENTION(S): In vitro fertilization was performed with embryo transfer (ET) of day 2 or day 5 embryos in natural cycles. Pregnancies and growth trajectory of the children born were observed. Health-related quality of life, psychosocial outcome, and medical health of donors and recipients were evaluated by questionnaires. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The results of in vitro fertilization, pregnancies, growth of children, and long-term health of patients were reported. RESULT(S): Six women delivered nine infants, with three women giving birth twice (cumulative birth rates of 86% and 67% in surgically successful and performed transplants, respectively). The overall clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) and live birth rate (LBR) per ET were 32.6% and 19.6%, respectively. For day 2 embryos, the CPR and LBR per ET were 12.5% and 8.6%, respectively. For day 5 embryos, the CPR and LBR per ET were 81.8% and 45.4%, respectively. Fetal growth and blood flow were normal in all pregnancies. Time of delivery (median in full pregnancy weeks + days [ranges]) by cesarean section and weight deviations was 35 + 3 (31 + 6 to 38 + 0) and -1% (-13% to 23%), respectively. Three women developed preeclampsia and four neonates acquired respiratory distress syndrome. All children were healthy and followed a normal growth trajectory. Measures of long-term health in both donors and recipients were noted to be favorable. When UTx resulted in a birth, scores for anxiety, depression, and relationship satisfaction were reassuring for both the donors and recipients. CONCLUSION(S): The results of this first complete UTx trial show that this is an effective infertility treatment, resulting in births of healthy children and associated with only minor psychological and medical long-term effects for donors and recipients. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02987023.


Subject(s)
Cesarean Section , Quality of Life , Child , Female , Fertilization in Vitro/adverse effects , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Pregnancy , Prospective Studies , Uterus/transplantation
6.
Eur Radiol ; 32(4): 2360-2371, 2022 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34767069

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate uterine arteries (UA) of potential living donors for uterus transplantation (UTx) by comparison of CT angiography (CTA), digital subtraction angiography (DSA), and MR angiography (MRA) with care taken to minimize radiation doses. METHODS: Prospective donors for a clinical UTx trial were included. CTA, DSA, and MRA measurements in three predefined segments of the UAs were evaluated. Radiation doses were estimated and 1-year graft survival was recorded. RESULTS: Twelve potential donors (age 37-62 years) were investigated. There was no difference in visualized average UA lumen diameter when comparing CTA (mean 2.0 mm, SD 0.4), DSA (mean 2.1 mm, SD 0.6), and MRA (mean 2.0 mm, SD 0.3). MRA was not able to fully evaluate 10 (43%) out of 23 UA that proved to be patent on DSA. One UA was not identified by any of the modalities, and three MRA-absent UAs were identified by both CTA and DSA. The estimated mean effective dose was lower for DSA (5.1 mSv, SD 2.8) than CTA (7.1 mSv, SD 2.0), but not significantly (p value = 0.06). Three potential donors were excluded due to UA pathology and one due to adenomyosis. Eight donors underwent hysterectomy, with 1-year graft survival in six women. CONCLUSION: MRI including MRA should be the initial modality to examine potential UTx donors to acquire valuable details of uterine anatomy, and if UAs are fully visualized, there is no need for further angiographic methods with radiation. If UAs are not visualized by MRA, CTA may be performed and in selective cases with addition of the invasive modality DSA. KEY POINTS: • For uterine transplantation, pelvic MRI with MRA provides information of the uterine structure and of the diameters of uterine arteries in living donors. • Failure of MRA to demonstrate uterine arteries could be followed by CTA which will visualize the uterine arteries in a majority of cases. If MRA and additional CTA provide inconclusive results, the uterine arteries should be further evaluated by DSA. • Information of CTA can be used in the angio-system for DSA settings to minimize the radiation and contrast media doses.


