Stromal coexpression of uPA/PAI-1 protein predicts poor disease outcome in endocrine-treated postmenopausal patients with receptor-positive early breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate whether uPA/PAI-1 protein in hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast tumor can predict prognosis in early breast cancer (BC). METHODS: 606 women with HR + BC who had ≥5 years of endocrine therapy and in whom tumor tissue was available were included in this analysis. Stromal uPA/PAI-1 protein expression was evaluated by immunohistochemistry and correlated with distant recurrence-free survival (DRFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Stromal uPA was detected in 292/538 tumors (54.3%) while 269/505 samples (53.3%) exhibited stromal PAI-1. Co-expression of both proteins was found in 163/437 (37.3%) samples. Stromal uPA/PAI-1 co-expression was not associated with tumor size, age, nodal status, grading, or receptor status. Tumor stroma with both uPA and PAI-1 protein expression were more likely to have a shorter DRFS (HR: 1.87; 95%CI 1.18-2.96; p = 0.007) and OS (HR: 1.29; 95%CI 0.93-1.80; p = 0.129) than women without uPA/PAI-1 co-expression. After a median follow-up of 10 years, women with uPA/PAI-1-positive tumors experienced a significantly shorter DRFS (86.5% vs 72.4%; p < 0.001) and OS (70.4% vs 58.9%; p = 0.020) compared to women with uPA/PAI-1 negative tumors. CONCLUSION: Stromal co-expression of uPA and PAI-1 in breast cancer predicts poor DRFS and OS in postmenopausal women with HR + early-stage BC who receive endocrine therapy.

Zoledronic acid combined with adjuvant endocrine therapy of tamoxifen versus anastrozol plus ovarian function suppression in premenopausal early breast cancer: final analysis of the Austrian Breast and Colorectal Cancer Study Group Trial 12.

BACKGROUND: Zoledronic acid (ZOL) plus adjuvant endocrine therapy significantly improved disease-free survival (DFS) at 48- and 62-month follow-up in the ABCSG-12 trial. We present efficacy results of a final additional analysis after 94.4 months. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were premenopausal women who had undergone primary surgery for stage I/II estrogen-receptor-positive and/or progesterone-receptor-positive breast cancer with <10 positive lymph nodes, and were scheduled for standard goserelin therapy. All 1803 patients received goserelin (3.6 mg every 28 days) and were randomized to tamoxifen (20 mg/days) or anastrozole (1 mg/days), both with or without ZOL (4 mg every 6 months) for 3 years. The primary end point was DFS; recurrence-free survival and overall survival (OS) were secondary end points. RESULTS: After 94.4-month median follow-up (range, 0-114 months), relative risks of disease progression [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.77; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.60-0.99; P = 0.042] and of death (HR = 0.66; 95% CI 0.43-1.02; P = 0.064) are still reduced by ZOL although no longer significant at the predefined significance level. Overall, 251 DFS events and 86 deaths were reported. Absolute risk reductions with ZOL were 3.4% for DFS and 2.2% for OS. There was no DFS difference between tamoxifen alone versus anastrozole alone, but there was a pronounced higher risk of death for anastrozole-treated patients (HR = 1.63; 95% CI 1.05-1.45; P = 0.030). Treatments were generally well tolerated, with no reports of renal failure or osteonecrosis of the jaw. CONCLUSION: These final results from ABCSG 12 suggest that twice-yearly ZOL enhances the efficacy of adjuvant endocrine treatment, and this benefit is maintained long-term. CLINICALTRIALSGOV: NCT00295646 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/results?term=00295646).

Predicting distant recurrence in receptor-positive breast cancer patients with limited clinicopathological risk: using the PAM50 Risk of Recurrence score in 1478 postmenopausal patients of the ABCSG-8 trial treated with adjuvant endocrine therapy alone.

BACKGROUND: PAM50 is a 50-gene test that is designed to identify intrinsic breast cancer subtypes and generate a Risk of Recurrence (ROR) score. It has been developed to be carried out in qualified routine hospital pathology laboratories. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One thousand four hundred seventy-eight postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor (ER)+ early breast cancer (EBC) treated with tamoxifen or tamoxifen followed by anastrozole from the prospective randomized ABCSG-8 trial were entered into this study. Patients did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy. RNA was extracted from paraffin blocks and analyzed using the PAM50 test. Both intrinsic subtype (luminal A/B, HER2-enriched, basal-like) and ROR score were calculated. The primary analysis was designed to test whether the continuous ROR score adds prognostic value in predicting distant recurrence (DR) over and above standard clinical variables. RESULTS: In all tested subgroups, ROR score significantly adds prognostic information to the clinical predictor (P<0.0001). PAM50 assigns an intrinsic subtype to all cases, and the luminal A cohort had a significantly lower ROR at 10 years compared with Luminal B (P<0.0001). Significant and clinically relevant discrimination between low- and high-risk groups occurred also within all tested subgroups. CONCLUSION(S): The results of the primary analysis, in combination with recently published results from the ATAC trial, constitute Level 1 evidence for clinical validity of the PAM50 test for predicting the risk of DR in postmenopausal women with ER+ EBC. A 10-year metastasis risk of <3.5% in the ROR low category makes it unlikely that additional chemotherapy would improve this outcome-this finding could help to avoid unwarranted overtreatment. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: ABCSG 8: NCT00291759.

