ABSTRACT
In recent years, the utility of vascular complement factor 4d (C4d) deposition as diagnostic tool for antibody mediated rejection (AMR) after lung transplantation, has become a controversial issue. We aimed to pinpoint the problematic nature of C4d as biomarker with a simple experiment. We quantified C4d in broncho-alveolar lavage (BAL) of lung transplant patients with diverse post-transplant complications in 3 different settings of clinically clear cases of: 1/ chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD); 2/ acute complications acute rejection (AR), lymphocytic bronchiolitis (LB), antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) and respiratory infection (INF); 3/ patients with parallel C4d immunostaining and Anti-HLA. All groups were compared to BAL of stable patients. C4d was measured via standard ELISA. C4d was increased in CLAD, predominantly in RAS (p = 0.0026) but not in BOS (p = 0.89). C4d was increased in all acute events, AR (p = 0.0025), LB (p < 0.0001), AMR (p = 0.0034), infections (p < 0.0001). In patients with parallel C4d immunostaining and serum HLA antibodies, C4d was increased in C4d-/HLA- (p = 0.0011); C4d-/HLA+ (p = 0.013); HLA+/C4d + (p = 0.0081). A correlation of systemic C-reactive protein (CRP) with C4d was found in all patients (r = 0.49; p < 0.0001). We hypothesize that free C4d in BAL may only be representative of a general immune response in the transplanted lung.
Subject(s)
Allografts/immunology , Biomarkers/metabolism , Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid/chemistry , Complement C4b/metabolism , Graft Rejection/immunology , Lung Transplantation , Peptide Fragments/metabolism , Respiratory System/metabolism , Adult , C-Reactive Protein/metabolism , Chronic Disease , Diagnosis, Differential , Female , HLA Antigens/immunology , Humans , Isoantibodies/metabolism , Male , Middle AgedABSTRACT
It is unknown whether strategies validated for diagnosing pulmonary embolism (PE) are valid in patients with a history of PE. It was the objective of this study to investigate whether a diagnostic algorithm consisting of sequential application of a clinical decision rule (CDR), a quantitative D-dimer test and computed tomography (CT) safely ruled out a clinical suspicion of acute recurrent PE. Data were obtained from a diagnostic outcome study of patients suspected of PE. Acute recurrent PE was ruled out by an unlikely probability of PE (CDR score