Subject(s)
Computed Tomography Angiography , Living Donors , Adult , Angiography, Digital Subtraction/methods , Contrast Media , Female , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Angiography/methods , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Uterine Artery/diagnostic imaging , Uterus/diagnostic imaging , Uterus/transplantation
7.
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand ; 101(3): 355-363, 2022 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34907538

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The first live birth after uterus transplantation occurred in Sweden in 2014. Uterus transplantation has repeatedly, and at many centers worldwide, proven to be a feasible treatment for absolute uterine factor infertility. Hysterectomy in live donors and transplantation are well described in numerous reports. However, there are no reports of hysterectomy in the recipient after uterus transplantation, which will occur at either graft failure, after childbirth, or after numerous failed pregnancy attempts. We present the first report of hysterectomy in recipients after uterus transplantation with detailed analyses of findings in conjunction with graft failures. MATERIAL AND METHODS: An analysis of recipient hysterectomies (n = 10), performed in 2012-2020, was conducted. Data from the international uterus transplantation registry (ISUTx registry) were extracted, and medical records were systematically reviewed, to collect and compile characteristics of recipients and donors, as well as pre-, per-, and postoperative data, including clinical course of graft failures. RESULTS: Hysterectomy in recipients was performed in conjunction with cesarean section (n = 3), 3-6 months after cesarean section (n = 3), or after failed pregnancy attempts (n = 1) or graft failure (n = 3). The durations of anesthesia (2 h 36 min to 7 h 35 min) and hysterectomy surgery (1 h 42 min to 5 h 52 min) ranged widely, with long perioperative interruptions for insertion of ureteral catheters in two cases. Adhesions to the uterus were abundant, the majority being mild. Three uteri that subsequently showed graft failure (hysterectomy at 1, 3, and 8 months post transplantation) showed histological signs of ischemia in biopsies taken 1-week post-transplant and early signs of central hypoperfusion by Doppler ultrasound. In these graft failure explants, there were no epithelial linings in the uterine cavity or in the cervix. The inner uterine wall was severely ischemic and/or necrotic, whereas outer parts were partly viable. There were signs of moderate atherosclerosis of uterine arteries but no rejection. Mild postoperative complications were frequent (6/10), with one supravaginal hematoma requiring surgical drainage. CONCLUSIONS: Hysterectomy after uterus transplantation is a complex and time-consuming procedure, and perioperative ureteral catheters may be helpful. Histopathology of early cervical biopsies showing ischemic signs may indicate subsequent irreversible damage, leading to graft failure.


Subject(s)
Cesarean Section , Infertility, Female , Uterus , Cervix Uteri , Cesarean Section/adverse effects , Female , Graft Rejection , Humans , Hysterectomy/adverse effects , Infertility, Female/diagnosis , Infertility, Female/etiology , Infertility, Female/surgery , Living Donors , Pregnancy , Uterus/transplantation
8.
Curr Opin Organ Transplant ; 26(6): 640-645, 2021 12 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34593704

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Donor hysterectomy for live donor uterus transplantation was from the start performed by laparotomy, but minimal invasive surgery has entered the scene. In particular robotic-assisted laparoscopy is used since robotics is advantageous in the complex donor hysterectomy surgery in narrow space. This review covers the development and benefits of robotics and the published robotic donor hysterectomy experiences. RECENT FINDINGS: Robotic donor hysterectomy publications are scarce with eight cases in Sweden, five in USA, and one each in China and Spain. Robotics have been performed for either the entire donor hysterectomy or with conversion to laparotomy for the last steps of the surgical procedure. The total operative times are in line with open surgery, although a decrease is expected in the future. The estimated blood loss and hospital stays are less than at open surgery. The complication panorama includes hydronephrosis, ureteric fistula and pressure alopecia. Live births with healthy babies have been reported. SUMMARY: In uterus transplantation, robotic live donor hysterectomy has proven to be feasible, safe and associated with successful live births. The robotic donor hysterectomy is a low-volume procedure and an international registry to gather collective information is crucial for further evaluation and development.