The predictive impact of body mass index on the efficacy of extended adjuvant endocrine treatment with anastrozole in postmenopausal patients with breast cancer: an analysis of the randomised ABCSG-6a trial.

BACKGROUND: We investigated whether body mass index (BMI) can be used as a predictive parameter indicating patients who benefit from extended aromatase inhibitor (AI) treatment. METHODS: The ABCSG-6a trial re-randomised event-free postmenopausal hormone receptor-positive patients from the ABCSG-6 trial to receive either 3 additional years of endocrine therapy using anastrozole vs nil. In this retrospective analysis, we investigated the prognostic and predictive impact of BMI on disease outcome and safety. RESULTS: In all, 634 patients (177 normal weight, 307 overweight, and 150 obese) patients were included in this analysis. Normal weight patients with additional 3 years of anastrozole halved their risk of disease recurrence (disease-free survival (DFS) HR 0.48; P=0.02) and death (HR 0.45; P=0.06) and had only a fifth of the risk of distant metastases (HR 0.22; P=0.05) compared with normal weight patients without any further treatment. In contrast, overweight+obese patients derived no benefit from additional 3 years of anastrozole (DFS HR 0.93; P=0.68; distant recurrence-free survival HR 0.91; P=0.78; and OS HR 0.9; P=0.68). The possible predictive impact of BMI on extended endocrine treatment could be strengthened by a Cox regression interaction model between BMI and treatment (P=0.07). CONCLUSION: Body mass index may be used to predict outcome benefit of extended AI treatment in patients with receptor-positive breast cancer.

Efficacy of tamoxifen ± aminoglutethimide in normal weight and overweight postmenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer: an analysis of 1509 patients of the ABCSG-06 trial.

BACKGROUND: There exists evidence that body mass index (BMI) impacts on the efficacy of aromatase inhibitors in patients with breast cancer. The relationship between BMI and the efficacy of tamoxifen is conflicting. We investigated the impact of BMI on the efficacy of single tamoxifen and tamoxifen plus an aromatase inhibitor in the well-defined prospective study population of the ABCSG-06 trial. METHODS: ABCSG-06 investigated the efficacy of tamoxifen vs tamoxifen plus aminoglutethimide in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. Taking BMI at baseline, patients were classified as normal weight (BMI=18.5-24.9 kg m(-)(2)), overweight (BMI=25-29.9 kg m(-)(2)), and obese (30 kg m(-)(2)) according to WHO criteria. RESULTS: Overweight+obese patients had an increased risk for distant recurrences (hazard ratio (HR): 1.51; Cox P=0·018) and a worse overall survival (OS; HR: 1·49; Cox P=0·052) compared with normal weight patients. Analysing patients treated with single tamoxifen only, no difference between overweight+obese patients and normal weight patients regarding distant recurrence-free survival (HR: 1.35; Cox P=0·24) and OS (HR: 0.99; Cox P=0·97) could be observed. In contrast, in the group of patients treated with the combination of tamoxifen plus aminoglutethimide, overweight+obese patients had an increased risk for distant recurrences (1.67; Cox P=0·03) and a worse OS (1.47; Cox P=0·11) compared with normal weight patients. CONCLUSION: BMI impacts on the efficacy of aromatase inhibitor-based treatment but not single tamoxifen.

