Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 12 de 12
Filter
1.
Clin Orthop Surg ; 16(3): 485-493, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38827755

ABSTRACT

Background: Sagittal talar translation is an important factor influencing the sagittal alignment of total ankle arthroplasty (TAA). Thus, accurate measurement of sagittal talar translation is crucial. This study proposes a simple method (tibiotalar distance [TTD]) that can quantify talar translation without being affected by the ankle and subtalar joint condition or the talar component position in patients with TAA. Methods: We enrolled 280 eligible patients (296 ankles) who underwent primary TAA between 2005 and 2019 and retrospectively reviewed them for sagittal talar translation. The TTD was measured for each patient on weight-bearing lateral ankle radiographs by 3 raters. In addition, we analyzed interrater and intrarater reliability for the TTD method. Results: We found that the TTD method could quantify the talar translation and was not affected by the preoperative condition of the ankle joint surface, subtalar joint pathologies, or the postoperative talar component position. The TTD method showed an excellent intraclass correlation coefficient (> 0.9) in all interrater and intrarater reliability analyses. In the analysis of 157 healthy, unoperated contralateral ankles, we identified that TTD showed a Gaussian distribution (p = 0.284) and a mean of 38.91 mm (normal range, 29.63-48.20 mm). Conclusions: The TTD method is a simple and reliable method that could be applied to patients with TAA to assess the sagittal talar translation regardless of the pre-and postoperative joint condition and implantation status.


Subject(s)
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Ankle , Talus , Humans , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Ankle/methods , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Aged , Talus/diagnostic imaging , Talus/surgery , Adult , Reproducibility of Results , Tibia/diagnostic imaging , Tibia/surgery , Ankle Joint/diagnostic imaging , Ankle Joint/surgery , Aged, 80 and over , Radiography
2.
Clin Orthop Surg ; 15(4): 589-596, 2023 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37529200

ABSTRACT

Background: Revision total knee arthroplasty (RTKA) is a technically demanding procedure for failed primary TKA. Posterior-stabilized (PS) and constrained condylar knee (CCK) articulations are commonly used for RTKA, but comparison of these articulations in RTKA is scarce. The aim of this study was to compare survival rates and clinical outcomes of RTKAs using PS articulation and CCK articulation. Methods: This study conducted a retrospective analysis of 86 RTKAs (PS, n = 41; CCK, n = 45) with a mean follow-up of 9.15 ± 2.79 years. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the Hospital for Special Surgery score, Knee Society Score, and The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index at final follow-up. The survival rate of each group was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox-hazard progression model. Results: Clinical outcomes were improved in both groups without significant difference. Twelve patients had orthopedic complications (4 in PS group and 8 in CCK group). Eight of them underwent re-RTKA (3 in PS group and 5 in CCK group). The articulation design did not influence the failure. The estimated 10-year survival rate was 92.7% in the PS group and 88.2% in the CCK group with no significant difference (p = 0.60). Also in septic failure, there was no significant difference in survival rate (92.7% in PS group and 92.5% in CCK group, p = 0.87). The hazard ratio in the PS group was not significantly different (p = 0.607). Conclusions: In RTKA, both PS and CCK showed similar survival rates and clinical outcomes at a mean follow-up of 9.2 years. Implant articulation did not affect the outcomes when properly indicated.


Subject(s)
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee , Knee Prosthesis , Humans , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/methods , Survival Rate , Knee Prosthesis/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies , Follow-Up Studies , Prosthesis Failure , Reoperation , Prosthesis Design , Knee Joint/surgery
3.
Clin Orthop Surg ; 15(2): 219-226, 2023 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37008971