Subject(s)
Laparoscopy , Robotic Surgical Procedures , Female , Humans , Hysterectomy/adverse effects , Laparoscopy/adverse effects , Laparotomy , Living Donors , Robotic Surgical Procedures/adverse effects
9.
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech ; 32(1): 140-144, 2021 Sep 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34581303

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Minimal invasive laparoscopic resection of liver tumors is less traumatic compared with open surgical resection and may be a better option for many patients. However, localization of intrahepatic tumors remains a challenge. Availability of hybrid operating rooms, equipped for high performance radiologic imaging, allows for new methods of surgical navigation. METHODS: Twelve patients planned for laparoscopic resection of liver tumors were included. Before resection started, tumors were marked with radiopaque fiducials. Four fiducials were positioned with ultrasound within 1 cm of the tumor. Tumor and fiducials were localized with contrast enhanced cone beam computed tomography. Fluoroscopy with an overlay of cone beam computed tomography markings was projected side-by-side on the same screen as the laparoscopic view to visualize tumor location. The fiducials were eventually removed. Laparoscopic ultrasound, the standard method of localizing a tumor, was also used. The benefits of the 2 visualization methods were estimated by the operator. Procedure times, radiation doses and resection margins were recorded. RESULTS: Fluoroscopy with radiopaque fiducials provided valuable information, complementing the laparoscopic ultrasound, particularly during the early phase of resection. In the later phase, mobilization of the tumor-containing liver segment caused significant displacement of the fluoroscopic overlay. The technique evolved during course of the study, with decreasing procedure times and radiation doses. Radical resection was achieved for all patients. CONCLUSIONS: Radiopaque fiducials and fluoroscopy can complement laparoscopic ultrasound for guiding resection of liver tumors. Combining radiologic and optical imaging in a hybrid operating suit may facilitate development of augmented reality techniques for surgical navigation.


Subject(s)
Laparoscopy , Liver Neoplasms , Surgery, Computer-Assisted , Fluoroscopy , Humans , Liver Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Liver Neoplasms/surgery , Tomography, X-Ray Computed
10.
Int J Gynecol Cancer ; 31(3): 371-378, 2021 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33649004

ABSTRACT

Cervical and endometrial cancer may impact women interested in future fertility in approximately 5-25% of cases. The recommended treatment for patients with early stage disease is hysterectomy and/or radiation leading to infertility. This is referred to as absolute uterine factor infertility. Such infertility was considered untreatable until 2014, when the first child was born after uterus transplantation. Thereafter, multiple births have been reported, mainly from women with Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome, with congenital uterine absence, although also from a patient with iatrogenic uterine factor infertility caused by radical hysterectomy secondary to an early stage cervical cancer 7 years before uterus transplantation. A live birth after uterus transplantation may be considered promising for many who may not otherwise have this option.Uterus transplantation is a complex process including careful patient selection in both recipients and donors, in vitro fertilization, and complex surgery in the organ procurement procedure including harvesting the vessel pedicles with the thin-walled veins. Thereafter, the transplantation surgery with anastomosis to ensure optimal blood inflow and outflow of the transplanted organ. Knowledge regarding immunosuppression and pregnancy is essential. Lastly there is the hysterectomy component as the uterus must be removed. Multidisciplinary teams working closely are essential to achieve successful uterus transplantation and, ultimately, delivery of a healthy child. Both the living and deceased donor concept may be considered and we address both the advantages and disadvantages. This review summarizes the animal research thus far published on uterus transplantation, the suggested recipient selections including former gynecologic cancer patients, the living and deceased donor uterus transplantation concepts with reported results, and updated fertility outcomes.


Subject(s)
Fertility Preservation/methods , Genital Neoplasms, Female/complications , Infertility, Female/etiology , Organ Transplantation/methods , Uterus/transplantation , Animals , Disease Models, Animal , Donor Selection/methods , Female , Humans , Living Donors , Organ Transplantation/adverse effects , Patient Selection , Pregnancy , Uterus/anatomy & histology , Uterus/blood supply
11.
Med Image Anal ; 69: 101946, 2021 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33454603