Irinotecan plus raltitrexed vs raltitrexed alone in patients with gemcitabine-pretreated advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

There is no established second-line treatment for advanced pancreatic cancer after gemcitabine failure. In view of the urgent need for such therapy, and since preclinical and phase I clinical data suggest an encouraging, potentially synergistic activity between raltitrexed and irinotecan, the present randomised phase II study was initiated. A total of 38 patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma, who progressed while receiving or within 6 months after discontinuation of palliative first-line chemotherapy with gemcitabine, were enrolled in this study. They were randomised to 3-weekly courses of raltitrexed 3 mg x m(-2) on day 1 (arm A) or irinotecan 200 mg x m(-2) on day 1 plus raltitrexed 3 mg x m(-2) on day 2 (arm B). The primary study end point was objective response, secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), as well as clinical benefit response in symptomatic patients (n=28). In the combination arm, the IRC-confirmed objective response rate was 16% (three out of 19 patients had a partial remission; 95% CI, 3-40%), which was clearly superior to that in the comparator/control arm with raltitrexed alone, in which no response was obtained. Therefore, the trial was already stopped at the first stage of accrual. Also, the secondary study end points, median PFS (2.5 vs 4.0 months), OS (4.3 vs 6.5 months), and clinical benefit response (8 vs 29%) were superior in the combination arm. The objective and subjective benefits of raltitrexed+irinotecan were not negated by severe, clinically relevant treatment-related toxicities: gastrointestinal symptoms (42 vs 68%), partial alopecia (0 vs 42%), and cholinergic syndrome (0 vs 21%) were more commonly noted in arm B; however, grade 3 adverse events occurred in only three patients in both treatment groups. Our data indicate that combined raltitrexed+irinotecan seems to be an effective salvage regimen in patients with gemcitabine-pretreated pancreatic cancer. The superior response activity, PFS and OS (when compared to raltitrexed), as well as its tolerability and ease of administration suggest that future trials with this combination are warranted.

Biweekly high-dose gemcitabine alone or in combination with capecitabine in patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a randomized phase II trial.

BACKGROUND: Gemcitabine is an active antitumor agent in the treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer, and has shown potential synergistic activity with the oral fluoropyrimidine capecitabine in previous phase I/II trials. Based on this background and in order to define the therapeutic potential and tolerance of this combination more precisely, the present randomized multicenter phase II trial was initiated. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We prospectively randomized 83 patients to treatment with biweekly gemcitabine 2,200 mg/m(2) given as a 30 min intravenous infusion on day 1, or the same treatment plus oral capecitabine 2,500 mg/m(2) given from days 1 to 7. In both arms, chemotherapy was administered for a duration of 6 months unless there was prior evidence of progressive disease. The efficacy of the two treatment arms was evaluated according to standard criteria, i.e. objective response, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), as well as by analysis of clinical benefit response. RESULTS: The overall objective response rate among the 42 patients treated with gemcitabine alone was 14% compared with 7/41 (17%) among those treated with the combination arm. Similar to response rates, there was no apparent difference between the two groups in terms of median PFS (4.0 versus 5.1 months) and median OS (8.2 versus 9.5 months) in the gemcitabine and combination arm, respectively. Of 61 patients with tumor-related symptoms, who were considered evaluable for clinical benefit response, 10/30 (33%) and 15/31 (48.4%) experienced significant palliation in the gemcitabine and combination arm, respectively. Chemotherapy was well tolerated in both arms with only four versus six patients experiencing WHO grade 3 symptoms. Apart from the occurrence of hand-foot syndrome in 10 patients, no major increase in incidence and/or degree of adverse reactions was noted in the combination arm. CONCLUSIONS: Results of this trial suggest a fairly good therapeutic index for the combination of biweekly high-dose gemcitabine and capecitabine for the treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer. Despite a somewhat superior clinical benefit response rate, no advantage over single-agent gemcitabine, however, was noted in terms of objective efficacy parameters.

[Early experience with the advanced breast biopsy instrumentation system in a multicentre study]. / Zwischenbericht über die Anwendung des 'Advanced Breast Biopsy Instrumentation'- Systems im Rahmen einer Multizenterstudie.

Early Experience with the Advanced Breast Biopsy Instrumentation System in a Multicentre Study In an Austrian multicentre trial between September 1998 and December 2001, 474 procedures were performed with the Advanced Breast Biopsy Instrumentation (ABBI), and 389 were entered in the protocol. For reasons of patient comfort, radiological accuracy and low complication rate, the stereotactic excision biopsy with the ABBI system is a useful alternative to 'open' biopsy of non-palpable breast lesions, although there are technical limitations. The question of the therapeutic option in breast cancer cannot be answered yet.

Prognostic relevance of three histological grading methods in breast cancer.