ABSTRACT

Background: The number of revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has been increasing. Although many studies have analyzed the causes of revision TKA in Western countries, a limited number of studies have analyzed changes in causes of or trends in revision TKA in Asia. This study analyzed and determined the frequency and causes of failures after TKA in our hospital. We also analyzed the differences and trends over the past 17 years. Methods: A total of 296 revision TKAs performed in a single institution from 2003 to 2019 were analyzed. During the 17-year study period, patients who had undergone primary TKA between 2003 and 2011 were classified into a past group, while those who had undergone primary TKA from 2012 to 2019 were classified into a recent group. A revision performed within 2 years after primary TKA was defined as early revision. Further, differences in causes of revision TKA according to the interval from primary TKA to revision TKA were determined. The causes of revision TKA were analyzed through a comprehensive analysis of patients' medical records. Results: Overall, infection was the most common cause of failure (151/296 cases, 51.0%). Compared to the past group, the recent group had a relatively higher proportion of patients undergoing revision TKA for mechanical loosening (past group, 19.1% vs. recent group, 31.9%) and instability (11.2% vs. 13.5%) and a relatively lower proportion of patients undergoing revision TKA for infection (56.2% vs. 48.8%), polyethylene (PE) wear (9.0% vs. 2.9%), osteolysis (2.2% vs. 1.9%), and malalignment (2.2% vs. 1.0%). On comparison according to the interval from primary TKA to revision TKA, the rate of infection relatively decreased, whereas the rate of mechanical loosening and instability relatively increased in the late revision TKA compared to the early revision TKA. Conclusions: Infection and aseptic loosening were the most common reasons of revision TKA in both past and recent groups. Compared to the past, revision TKA due to PE wear has decreased significantly and revision TKA due to mechanical loosening has relatively increased recently. Orthopedic surgeons need to be aware of recent trends in mechanisms of failure and should try to recognize and address the probable causes in TKA.


Subject(s)
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee , Knee Prosthesis , Humans , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/adverse effects , Knee Prosthesis/adverse effects , Risk Factors , Retrospective Studies , Prosthesis Failure , Reoperation/adverse effects , Polyethylene , Knee Joint/surgery
4.
J Arthroplasty ; 38(3): 456-463, 2023 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36265722

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to investigate the association between the extent of subchondral bone marrow edema (BME), as classified by magnetic resonance imaging, and intermediate to long-term outcomes after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) for medial compartment osteoarthritis. METHODS: We enrolled 150 knees (144 patients) that underwent fixed-bearing UKA between April 2003 and December 2014 with a minimum follow-up of 5 years; the mean overall follow-up duration was 10 years (range, 5-18 years). We divided the patients into 2 groups based on the presence or absence of preoperative BME. Patients were also subdivided into 4 groups according to their BME scores determined by the magnetic resonance imaging Osteoarthritis Knee Score method. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) and the Forgotten Joint Score. Furthermore, survival rates and relevant risk factors that affect joint survivorship were analyzed. RESULTS: The groups with BME demonstrated significantly worse postoperative WOMAC pain and Forgotten Joint Scores at the final follow-up than the group without BME (all P < .05). We also found significant differences among the scores of groups with different BME grades (all P < .05). Post hoc analysis demonstrated differences between groups 1 and 2, 1 and 3, 1 and 4, and 2 and 4 (all P < .05) with a significant correlation between postoperative clinical outcomes and the extent of BME (r = 0.430 [WOMAC pain], r = -0.342 [Forgotten Joint Score]; P < .05). The survival rate was 95.4% for a mean period of 10 years for the UKAs, and the UKA survival was not associated with the presence of BME (P = .232; log-rank test). CONCLUSION: At a mean of 10 years, preoperative BME negatively impacted the clinical outcomes, especially pain, after UKA. However, UKA contributed to excellent survival rates for the same duration of follow-up, regardless of BME severity. Although this study does not provide any evidence that preoperative BME should be identified as a contraindication, evaluation of BME can provide crucial information about the expected outcomes.