ABSTRACT

In laparoscopic liver resection, surgeons conventionally rely on anatomical landmarks detected through a laparoscope, preoperative volumetric images and laparoscopic ultrasound to compensate for the challenges of minimally invasive access. Image guidance using optical tracking and registration procedures is a promising tool, although often undermined by its inaccuracy. This study evaluates a novel surgical navigation solution that can compensate for liver deformations using an accurate and effective registration method. The proposed solution relies on a robotic C-arm to perform registration to preoperative CT/MRI image data and allows for intraoperative updates during resection using fluoroscopic images. Navigation is offered both as a 3D liver model with real-time instrument visualization, as well as an augmented reality overlay on the laparoscope camera view. Testing was conducted through a pre-clinical trial which included four porcine models. Accuracy of the navigation system was measured through two evaluation methods: liver surface fiducials reprojection and a comparison between planned and navigated resection margins. Target Registration Error with the fiducials evaluation shows that the accuracy in the vicinity of the lesion was 3.78±1.89 mm. Resection margin evaluations resulted in an overall median accuracy of 4.44 mm with a maximum error of 9.75 mm over the four subjects. The presented solution is accurate enough to be potentially clinically beneficial for surgical guidance in laparoscopic liver surgery.


Subject(s)
Augmented Reality , Laparoscopy , Surgery, Computer-Assisted , Animals , Imaging, Three-Dimensional , Liver/diagnostic imaging , Liver/surgery , Swine
12.
Sci Rep ; 10(1): 21343, 2020 12 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33288792

ABSTRACT

Living kidney donors' follow-up is usually focused on the assessment of the surgical and medical outcomes. Whilst the psychosocial follow-up is advocated in literature. It is still not entirely clear which exact psychosocial factors are related to a poor psychosocial outcome of donors. The aim of our study is to prospectively assess the donors' psychosocial risks factors to impaired health-related quality of life at 1-year post-donation and link their psychosocial profile before donation with their respective outcomes. The influence of the recipient's medical outcomes on their donor's psychosocial outcome was also examined. Sixty donors completed a battery of standardized psychometric instruments (quality of life, mental health, coping strategies, personality, socio-economic status), and ad hoc items regarding the donation process (e.g., motivations for donation, decision-making, risk assessment, and donor-recipient relationship). Donors' 1-year psychosocial follow-up was favorable and comparable with the general population. So far, cluster-analysis identified a subgroup of donors (28%) with a post-donation reduction of their health-related quality of life. This subgroup expressed comparatively to the rest, the need for more pre-donation information regarding surgery risks, and elevated fear of losing the recipient and commitment to stop their suffering.


Subject(s)
Kidney Transplantation/psychology , Living Donors/psychology , Adult , Cluster Analysis , Female , Humans , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Quality of Life , Risk Factors , Social Class
13.
Curr Opin Organ Transplant ; 25(6): 584-593, 2020 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33044349

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Uterus transplantation (UTx) is the first existing infertility treatment for women with no uterus and for women with a present nonfunctional uterus, which is unable to carry a pregnancy. This type of transplantation is a novel addition within the field of vascularized composite allografts and is the first ephemeral kind of transplantation, with the graft intended for only a restricted number of years, until the desired numbers of children have been born and with subsequent graft removal. The proof-of-concept of UTx, as an infertility treatment for women with uterine factor infertility, came with the report of the first live birth after UTx, occurring in Sweden in 2014. This UTx live birth has been followed by around 30 births, taking place in four continents. Despite the initial clinical success, UTx should still be regarded as an experimental procedure, at a developmental phase. The clinical UTx activities at several centers around the globe take place within scientific clinical trials and aim to advance UTx further. This review describes certain developmental areas around UTx. These relate to surgery, donor selection, assisted reproduction, and inclusion of new recipient groups. RECENT FINDINGS: Successful UTx procedures, with live births, have been reported both after live and deceased donor transplantation. There exist developments in the areas of robotic surgery for live donor hysterectomy, of alternate vascular connections to the graft, modifications of inclusion criteria/investigations of donors, assisted reproduction in conjunction with UTx, as well as discussions concerning expanding the pool of eligible recipients. SUMMARY: Uterus transplantation has repeatedly proven to be a feasible infertility treatment for women with absolute uterine factor infertility. Ongoing studies aim to increase safety and efficiency of the procedure as well as to better define suitable donors and recipients.


