ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The use of different expressions between physicians frequently results in confusion in the process of diagnosis and treatment of patients with headaches due to problems in the nose and nasal cavity. The aim of this study was to assess the terminologies that have been used most frequently to standardize these terminologies. METHODS: Terminologies that are most frequently used in general, including rhinogenic migraine, sinus headache, rhinogenic contact point headache, middle turbinate headache syndrome, and rhinogenic headache, were found by searching PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. These terminologies were objectively assessed on the basis of existing research and definitions and the range of diagnoses by organizations with public credibility. RESULTS: There were many terminologies in use for headache related to nose; however, these were not logical expressions and only partly explained the phenomenon. Among the terms, "rhinogenic headache" was most appropriate in expressing and describing the related symptoms. CONCLUSION: The results indicated that the term "rhinogenic headache" is most appropriate for describing pain in the nose and eyes in patients with deformation within the nose or the nasal cavity due to external injuries or underlying diseases related to nose as observed on computed tomography.
Subject(s)
Facial Pain/etiology , Headache/etiology , Migraine Disorders/etiology , Nose Diseases/complications , Terminology as Topic , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Nasal Cavity , Nose Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Paranasal Sinus Diseases/complications , Paranasal Sinus Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Turbinates , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Minimizing scarring has long been a challenge in plastic surgery. Factors affecting scar formation are well known, but the effect of some patient-specific factors such as dermal thickness remains unverified. Management of factors predictive of scarring can improve postoperative patient satisfaction and scar treatment. METHODS: For 3 years, we used ultrasonography to measure dermal thickness in female patients who had undergone thyroidectomy for cancer at our hospital. We confirmed the influence of dermal thickness on hypertrophic scar formation and the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale scar score 6 months after surgery. RESULTS: There was a positive correlation between dermal thickness and scar score (p<0.05), and dermal thickness appears to be a cause of hypertrophic scar formation (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: Thick dermis was found to cause poor scar formation and hypertrophic scarring. Prediction of factors that can influence scar formation can be used to educate patients before surgery and can help in scar management and improvement in patient satisfaction.