Subject(s)
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee , Knee Prosthesis , Osteoarthritis, Knee , Humans , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/adverse effects , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/methods , Osteoarthritis, Knee/pathology , Bone Marrow/pathology , Knee Joint/surgery , Knee Joint/pathology , Pain, Postoperative/etiology , Edema/etiology , Treatment Outcome , Retrospective Studies
5.
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc ; 30(1): 208-218, 2022 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33492407

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare clinical and second-look arthroscopic outcomes between bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) augmentation and human umbilical cord blood-derived mesenchymal stromal cell (hUCB-MSC) implantation in high tibial osteotomy (HTO) for medial compartmental knee osteoarthritis and identify the relationship between articular cartilage regeneration and HTO outcomes. METHODS: A total of 176 patients who underwent HTO combined with a BMAC or hUCB-MSC procedure for medial compartment osteoarthritis (Kellgren-Lawrence grade 3) between June 2014 and September 2018 with a minimum follow-up of 2 years were reviewed. After HTO, multiple holes were drilled at cartilage defect sites of the medial femoral condyle (MFC), and then prepared BMAC or hUCB-MSCs in combination with scaffolds were implanted in the MFC lesions. After propensity score matching based on sex, age, body mass index, and lesion size, 55 patients in each of the BMAC and hUCB-MSC groups were successfully matched. Second-look arthroscopic findings were assessed according to the International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) Cartilage Repair Assessment (CRA) grading system and Koshino staging system. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Short-Form 36 (SF-36), and Tegner activity scores. RESULTS: At a mean follow-up of 33 months, clinical outcomes including IKDC, KOOS, SF-36, and Tegner activity scores were significantly improved in both groups (p < 0.001); however, there were no differences between the two groups. Second-look arthroscopy showed better healing of regenerated cartilage in the hUCB-MSC group (Grade I [4 cases, 9.1%]; Grade II [30 cases, 68.2%]; Grade III [11 cases, 22.7%]) than in the BMAC group (Grade I [1 case, 2.7%]; Grade II [20 cases, 54.1%]; Grade III [11 cases, 29.7%]; Grade IV [5 cases, 13.5%]) according to the ICRS CRA grading system (p = 0.040). There was no significant intergroup difference in terms of defect coverage based on the Koshino staging system (p = 0.057). Moreover, ICRS CRA grades at second-look arthroscopy were significantly correlated with clinical outcomes (r = - 0.337; p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: There were no significant differences in the clinical outcomes between the two groups. Both treatments provided similar, reliable outcomes in terms of pain relief, functional scores, and quality of life at a mean follow-up of 33 months. However, hUCB-MSC implantation was more effective than BMAC augmentation for articular cartilage regeneration.


Subject(s)
Cartilage, Articular , Mesenchymal Stem Cells , Osteoarthritis, Knee , Arthroscopy , Bone Marrow , Cartilage, Articular/surgery , Fetal Blood , Humans , Knee Joint , Quality of Life , Second-Look Surgery , Treatment Outcome
6.
J Bone Joint Surg Am ; 104(4): 316-325, 2022 02 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34767542

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The purpose of the present study was to determine the relationship between preoperative medial meniscal extrusion, as classified according to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and medial opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy outcomes at intermediate-term follow-up. METHODS: We reviewed the records for 212 patients who had undergone medial opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy for the treatment of medial compartment osteoarthritis between January 2009 and September 2014, with a minimum duration of follow-up of 5 years. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to the presence of pathologic medial meniscal extrusion (>3 mm). Moreover, patients were divided into 4 groups according to MRI Osteoarthritis Knee Score (MOAKS) criteria and relative medial meniscal extrusion values. Associations between the extent of preoperative medial meniscal extrusion and clinical outcomes over a mean duration of follow-up of 8.1 years were evaluated with use of Spearman rank correlation analysis. Regression analyses were performed to determine preoperative characteristics relevant to medial meniscal extrusion. Clinical outcomes were assessed with use of the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and the Tegner activity scale score. RESULTS: Postoperative KOOS pain scores were significantly different in the pathologic and non-pathologic medial meniscal extrusion groups (69.9 ± 18.0 versus 79.2 ± 11.4, respectively; p < 0.001). Additionally, the degree of preoperative medial meniscal extrusion based on both classification methods and the postoperative KOOS pain score were significantly correlated (r = -0.404 and -0.364; p < 0.001). Despite the inferior clinical outcomes associated with greater preoperative medial meniscal extrusion, medial opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy was associated with significant improvement in all outcome measures between the preoperative and latest follow-up assessments (p < 0.001). Preoperative meniscal patterns, including horizontal flap, complex, and root tears (p = 0.001), and increased Kellgren-Lawrence grade (p < 0.001) were related to the severity of medial meniscal extrusion. The survival rate was 94.8% at a mean of 8.1 years, and survival was not associated with the grade of medial meniscal extrusion as assessed with either classification scheme. CONCLUSIONS: At intermediate-term follow-up, greater preoperative medial meniscal extrusion was related to inferior postoperative clinical outcomes, specifically pain, after medial opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy. Despite the inferior results associated with preoperative medial meniscal extrusion, medial opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy was associated with a satisfactory survival rate after a mean of 8.1 years, regardless of the extent of medial meniscal extrusion. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.