Subject(s)
Uterus/transplantation , Female , Humans
14.
J Clin Med ; 9(8)2020 Aug 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32756295

ABSTRACT

Uterus transplantation (UTx) can provide a route to motherhood for women with Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome (MRKHS), a congenital disorder characterized by uterovaginal aplasia, but with functional ovaries. Based on our four successful living-donor transplantations and two resulting births, this analysis presents parameters relevant to standardizing recipient/donor selection, UTx surgery, and postoperative treatment, and their implementation in routine settings. We descriptively analyzed prospectively collected observational data from our four uterus recipients, all with MRKHS, their living donors, and the two newborns born to two recipients, including 1-year postnatal follow-ups. Analysis included only living-donor/recipient pairs with completed donor/recipient surgery. Two recipients, both requiring ovarian restimulation under immunosuppression after missed pregnancy loss in one case and no pregnancy in the other, each delivered a healthy boy by cesarean section. We conclude that parameters crucial to successful transplantation, pregnancy, and childbirth include careful selection of donor/recipient pairs, donor organ quality, meticulous surgical technique, a multidisciplinary team approach, and comprehensive follow-up. Surgery duration and blood vessel selection await further optimization, as do the choice and duration of immunosuppression, which are crucial to timing the first embryo transfer. Data need to be collected in an international registry due to the low prevalence of MRKHS.

15.
Fertil Steril ; 114(5): 1097-1107, 2020 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32828495

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To perform a stepwise development of the surgical method for robotics-assisted laparoscopy in donor hysterectomy for uterus transplantation (UTx), a unique treatment for absolute uterine-factor infertility. DESIGN: Prospective observational study. SETTING: University hospital. PATIENT(S): Eight donors, aged 38-62 years, underwent surgery for retrieval of the uterus and vasculature. INTERVENTION(S): Robotics-assisted laparoscopy was performed in donors for 6-7 h with video recording. Conversion to laparotomy was performed for last parts of retrieval surgery. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Description, evaluation, and timing of 12 specific surgical steps, as well as surgical outcomes and complications. RESULT(S): There was a progression during the course of eight surgeries. In the initial two cases, seven and six items were completed with robotics compared with all 12 items in the last three procedures. The passive surgical time decreased from ∼20% in the first four cases to ∼8% in the last three procedures. The estimated median (range) blood loss, total surgical time, and length of hospital stay were, respectively, 125 mL (100-600), 11.25 h (10-13), and 5.5 days (5-6). Two reversible complications occurred: One patient acquired pressure alopecia, and one developed pyelonephritis. CONCLUSION(S): The study demonstrates a clear evolution of a strategy toward fully robotic donor surgery in UTx. This is likely to become the main approach in donor surgery of live UTx donors. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02987023.


Subject(s)
Hysterectomy/methods , Infertility, Female/surgery , Laparoscopy/methods , Organ Transplantation/methods , Robotic Surgical Procedures/methods , Uterus/transplantation , Adult , Female , Humans , Hysterectomy/trends , Infertility, Female/diagnosis , Laparoscopy/trends , Middle Aged , Organ Transplantation/trends , Prospective Studies , Robotic Surgical Procedures/trends , Sweden/epidemiology , Tissue Donors
16.
J Clin Med ; 9(8)2020 Jul 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32707899