Histological grading is an important parameter for the risk assessment in patients with breast cancer. However, up to now differing grading methods are used which have not been compared with respect to their prognostic significance. In the present study the prognostic significance of three different methods of histological grading (Elston, Contesso, Helpap) was determined in a sample of 292 patients. Furthermore, results obtained in needle biopsies were compared with those obtained in surgical resection specimens in 31 cases. The mitotic counts and the Contesso method were performed on two microscopes with different field areas (0.238 mm2 and 0.345 mm2). Univariate and multivariate analysis revealed that all three histological grading methods had a high prognostic value concerning overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Using univariate and multivariate analysis the Elston method performed best to determine OS and DFS (p<0.0001 and p<0.001). The field area of the microscope had a minor influence on the mitotic count and on the results of the Contesso method. The histological grading was reliable in needle biopsies: the best agreement to grading obtained in the definitive surgical specimen was achieved with the Elston method (kappa statistic 0.727). As a conclusion, we could show that determination of the histological grade is an important prognostic factor in breast cancer with the Elston method giving the best results. Also, we could demonstrate that histological grading in needle biopsies is reliable enough to allow a preoperative risk estimation.

Evaluation of the United States Food and Drug Administration-approved scoring and test system of HER-2 protein expression in breast cancer.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the prognostic significance of assessment of human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER)-2 oncogene protein overexpression of breast cancer tissue by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved HercepTest and grading system (negative, 0 or 1+; weakly positive, 2+; strongly positive, 3+). Furthermore, results of the HercepTest were correlated with immunohistochemical results obtained using different antibodies and protocols and with HER-2 oncogene gene amplification assessed by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: HER-2 status in 303 patients with lymph node-positive breast cancer was investigated by using a rabbit polyclonal antibody (DAKO) by conventional immunohistochemistry and by applying the HercepTest. Furthermore, the monoclonal antibody CB-11 was used in conventional immunohistochemistry and with the NexES automatic stainer, which is also under consideration for FDA approval for determination of eligibility for Herceptin therapy. Results were compared with FISH analysis performed in all 2+ and 3+ specimens (103 cases) and 104 HER-2-negative specimens. RESULTS: 3+ positive carcinomas were found in 8.9-15.7% of specimens. FISH revealed that almost exclusively 3+ positive cases were amplified, with the HercepTest and the NexES automatic stainer giving the best results. In univariate analysis, staining with the HercepTest revealed a significantly worse prognosis in 3+ cases. Also, 3+ cases were significantly associated with lower estrogen receptor levels and histological grade III tumors. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that the results of the FDA-approved HER-2 grading and test system correlated strongly with findings in FISH. Furthermore, HercepTest proved to be of prognostic relevance. Strict adherence to the given protocols is critical.

Oxaliplatin plus raltitrexed in patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma: results of a Phase I-II trial.

BACKGROUND: Oxaliplatin and raltitrexed both are active anticancer agents in the treatment of patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma: They have different mechanisms of action and toxicity profiles and have shown at least additive effects in experimental and preliminary clinical studies. The aim of this disease oriented Phase I-II study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), the dose-limiting toxicities (DLT), and the objective response rate of this combination in patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma. METHODS: Between April 1998 and March 1999, 69 patients with measurable metastatic colorectal carcinoma who previously were unexposed to palliative chemotherapy were enrolled. In the Phase I part of the study, 27 patients were treated with 3-weekly courses of a fixed dose of raltitrexed (3 mg/m(2) given as a 15-minute intravenous infusion) followed by a 2-hour infusion of oxaliplatin, which was escalated in consecutive cohorts of three to six patients from 85 mg/m(2) to 100 mg/m(2), 120 mg/m(2), 130 mg/m(2), and 140 mg/m(2). After having defined the toxic dose, 42 additional patients were entered at one dose level below to define the therapeutic index of this combination more precisely. RESULTS: In the Phase I part of the study, during the first three dose levels, only one patient each experienced DLT (Grade 3 increase in transaminases, diarrhea, and stomatitis); at level 4, two of the first six patients entered had Grade 3 neutropenic infection or peripheral neurotoxicity, whereas dose level 5 (oxaliplatin 140 mg/m(2)) constituted the toxic dose with three of three patients experiencing DLT (Grade 3 asthenia, transient amaurosis, and diarrhea with Grade 4 neutropenia). Externally reviewed objective responses were noted in 9 of these 27 patients (33%), and stable disease occurred in 12 patients (44.4%). Among the 42 patients who were treated subsequently at the MTD level (Phase II portion), 20 patients (47.6%) responded (95% confidence interval, 32-62.6%), and 21 patients (50%) had stable disease. Their median progression free survival was 9.0 months, and the median overall survival, with 42 patients (67%) currently alive, is > 14.5 months. Treatment tolerance at the MTD was acceptable, with only 9 of 42 patients (21%) experiencing Grade 3-4 neutropenia; Grade 3 nonhematologic adverse reactions included increase in serum transaminases in 6 patients, peripheral neuropathy in 3 patients, diarrhea in 3 patients, and both stomatitis and emesis in only 1 patient each. CONCLUSIONS: The described objective response and toxicity data, which are in agreement with preliminary results of other Phase I-II studies, support the promising therapeutic potential of this combination in the treatment of patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma. Due to its substantial antitumor activity, tolerance (at the recommended MTD level), and convenient 3-weekly outpatient administration schedule, further evaluation of this regimen seems warranted.