Subject(s)
Knee Joint/surgery , Menisci, Tibial/diagnostic imaging , Osteoarthritis, Knee/surgery , Osteotomy/methods , Tibia/surgery , Female , Humans , Knee Joint/diagnostic imaging , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Male , Middle Aged , Osteoarthritis, Knee/diagnostic imaging , Pain Measurement , Retrospective Studies , Tibia/diagnostic imaging
7.
J Foot Ankle Surg ; 61(2): 345-349, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34801379

ABSTRACT

Various nonoperative treatments have been implemented to reduce pain and improve the quality of life in patients with ankle osteoarthritis. Among these treatments, intra-articular hyaluronate injection has proven efficacy and safety in patients with knee osteoarthritis. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and complications of hyaluronate injection using various clinical scoring systems. This study included 37 patients with unilateral ankle osteoarthritis (grade 2 or 3 according to the Takakura classification) who did not respond to previous pharmacological treatment. 3 weekly hyaluronate injections (2 mL Hyruan Plus®) were administered. The efficacy of intra-articular hyaluronate injection was evaluated on the basis of patient-reported foot and ankle clinical assessment at a mean follow-up of 13.8 ± 8.3 (range 6-33) months. Ankle Osteoarthritis Scale scores for pain and disability, American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society ankle-hindfoot scores, and visual analog scale for pain significantly improved at the final follow-up compared to that before intra-articular hyaluronate injection (p ≤ .05). When patients were dichotomized according to age, sex, body mass index, symptom duration, and Takakura classification, all these factors were not related to clinical outcomes. This study suggests that 3 weekly intra-articular hyaluronate injections can be performed safely to reduce pain and improve function without serious complications in patients with early or intermediate-grade ankle osteoarthritis when patients inadequately respond to medication. Larger controlled studies are needed to clarify the effects of hyaluronate injection and identify patients who can benefit most from hyaluronate injection.


Subject(s)
Hyaluronic Acid , Osteoarthritis, Knee , Ankle , Humans , Injections, Intra-Articular , Osteoarthritis, Knee/drug therapy , Prospective Studies , Quality of Life , Treatment Outcome
8.
Bone Joint J ; 103-B(11): 1686-1694, 2021 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34719267