ABSTRACT

Uterus transplantation has proved to be a feasible treatment for uterine factor infertility. Herein, we report on recipient outcome in the robotic uterus transplantation trial of 2017-2019. The eight recipients had congenital uterine aplasia. The donors were six mothers, one sister, and one family friend. Donor surgery was by robotic-assisted laparoscopy. Recipient surgery was by laparotomy and vascular anastomoses to the external iliacs. The duration (median (ranges)) of recipient surgery, blood loss, measured (left/right) uterine artery blood flow after reperfusion, and length of hospital stay were 5.15 h (4.5-6.6), 300 mL (150-600), 43.5 mL/min (20-125)/37.5 mL/min (10-98), and 6 days (5-9), respectively. Postoperative uterine perfusion evaluated by color Doppler showed open anastomoses but restricted blood distribution in two cases. Repeated cervical biopsies in these two cases initially showed ischemia and, later, necrosis. Endometrial growth was not seen, and hysterectomy was later performed, with pathology showing partly viable myometrium and fibrosis but necrosis towards the cavity. The other six patients acquired regular menstrual cyclicity. Surgery was performed in two patients to correct vaginal stenosis. Reversible rejection episodes were seen in two patients. In conclusion, the rate of viable uterine grafts during the initial 6-months of the present study (75%) leaves room for improvement in the inclusion/exclusion criteria of donors and in surgical techniques. Initial low blood flow may indicate subsequent graft failure.

17.
Fertil Steril ; 114(2): 407-415, 2020 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32709381

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To assess the psychosocial outcomes of recipients and their partners 2 and 3 years after entering this first clinical uterus transplantation study. DESIGN: Prospective observational study. SETTING: University hospital. PATIENT(S): Nine women with absolute uterine factor infertility and their male partners participated. INTERVENTION(S): Psychosocial evaluations using questionnaires focusing on health-related quality-of-life, mood, relationship, and fertility-related quality-of-life were conducted at 2- and 3-year follow-up after transplantation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Scores were obtained on the validated questionnaires 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Dyadic Adjustment Scale, and Fertility Quality of life measuring health-related quality-of-life, mood, relationship, and infertility-associated life quality, respectively. RESULT(S): There was a reversible decrease (at year 2) in the physical component of SF-36 concerning recipients, but not in partners. Negative deviations in the mental component of SF-36 were seen in four recipients, and in two of their partners at year 3, possibly related to the fact that live birth had not been achieved yet among three of these women. Childlessness also seemed to be related to reporting elevated anxiety scores. Most recipients and partners stated high satisfaction with marital relationship both at inclusion and at follow-up. CONCLUSION(S): The results of the present study show that even if the baseline psychosocial characteristics of the women to undergo transplantation and their partners were stable and equal or better compared with norm populations, graft failure and failure to achieve parenthood will pose psychological strains on couples in the period up to 3 years after transplantation. Psychological counseling should be offered past 3 years for recipients and their partners. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01844362.


Subject(s)
Infertility, Female/surgery , Mental Health , Quality of Life , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted , Spouses/psychology , Transplant Recipients/psychology , Uterus/transplantation , Abortion, Spontaneous/etiology , Affect , Female , Fertility , Graft Survival , Humans , Infertility, Female/diagnosis , Infertility, Female/physiopathology , Infertility, Female/psychology , Interpersonal Relations , Live Birth , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Rate , Prospective Studies , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted/adverse effects , Sweden , Time Factors , Treatment Failure , Uterus/physiopathology
18.
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand ; 99(9): 1222-1229, 2020 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32196630

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The proof-of-concept of uterus transplantation, as a treatment for absolute uterine factor infertility, came with the first live birth after uterus transplantation, which took place in Sweden in 2014. This was after a live donor procedure, with laparotomy in both donor and recipient. In our second, ongoing trial we introduced a robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery of the donor to develop minimal invasive surgery for this procedure. Here, we report the surgery and pregnancy behind the first live birth from that trial. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In the present study, within a prospective observational study, a 62-year-old mother was the uterus donor and her 33-year-old daughter with uterine absence as part of the Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome, was the recipient. Donor surgery was mainly done by robotic-assisted laparoscopy, involving dissections of the utero-vaginal fossa, arteries and ureters. The last part of surgery was by laparotomy. Recipient laparotomy included vascular anastomoses to the external iliac vessels. Data relating to in vitro fertilization, surgery, follow up, obstetrics and postnatal growth are presented. RESULTS: Three in vitro fertilization cycles prior to transplantation gave 12 cryopreserved embryos. The surgical time of the donor in the robot was 360 minutes, according to protocol. The durations for robotic surgery for dissections of the utero-vaginal fossa, arteries and ureters were 30, 160 and 84 minutes, respectively. The remainder of donor surgery was by laparotomy. Recipient surgery included preparations of the vaginal vault, three end-to-side anastomoses (one arterial, two venous) on each side to the external iliacs and fixation of the uterus. Ten months after transplantation, one blastocyst was transferred and resulted in pregnancy, which proceeded uneventfully until elective cesarean section in week 36+1 . A healthy boy (Apgar 9-10-10) was delivered. Follow up of child has been uneventful for 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first report of a live birth after use of robotic-assisted laparoscopy in uterus transplantation and is thereby a proof-of-concept of use of minimal invasive surgery in this new type of transplantation.