Treatment of advanced breast cancer with vinorelbine and docetaxel with or without human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor.

PURPOSE: A multicenter phase II trial was performed to investigate the efficacy and tolerance of docetaxel, vinorelbine with or without recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) in patients with metastatic breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between February 1998 and March 1999, 57 patients participated in this trial. Forty-two patients received this combination as first-line and 15 patients as second-line chemotherapy, including 10 patients who had failed anthracyclines. Therapy consisted of vinorelbine 30 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 15 and docetaxel 30 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8, and 15 every 4 weeks. Depending on the absolute neutrophil counts on the day of scheduled chemotherapeutic drug administration, a 5-day course of G-CSF 5 microg/kg/d was given. RESULTS: The overall response rate was 64.3% (95% confidence interval, 48.1% to 78.4%) in patients receiving docetaxel plus vinorelbine as first-line chemotherapy, including eight complete (19%) and 19 partial remissions (45.3%); 11 patients (26.2%) had disease stabilization, and only four (9.5%) progressed. Second-line treatment with this regimen resulted in eight (53.3%) of 15 objective responses, four had stable disease, and three had progressive disease. The median time to progression was 12 months in the first-line and 9.8 months in the second-line setting, respectively. After a median follow-up time of 18 months, 38 patients (65%) were still alive with metastatic disease. Myelosuppression was commonly observed; World Health Organization grade 3 or 4 neutropenia both occurred in 18 patients (32%) and was complicated by septicemia in four cases; grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia was seen in two patients (4%), and grade 3 anemia was seen in only one patient (2%). Severe (grade 3) nonhematologic toxicity, except for alopecia, was rarely observed and included nausea/vomiting in two patients (4%), and stomatitis, peripheral neuropathy, and skin toxicity each in one patient. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that docetaxel and vinorelbine with or without G-CSF is an effective and fairly well tolerated regimen for the treatment of advanced breast cancer. It might be particularly useful in patients previously exposed to adjuvant or palliative anthracyclines and/or alkylating agents.

Treatment of advanced, refractory breast cancer with alternating docetaxel and epirubicin/cyclophosphamide plus human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor.

PURPOSE: A phase II study was performed to investigate the efficacy and tolerance of alternating docetaxel and epirubicin/cyclophosphamide plus recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) in patients with advanced breast cancer who failed previous non-anthracycline/taxane-containing palliative chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between November 96 and June 98, a total of 45 patients participated in this trial. Chemotherapy consisted of docetaxel 100 mg/m2 given as a 1-h infusion on day 1, and epirubicin 100 mg/m2 plus cyclophosphamide 800 mg/m2 both administered on day 21. G-CSF 5 microg/kg/day was given subcutaneously from days 22-28 during each cycle. Treatment courses were repeated every 42 days for a total of three courses unless prior evidence of progressive disease. RESULTS: The overall response rate was 57.8% (95% confidence interval, 42.1-72.3%), including seven complete (15.5%) and 19 partial remissions (42.3%); nine patients (20%) had stabilization of disease and 10 (22.3%) progressed. The median time to treatment failure was 7.0 months (range 1.5-26.0), and the median overall survival time 15.0 months (range 2.0-37.0+) with 12 patients (27%) currently still alive with metastatic disease. Myelosuppression was commonly observed with WHO grade 3/4 neutropenia in 20 patients (44%) complicated by septicemia in five (11%). Severe nonhematologic toxicity included stomatitis in five patients (11%), skin and peripheral neurotoxicity each in one patient; alopecia was seen in all 45 patients with complete hair loss in 26 (58%). CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that alternating docetaxel and epirubicin/cyclo-phosphamide plus G-CSF is an effective and tolerable second-line combination regimen for the treatment of advanced breast cancer.