ABSTRACT

AIMS: To determine the relationship between articular cartilage status and clinical outcomes after medial opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy (MOHTO) for medial compartmental knee osteoarthritis at intermediate follow-up. METHODS: We reviewed 155 patients (155 knees) who underwent MOHTO from January 2008 to December 2016 followed by second-look arthroscopy with a mean 5.3-year follow-up (2.0 to 11.7). Arthroscopic findings were assessed according to the International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) Cartilage Repair Assessment (CRA) grading system. Patients were divided into two groups based on the presence of normal or nearly normal quality cartilage in the medial femoral condyle: good (second-look arthroscopic) status (ICRS grade I or II; n = 70), and poor (second-look arthroscopic) status (ICRS grade III or IV; n = 85) groups at the time of second-look arthroscopy. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), and 36-Item Short Form survey. RESULTS: Significant improvements in all clinical outcome categories were found between the preoperative and second-look arthroscopic assessments in both groups (p < 0.001). At the latest follow-up, the mean IKDC and WOMAC scores in the good status group further improved compared with those at the time of second-look arthroscopic surgery (p < 0.001), which was not shown in the poor status group. The mean IKDC (good status, 72.8 (SD 12.5); poor status, 64.7 (SD 12.1); p = 0.002) and mean WOMAC scores (good status, 15.7 (SD 10.8); poor status, 21.8 (SD 13.6); p = 0.004) significantly differed between both groups at the latest follow-up. Moreover, significant correlations were observed between ICRS CRA grades and IKDC scores (negative correlation; p < 0.001) and WOMAC scores (positive correlation; p < 0.001) at the latest follow-up. Good cartilage status was found more frequently in knees with the desired range of 2° to 6° valgus correction than in those with corrections outside this range (p = 0.019). CONCLUSION: Second-look arthroscopic cartilage status correlated with clinical outcomes after MOHTO at intermediate-term follow-up, despite the relatively small clinical differences between groups. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(11):1686-1694.


Subject(s)
Arthroscopy , Cartilage, Articular/pathology , Osteoarthritis, Knee/surgery , Osteotomy/methods , Second-Look Surgery/methods , Tibia/surgery , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
9.
J Orthop Surg Res ; 16(1): 636, 2021 Oct 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34689815

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Adhesive skin materials have increasingly been used in orthopedic surgery. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of skin adhesive (2-octyl cyanoacrylate and polymer mesh, Dermabond Prineo) and interrupted polypropylene sutures for wound closure in patients undergoing total ankle arthroplasty (TAA). METHODS: We prospectively enrolled 107 consecutive patients (108 ankles) undergoing TAA and divided them into two groups: skin adhesive group (36 ankles) and suture group (72 ankles). The primary outcome assessment included wound complications and patient satisfaction for wound cosmesis. The secondary outcome assessment included duration of surgery, length of hospital stay, and the Ankle Osteoarthritis Scale (AOS) pain and disability score. RESULTS: There was one case of allergic contact dermatitis, three cases of wound dehiscence, and one case of superficial surgical site infection in the skin adhesive group. Among them, one case each with allergic contact dermatitis and wound dehiscence finally progressed to deep surgical site infection. Three cases of wound dehiscence were also reported in the suture group; however, there was no case of surgical site infection. Patient satisfaction for wound cosmesis was significantly higher in the skin adhesive group than in the suture group (p = 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of secondary outcomes (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Although the use of Dermabond Prineo showed better patient satisfaction for wound cosmesis, it showed significantly high wound complication rates and no other clinical benefits compared to interrupted polypropylene suture in TAA. Our results suggest that awareness of the possibility of wound complications is necessary when Dermabond Prineo is used in TAA.


Subject(s)
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Ankle , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact , Suture Techniques , Tissue Adhesives , Adhesives/adverse effects , Ankle , Cyanoacrylates , Humans , Polypropylenes , Surgical Wound Infection , Sutures , Tissue Adhesives/adverse effects
10.
Orthop J Sports Med ; 9(9): 23259671211023099, 2021 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34541008

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Residual rotational instability after isolated anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) has been a challenge for many years. Anterolateral extra-articular procedures (AEAPs), including anterolateral ligament reconstruction (ALLR) or lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET), are performed as a surgical option for additional rotational stability, but clear evidence for their usefulness is lacking. PURPOSE: To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature regarding the efficacy of AEAP in primary ACLR. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: A literature search, data extraction, and quality assessment were conducted by 2 independent reviewers. MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were searched in April 2020, following the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. A total of 3444 studies were screened, and 20 studies (11 randomized controlled trials and 9 nonrandomized studies) were evaluated. Functional outcomes, stability, and complications were compared between patients who underwent primary ACLR with AEAP and those who underwent isolated primary ACLR. For subgroup analysis, outcomes were compared according to AEAP technique (ALLR vs LET) and time from injury to surgery (≤12 vs >12 months). The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool, Jadad scale, and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. RESULTS: Compared with isolated ACLR, combined ACLR with AEAP led to improved pivot-shift grades and graft failure rates, regardless of the AEAP technique or of time from injury to surgery. A limited, marginal improvement in subjective function score was observed in patients who underwent AEAP combined with ACLR. In contrast to ALLR, patients who underwent LET combined with ACLR had an increased risk of knee stiffness and adverse events. CONCLUSION: Our review suggests that when there is a need to improve rotational stability and subjective function, AEAP combined with primary ACLR can be considered regardless of time from injury. ALLR appeared to be a better option for improving rotational stability compared with LET.