Subject(s)
Organ Transplantation/methods , Robotic Surgical Procedures/methods , Uterus/transplantation , Adult , Female , Fertilization in Vitro , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Laparoscopy , Live Birth , Living Donors , Male , Middle Aged , Pregnancy , Prospective Studies
20.
Rev. med. Rosario ; 85(2): 81-87, mayo-ago. 2019.
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-1053299

ABSTRACT

El factor uterino absoluto como causa de infertilidad, ya sea la ausencia de útero o la presencia de útero no funcional, es actualmente una patología con posibilidad de tratamiento. El primer intento de trasplante uterino en humanos fue en el año 2000, este falló y el útero necrótico tuvo que ser removido luego de 99 días. Este caso pionero inspiró a varios grupos de investigación alrededor del mundo para comenzar estudios en animales para investigar el trasplante uterino en relación a cirugía, inmunosupresión, rechazo y resultados obstétricos. El primer estudio clínico de trasplante uterino comenzó en Suecia en el año 2013 donde se realizaron nueve procedimientos a partir de donantes vivas. El primer nacido vivo en el mundo a partir de un trasplante uterino se reportó en septiembre del año 2014, luego se comunicaron dos nacimientos más en noviembre de ese mismo año. Desde ese momento se han reportado nacimientos de trasplantes uterinos en Suecia, Estados Unidos y Brasil. El caso de nacido vivo en Brasil es el primer y único nacimiento en el mundo cuya donante fue cadavérica. Todos los casos publicados de trasplante uterino y nacidos vivos serán revisados en detalle en este artículo. En el año 2016 se realizó el primer simposio de trasplante uterino en América Latina bajo el auspicio de la Asociación Latinoamericana de Medicina Reproductiva (ALMER). En ese encuentro, el equipo de la Universidad de Gotemburgo, Suecia, compartió su experiencia en trasplante uterino en humanos. Este fue nuestro puntapié para comenzar un trabajo colaborativo entre nuestro equipo en Rosario y el equipo de Suecia, con la intención de preparar un estudio científico de trasplante uterino en Argentina. Los pasos importantes para este procedimiento serán revisados en este artículo (AU)


Absolute uterine factor infertility, due to absence or non-function of the uterus, is now treatable. The first attempt of human uterus transplantation was in year 2000, but it failed and a necrotic uterus had to be removed after 99 days. This pioneering case inspired several research groups around the globe to initiate animal-based studies to investigate uterus transplantation in relation to surgery, immunosuppression, rejection and pregnancy outcome. The first clinical trial of uterus transplantation was initiated in Sweden in 2013 and involved nine live donor procedures. The world ́s first live birth was reported from that trial in September 2014 and this was followed by two more births within the trial in November 2014. Births after uterus transplantation has since then been reported from Sweden, USA and Brazil. The live birth in Brazil is the first and only birth from a deceased donor so far. All published cases of uterus transplantation and the live births will be review in detail.In 2016 there was the first symposium on uterus transplantation in Latin-America under the auspice of ALMER. At the meeting, the Swedish team shared their experiences of human uterus transplantation. This was the starting point for a collaboration work between our team in Rosario and the Swedish team, with the aim to prepare for a scientific trial of uterus transplantation in Argentina. The important steps in this procedure will be reviewed (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Uterus/transplantation , Argentina , Sweden , Transplants/history , Infertility, Female , International Cooperation
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...