A phase II trial of biweekly high dose gemcitabine for patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Although the novel cytidine analog gemcitabine has shown superior antitumor activity compared with weekly bolus 5-fluorouracil in patients with advanced pancreatic carcinoma, further improvements of therapeutic results are warranted. The current Phase II study was initiated to investigate whether this might be achieved by dose intensification. METHODS: Between August 1997 and September 1998, 43 consecutive patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma were enrolled in this multicenter Phase II trial. Patients received 4 weekly courses of gemcitabine 2200 mg/m((2)) given as intravenous infusion during 30 minutes on Days 1 and 15 for a duration of 6 months unless there was prior evidence of progressive disease. The efficacy of treatment was assessed according to standard criteria, i.e., objective response, progression free survival, and overall survival, as well as by analysis of clinical benefit response (defined as >/= 50% reduction in pain intensity, >/= 50% reduction in daily analgesic consumption, and/or >/= 20 point improvement in Karnofsky performance status that was sustained for >/= 4 consecutive weeks). RESULTS: Of 43 patients evaluable for objective response, 1 achieved complete and 8 partial remissions, for an overall response rate of 21% (95% confidence interval, 10-36%); 18 additional patients (42%) had stable and 16 (37%) progressive disease. The median time to progression was 5.3 months. Median survival was 8.8 months, and the probability of surviving beyond 12 months was 26.3%. Of 36 patients with tumor-related symptoms who were considered evaluable for clinical benefit response, 16 (44%) experienced significant palliation. The median time to achieve a clinical benefit response was 6 weeks, and its median duration was 27 weeks. Chemotherapy was well tolerated, with leukopenia/granulocytopenia representing the most common side effect. Gastrointestinal and other subjective toxicities were infrequent and generally mild. CONCLUSIONS: Biweekly high dose gemcitabine seems to represent a safe, tolerable, and effective regimen for the palliative treatment of patients with advanced pancreatic carcinoma.

Treatment of unresectable, locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma with combined radiochemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin and cisplatin.

The aim of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of a combined treatment modality including systemic chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil (FU), leucovorin, cisplatin and external beam radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Systemic chemotherapy consisted of FU 400 mg m(-2) and leucovorin 20 mg m(-2) both given as intravenous bolus injection on days 1-4, plus cisplatin 20 mg m(-2) administered as 90-min infusion on days 1-4. Treatment courses were repeated every 4 weeks x 6 unless prior evidence of progressive disease. Radiation therapy using megavolt irradiation of > or = 6 MV photons with a 3- or 4-field technique was delivered during the second and third chemotherapy course, that was reduced in dose by 25%. Between October 1994 and July 1996, a total of 38 patients were entered onto this trial, all of whom were assessable for toxicity and survival. Eighteen of these (47%) had objective remissions to combined radiochemotherapy, including four CR (11%), 13 (34%) had stable disease and seven patients (18%) showed tumour progression during treatment. The median progression-free interval of the entire study population was 10 months (range 3-32), and median overall survival was 14.0 months (range 3-45+ months); 53% of all patients were alive at 12 months, and 18% of patients were alive at 24 months respectively. Severe haematological side-effects comprised neutropenia in 18%, thrombocytopenia in 8% and anaemia in 11%. The most frequent non-haematological side-effects were nausea/vomiting (WHO grade 3: 18%), and diarrhoea (grade 3: 13%). This combined radiochemotherapy regimen was tolerable and effective in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Since therapeutic results, in fact, compare favourably with other series, including surgical treatment of potentially resectable tumours, further evaluation of combined treatment modalities in the neoadjuvant setting seems warranted.

Treatment of advanced breast cancer with gemcitabine and vinorelbine plus human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor.

PURPOSE: A phase II trial was performed to investigate the efficacy and tolerance of gemcitabine, vinorelbine, and recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) in advanced breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between April 96 and August 97, 60 patients entered this trial. Forty-five patients were previously untreated and 15 patients had failed previous palliative chemotherapy with (n = 10) or without anthracyclines (n = 5). Therapy consisted of gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 on days 1 + 15 + 21 and vinorelbine 40 mg/m2 on days 1 + 21, both diluted in 250 ml saline and infused over 30 min. G-CSF was administered at 5 microg/kg/day subcutaneously from days 2-6 and 22-26. Courses were repeated every 5 weeks. Treatment was continued in case of response or stable disease until a total of six courses. RESULTS: The overall response rate was 55.5% for patients who had not received prior palliative chemotherapy (95% confidence interval, 40%-70.3%), including 5 CR (11.1%) and 20 PR (44.4%); 12 patients (27%) had stable disease (SD), and 8 (18%) progressed. Second-line treatment with this regimen resulted in 6/15 (40%) objective remissions, 5 had SD, and 4 PD. The median time to progression was 9.5 months (range, 1.5-28) in previously untreated patients, and 7.0 months (range, 2-23) in those who had failed prior chemotherapy. After a median follow-up time of 15 months, 44 patients (73%) are still alive with metastatic disease. Myelosuppression was commonly observed, though WHO 3 and 4 neutropenia occured in only 9 (15%) and 2 patients (3%), and was never complicated by septicaemia; grade 3 anemia was noted in 2 patients. Severe (WHO grade 3) nonhematologic toxicity was rarely observed, and included nausea/emesis in 3 and constipation in 2 patients. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that gemcitabine and vinorelbine plus G-CSF is an effective and tolerable first- as well as second-line combination regimen for treatment of advanced breast cancer.