11.
Front Pediatr ; 9: 638059, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34336730

ABSTRACT

Congenital clasped thumb is a progressive flexion and adduction deformity presenting with heterogeneous congenital abnormalities and syndromes. This deformity is usually accompanied by first web space narrowing and metacarpophalangeal joint (MPJ) laxity. Understanding the various features of the clasped thumb and making an accurate diagnosis is essential for treatment. Depending on the classification, treatment can vary from conservative to surgical. We describe the case of a bilateral clasped thumb with various characteristics, which were treated differently according to the disease type. The deformity of the clasped thumb was bilateral, and the patient had MPJ flexion deformity, flexor pollicis longus shortening, first web space narrowing, and MPJ instability, which were confirmed through a stress test. The left thumb was a complex type and was surgically treated, whereas, the right thumb was a flexible type, which was treated with splinting; the treatment showed promising results at 2 years post surgery. Diagnosis of the clasped thumb through thorough history taking, physical examination and considering its characteristics, and appropriate classification of the disease is essential for treatment. Furthermore, a stress test can identify MPJ instability in the congenital clasped thumb.

12.
J Bone Joint Surg Am ; 102(23): 2068-2076, 2020 Dec 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33060426

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The relationship between preoperative subchondral bone marrow edema (BME) in the osteoarthritic knee and pain has been established. However, little is known about the influence of preoperative BME on outcomes after medial opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy (MOHTO). The purpose of this study was to clarify the association between preoperative BME severity and clinical outcomes after MOHTO at intermediate follow-up. METHODS: We reviewed the cases of 105 consecutive patients who underwent MOHTO for osteoarthritis of the knee with preoperative subchondral BME in the medial aspect of the tibia between January 2005 and December 2015. BME was evaluated using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The sizes of the BME lesions were determined on the basis of the maximum diameter and were classified as small (<1 cm), medium (<2 cm), large (<4 cm), or very large (diffuse; >4 cm). Associations between preoperative BME severity and postoperative outcomes at a mean follow-up of 6.2 years (range, 2.0 to 14.3 years) were evaluated according to a Spearman correlation matrix with each reviewer's grades. Functional outcomes were assessed using the Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) score, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Knee Society Score (KSS), and Short Form-12 (SF-12) questionnaire. Survival rate and complications were also evaluated. RESULTS: The degree of preoperative BME was not significantly correlated with postoperative outcomes (p > 0.05). There were significant improvements between the preoperative and latest follow-up assessments in all functional outcome categories (p < 0.001). Patients demonstrated marked improvements with respect to pain, function, and quality of life. The overall survival rate was 95.2%, with a mean follow-up of 6.2 years. Six major complications were identified in 5.7% of the patients, and these resulted in 5 patients (4.8%) who had conversion to total knee arthroplasty. CONCLUSIONS: We did not find any correlation between preoperative subchondral BME severity and postoperative outcomes. MOHTO showed good functional outcomes, a low major complication rate, and an excellent survival rate with a mean follow-up of 6.2 years, regardless of the degree of preoperative BME. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.


Subject(s)
Bone Marrow Diseases/complications , Edema/complications , Osteotomy/methods , Tibia/surgery , Bone Marrow Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Edema/diagnostic imaging , Female , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Male , Middle Aged , Osteoarthritis, Knee/complications , Osteoarthritis, Knee/surgery , Retrospective Studies , Tibia/pathology , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...