The Safety of Aztreonam Versus Ceftazidime in Patients Labeled With Penicillin Allergy: A Cohort Study.

PURPOSE: Penicillin allergy is the most common drug allergy among hospitalized patients. Traditionally, aztreonam is recommended for patients labeled with penicillin allergy (PLWPA) in our institutional empirical antibiotic guidelines. Due to a global aztreonam shortage in December 2022, the antimicrobial stewardship unit recommended ceftazidime as a substitute. There is a paucity of real-world data on the safety profile of ceftazidime in PLWPA. Hence, we evaluated tolerability outcomes of ceftazidime use in PLWPA. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study compared PLWPA in Singapore General Hospital who received aztreonam (October 2022-December 2022) or ceftazidime (December 2022-February 2023). Patients were stratified according to their risk of allergic reaction (AR) based on history of penicillin allergy. The severity of AR was based on the Delphi study grading system. The primary outcome was development of AR after initiation of aztreonam or ceftazidime. The secondary tolerability outcomes include hepatotoxicity and neurotoxicity. FINDINGS: There were 168 patients in the study; 69 were men (41.1%) and the median age was 69 years (interquartile range: 59-76 years). Incidence of AR was statistically similar in both arms: 1 of 102 patients (0.98%) in the aztreonam arm vs 2 of 66 patients (3.03%) in the ceftazidime arm (P = 0.33). The patient in the aztreonam arm was deemed at medium risk of having an AR and developed localized rashes (grade 1). Both patients in the ceftazidime arm were deemed at high risk of AR and developed localized skin reaction (grade 1). Hepatotoxicity was observed in 1 patient prescribed aztreonam. No patients in the ceftazidime arm developed adverse events. IMPLICATIONS: Ceftazidime appears to be better tolerated and cheaper compared with aztreonam in PLWPA, and serves as an antimicrobial stewardship strategy to conserve broader-spectrum antibiotics use.

Pharmacokinetics of levetiracetam in neurosurgical ICU patients.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: The pharmacokinetics (PK) of drugs is dramatically altered in critical illness. Augmented renal clearance (ARC), a phenomenon characterized by creatinine clearance (CrCl) greater than 130 ml/min/1.73m2, is commonly described in critically ill patients. Levetiracetam, an antiepileptic drug commonly prescribed for seizure prophylaxis in the neurosurgical ICU, undergoes predominant elimination via the kidneys. Hence, we hypothesize that current dosing practice of intravenous (IV) levetiracetam 500 mg twice daily is inadequate for critically ill patients due to enhanced drug elimination. The objectives of our study were to describe the population PK of levetiractam using a nonparametric approach to design an optimal dosing regimen for critically ill neurosurgical patients. METHODS: This was a prospective, observational, population PK study. Serial blood samples were obtained from neurosurgical ICU patients who received at least one dose of IV levetiracetam. We used uHPLC to analyze these samples and Pmetrics™ software to perform PK analysis. RESULTS: Twenty subjects were included, with a median age of 54 years and CrCl of 104 ml/min. A two-compartmental model with linear elimination adequately described the profile of levetiracetam. Mean clearance (CL) was 3.55 L/h and volume of distribution (V) was 18.8 L. No covariates were included in the final model. Monte Carlo simulations showed a low probability of target attainment (PTA, trough at steady state of ≥6 mg/L) with a standard dose of 500 mg twice daily. A dose of at least 1000 mg twice daily was required to achieve 80% PTA. Two subjects, both with subtherapeutic trough levels, developed early onset seizures. CONCLUSION: Our study examined the population PK of levetiracetam in a critically ill neurosurgical population. We found that this population displayed higher clearance and required higher doses to achieve target levels.

Who listens and who doesn't? Factors associated with adherence to antibiotic stewardship intervention in a Singaporean tertiary hospital.

INTRODUCTION: Antibiotic stewardship programmes (ASPs) can improve patient outcomes by prospective audit and feedback with interventions. However, adherence to ASP interventions is not mandatory. Identifying factors associated with improved adherence may help to enhance ASP recommendations and activities. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted, comprising all ASP interventions performed as part of the prospective audit and feedback strategy in our institution (an acute tertiary-care hospital in Singapore) from January 2016 to July 2018. Adherence to ASP intervention was ascertained based on documented compliance with the recommended interventions within 48h. Factors associated with adherence to ASP interventions, such as patient demographics, clinical condition, type of infection, and characteristics of ASP interventions were identified using the χ2 test for categorical variables. On multivariate analysis, factors independently associated with adherence to ASP intervention were identified using logistic regression. RESULTS: Adherence to ASP intervention was 81.9% (5758/7028). On univariate and multivariate analysis, interventions coupled with direct communication via phone call (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.61, 95% CI 1.23-2.08) were associated with higher odds of adherence, whereas admission to a surgical unit, intervention involving carbapenem use, and recommendation to de-escalate or discontinue antibiotics were associated with lower odds of adherence to ASP interventions. CONCLUSION: Although adherence rates to ASP interventions were relatively high, interventions made to the surgical unit and recommendations related to carbapenem use were not so well received. Interventions communicated verbally via phone call were well received, highlighting the need for a close working relationship between ASP teams and hospital physicians.

The utility of voriconazole therapeutic drug monitoring in a multi-racial cohort in Southeast Asia.

OBJECTIVES: Voriconazole serum concentration, which is affected by several factors, is associated with treatment response and toxicity. There is paucity of data on voriconazole therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) among Southeast Asians, who exhibit a higher prevalence of CYP2C19-poor metabolisers compared with Caucasians and East Asians. Hence, there are concerns for higher risk of voriconazole accumulation and toxicity. We aim to determine the utility of voriconazole TDM through establishing: (1) proportion of patients achieving therapeutic troughs without dose adjustments; (2) characterisation of patients with sub-therapeutic, therapeutic and supra-therapeutic levels; (3) appropriate dose titrations/dose required for therapeutic troughs; (4) correlation between troughs and adverse events, treatment response/fungal breakthrough. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A single-centre retrospective analysis of data from adults (≥21 years old) with ≥1 voriconazole trough measured at Singapore General Hospital from 2015 to 2017 was performed. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients (45.7%) among 70 patients achieved therapeutic troughs (defined as 2.0-5.5 mg/L) without dose adjustments. Eleven patients (15.7%) experienced hepatotoxicity (troughs 0.5 to >7.5 mg/L). Neurotoxicity occurred in three patients (4.3%) (troughs ≥6.7 mg/L) and all patients had symptom resolution upon dose reduction. Treatment failure of invasive fungal infection appeared less in patients with therapeutic troughs compared with sub-therapeutic troughs (11.4% vs. 14.2%). Two patients experienced treatment failure despite supra-therapeutic voriconazole troughs. CONCLUSIONS: TDM should be implemented due to significant unpredictability in dose exposure. TDM can reduce unnecessary switches to alternatives due to intolerability and rule in the possibility of resistant organisms in the event of treatment failure despite therapeutic troughs, alerting clinicians to switch to alternatives promptly.