Combined irinotecan and oxaliplatin plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in patients with advanced fluoropyrimidine/leucovorin-pretreated colorectal cancer.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerance of combined irinotecan and oxaliplatin in patients with advanced colorectal cancer pretreated with leucovorin-modulated fluoropyrimidines. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-six patients with metastatic colorectal cancer, who progressed while receiving or within 6 months after discontinuing palliative chemotherapy with fluoropyrimidines/leucovorin, were enrolled onto this study. Treatment consisted of oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 on days 1 + 15 and irinotecan 80 mg/m2 on days 1 + 8 + 15 every 4 weeks. Depending on the absolute neutrophil counts (ANC) on the day of scheduled chemotherapeutic drug administration, a 5-day course of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) 5 microg/kg/d was given. RESULTS: The overall response rate was 42% for all 36 assessable patients (95% confidence interval, 26% to 59%), including two complete remissions (6%). Thirteen additional patients (36%) had stable disease, and only eight (22%) progressed. The median time to treatment failure was 7.5 months (range, 1 to 13.5+ months). After a median follow-up time of 14 months, 19 patients (53%) are still alive. Hematologic toxicity was commonly observed, although according to the ANC-adapted use of G-CSF (in 31 patients during 81 of 174 courses), it was generally mild: grade 3 and 4 granulocytopenia occurred in only five and two cases, respectively. The most frequent nonhematologic adverse reactions were nausea/emesis and diarrhea, which were rated severe in 17% and 19%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that the combination of irinotecan and oxaliplatin with or without G-CSF has substantial antitumor activity in patients with progressive fluoropyrimidine/leucovorin-pretreated colorectal cancer. Overall toxicity was modest, with gastrointestinal symptoms constituting the dose-limiting side effects. Further evaluation of this regimen seems warranted.

Effective treatment of advanced breast cancer with vinorelbine, 5-fluorouracil and l-leucovorin plus human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor.

A phase II trial was performed to investigate the efficacy and tolerance of vinorelbine (VNB), 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), l-leucovorin (LLV) and recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) in advanced breast cancer. Between August 1994 and October 1996, 53 patients entered this trial. Thirty-seven patients were previously untreated and 16 patients had failed previous palliative chemotherapy with (n = 12) or without anthracyclines (n = 4). Therapy consisted of VNB 40 mg m(-2) diluted in 250 ml of saline infused over 30 min on days 1 and 14 and LLV 100 mg m(-2) administered by intravenous bolus injection and 5-FU 400 mg m(-2) diluted in 500 ml of saline infused over 2 h, both given on days 1-5 every 4 weeks. G-CSF was administered at 5 microg kg(-1) day(-1) subcutaneously on days 6-10 during each cycle. Treatment was continued in cases of response or stable disease until a total of six courses were completed. The overall response rate was 59% for chemotherapeutically naive patients (95% confidence interval 42-75%), including five complete responses (CR; 13%) and 17 partial responses (PR; 46%); ten patients (27%) had stable disease (SD) and only five (14%) progressed (PD). Second-line chemotherapy with this regimen resulted in 3/16 (19%) objective remissions, but nine patients had SD and four had PD. The median time to progression was 10.5 months (range 2-23) in previously untreated patients and 7.0 months (range 2-19) in those who had failed prior chemotherapy. After a median follow-up time of 14 months, 29 patients (55%) are still alive with metastatic disease; median survival has not been reached yet. The dose-limiting toxicity was myelosuppression: WHO grade III and IV neutropenia occurred in 15 (28%) and four patients (8%), and was complicated by septicaemia in two; grade III anaemia and thrombocytopenia were noted in four (8%) and three (6%) patients respectively. Severe (WHO grade 3) non-haematological toxicities included stomatitis in 6% and nausea/vomiting and alopecia in 2% each. Our data suggest that the combination of vinorelbine, 5-fluorouracil and l-leucovorin plus G-CSF is an effective first line regimen for treatment of advanced breast cancer. Overall toxicity was modest, with myelosuppression being the dose-limiting side-effect. Other severe adverse reactions were uncommon.

Effective treatment of advanced breast cancer with vinorelbine, mitomycin C plus human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor.

