Differences Between Resting State fMRI BOLD Variability and Default Mode Network Connectivity in Healthy Older and Younger Adults.

BACKGROUND: Resting state fMRI analyses have been used to examine functional connectivity in the aging brain. Recently, fluctuations in the fMRI BOLD signal have been used as a potential marker of integrity in neural systems. Despite its increasing popularity, the results of BOLD variability analyses and mean based functional connectivity analyses have rarely been compared. The current study examined fMRI BOLD signal variability and default mode network seed-based analyses in healthy older and younger adults to better understand the unique contributions of these methodological approaches. METHODS: 34 healthy participants were separated into a younger adult group (age 25-35, n=17) and an older adult group (age 65+, n=17). For each participant, a map of the standard deviation of the BOLD signal (SDBOLD) was derived. Group comparisons examined differences in resting-state SDBOLD in younger versus older adults. Seed-based analyses were used to examine differences between younger and older adults in the default mode network. RESULTS: Between-group comparisons revealed significantly greater BOLD variability in widespread brain regions in older relative to younger adults. There were no significant differences between younger and older adults in the default mode network connectivity. CONCLUSION: The current findings align with an increasing number of studies reporting greater BOLD variability in older relative to younger adults. The current results also suggest that the traditional resting state examination methods may not detect nuanced age-related differences. Further large-scale studies in an adult lifespan sample are needed to better understand the functional relevance of the BOLD variability in normative aging.

Integration of sex/gender and utilization of ecological Momentary assessment of cognition in clinical populations: a scoping review.

Objectives: We aimed to describe the methods of smartphone-based cognitive ecological momentary assessment designs in clinical populations, with an intention to evaluate how the role of sex and/or gender has been considered in the design and analyses, particularly including female-specific physiology. Methods: This scoping review was conducted based on JBI scoping review methodology. On March 2nd, 2023, we searched for literature across four databases. Screening of the results and data extraction were conducted in duplicate according to the a priori methods in the pre-registered protocol. Results: 31 articles were included in this review. Participants ranged in age from 15-85 years old with various clinical disorders. Prompts were given between 1-7 times per day for 7-84 days. Executive function was the most frequently assessed cognitive domain. Over half the studies (n = 17, 55%) did not investigate the effects of sex and/or gender, and only one study considered the impact of hormonal therapy. Many studies (n = 14, 45%) used sex and gender interchangeably or incorrectly. Conclusions: Studies varied in design, with heterogeneity in the reporting of methodological information. The lack of attention to sex/gender on neuropsychological outcomes can lead to confusion and contradiction regarding its potential impact on cognition in clinical populations. This may hinder the identification of effective interventions for those assigned female at birth who have been overlooked or considered indistinguishable from their male counterparts. Given the well-documented impact of sex/gender on cognition, it is essential that future neuropsychological research, especially EMA-based studies, prioritize investigating sex/gender to ensure better outcomes for all.

Functional near infrared spectroscopy activation during an executive function task differs between healthy older and younger adults.

Background: Healthy aging can include declines in processing speed and executive function. Further research is needed to characterize the neurobiological underpinnings of these cognitive changes in older adulthood. The current study used functional near infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS), an optical neuroimaging technique, to examine differences in cerebral oxygenation between healthy older adults (OA) and younger adults (YA) during a measure of cognitive interference. Methods: Thirty-four participants were sampled from two age groups: YA (mean age = 28.1 years, SD = 2.8, F = 9) and OA (mean age = 70.9 years, SD = 5.4, F = 9). Participants completed the Multi-Source Interference Task (MSIT), a measure of executive function with high and low-demand conditions, while undergoing fNIRS recordings using a TechEn CW6 system with 34-source-detector channels, situated over the prefrontal cortex. Functional activation patterns, accuracy, and reaction time were compared between and within groups for each condition. Results: Behaviourally, during the control condition, OA and YA had comparable accuracy, although OA had significantly slower reaction times than YA. During the interference condition, OA had significantly lower accuracy and slower reaction times than YA. Results demonstrated a significant difference between groups with an age-related increase in HbO for OA in both conditions (p < 0.05). Within groups, OA showed greater activation during the control condition, while YA demonstrated greater activation during the interference condition. Conclusions: The findings suggest that OA recruit additional neural resources to achieve similar behavioural performance during low-level cognitive interference, but that compensation in OA may be insufficient to support behavioural performance at higher levels of interference.