A phase II trial was performed to evaluate the efficacy and tolerance of vinorelbine (VNB), mitomycin C (MMC), and recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) in advanced breast cancer. Between October 1992 and July 1994, 55 patients entered this trial. Nine patients had locally advanced disease and 46 had distant metastases, including 14 who had received previous palliative chemotherapy with (n = 9) or without anthracyclines (n = 5). Therapy consisted of VNB 40-50 mg m(-2) diluted in 250 ml saline infused over 30 min every 3 weeks, and MMC 15 mg m(-2) administered by intravenous bolus injection every 6 weeks. G-CSF was given at 5 microg kg(-1) day(-1) subcutaneously from days 2 to 7 following each cytotoxic drug administration. Treatment was continued in case of response or stable disease for a total of six courses. The overall response rate was 73% for all 55 patients (95% confidence interval, 59-84%), including 12 (22%) complete response (CR) and 28 (51%) partial response (PR); 13 patients (24%) had stable disease (SD), and only two (4%) progressed. All nine patients with locally advanced disease were rated responsive (two pCR, seven PR) and underwent surgery with curative intent. Eight out of nine remain disease free after a median observation period of 18 months (range, 13.5-28 months). Among the 32 previously untreated patients with metastatic disease, nine (28%) achieved CR, 15 PR (47%), seven SD (22%) and one PD (3%). Second-line chemotherapy with this regimen resulted in 7/14 (50%) objective remissions (one CR, six PR), six had SD and one PD. The median time to progression was 12 months (range, 2-24+ months) in previously untreated patients with disseminated disease, and 6.0 months (range, 2-22 months) in those who had failed prior chemotherapy. After a median follow-up time of 20 months, 24 patients with distant metastases are still alive with disease; median survival has not been reached yet. The dose-limiting toxicity was myelosuppression: six (11%) and ten patients (18%) had World Health Organization grade 3, and eight (14%) and nine patients (16%) had grade 4 leucopenia and granulocytopenia respectively. Severe (WHO grade 3) non-haematological toxicities included nausea/vomiting in 7%, constipation in 9%, peripheral neuropathy in 5%, infectious episodes in 7%, phlebitis due to drug extravasation in 5%, alopecia in 9%, and acute reversible pulmonary toxicity in 11%. Our data suggest that vinorelbine, mitomycin C plus G-CSF has an excellent anti-tumour activity in advanced breast cancer, probably superior to most other available combination chemotherapy regimens. This combination does not seem to present significant cross-resistance with previous CMF or anthracycline regimens. Apart from reversible, acute pulmonary toxicity, a rare adverse reaction that had previously been described for VNB, as well as the combination of natural vinca alkaloids with mitomycin C, and few episodes of grade 3 neurotoxicity (all of which occurred at the initial 50 mg m(-2) VNB dose level), the tolerance of this regimen seems acceptable and justifies further evaluation in front-line and salvage therapy of advanced breast cancer.

Combined intraperitoneal plus intravenous chemotherapy after curative resection for colonic adenocarcinoma.

Patients who underwent potential curative surgery for colonic adenocarcinoma were enrolled in a prospectively randomised, controlled clinical trial of combined intraperitoneal (i.p.) plus systemic intravenous (i.v.) chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (LV). We investigated whether this adjuvant treatment approach, specifically addressing the risk of peritoneal and hepatic recurrence, could improve disease-free and overall survival. Between May 1988 and December 1990, 121 patients with resected stage III or high-risk stage II (T4N0M0) colon cancer were randomly assigned for observation (which was considered standard care until the NIH consensus conference) or adjuvant chemotherapy with LV (200 mg/m2) plus 5-FU (350 mg/m2), both given i.v. (days 1-4) and i.p. (days 1 and 3) every 4 weeks for a total of six courses. After a median follow-up time of 4.6 years, a comparative analysis between the two groups of patients suggested both an improvement in disease-free survival (75% versus 58%; P = 0.06) and a survival advantage (78% versus 63%; P = 0.05) in favour of adjuvant chemotherapy. The sites of recurrence were also different, i.e. local regional and intrahepatic tumour recurrences were observed in only 6/58 (10%) and 5/58 (9%) adjuvant treated patients as compared to 11/60 (18%) and 10/60 (17%) observed patients. The overall benefit of adjuvant therapy appeared to be greatest in patients with stage III colon cancer. Treatment-associated toxicity was infrequent and generally mild with only 5% experiencing severe (WHO grade 3) adverse reactions. Interim results of this adjuvant trial suggest that combined i.p. plus systemic i.v. chemotherapy with 5-FU and LV represents a potentially effective adjuvant regimen in stage II/III colon cancer.