Implementing Motor Unit Number Index (MUNIX) in a large clinical trial: Real world experience from 27 centres.

OBJECTIVE: Motor Unit Number Index (MUNIX) is a quantitative neurophysiological method that reflects loss of motor neurons in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) in longitudinal studies. It has been utilized in one natural history ALS study and one drug trial (Biogen USA) after training and qualification of raters. METHODS: Prior to testing patients, evaluators had to submit test-retest data of 4 healthy volunteers. Twenty-seven centres with 36 raters measured MUNIX in 4 sets of 6 different muscles twice. Coefficient of variation of all measurements had to be <20% to pass the qualification process. MUNIX COV of the first attempt, number of repeated measurements and muscle specific COV were evaluated. RESULTS: COV varied considerably between raters. Mean COV of all raters at the first measurements was 12.9% ±â€¯13.5 (median 8.7%). Need of repetitions ranged from 0 to 43 (mean 10.7 ±â€¯9.1, median 8). Biceps and first dorsal interosseus muscles showed highest repetition rates. MUNIX variability correlated considerably with variability of compound muscle action potential. CONCLUSION: MUNIX revealed generally good reliability, but was rater dependent and ongoing support for raters was needed. SIGNIFICANCE: MUNIX can be implemented in large clinical trials as an outcome measure after training and a qualification process.

Sensory recovery after hand reimplantation: a clinical, morphological, and neurophysiological study in humans.

Despite fairly good return of motor function, patients who have amputated hands reimplanted demonstrate poor sensory recovery and severe cold intolerance, two variables that are difficult to quantify reliably. In this study we wanted to find out if there is a correlation between morphological findings of sensory and sympathetic reinnervation and clinical and neurophysiological variables. Skin was biopsied from the reimplanted and corresponding area in the normal hands of eight patients who had sustained a hand amputation and subsequent reimplantation. The sections were immunostained using markers for both sensory and sympathetic nerve fibres. Comparison between the reimplanted and normal sides in each individual showed a mean loss of sensory immunoreactive nerve fibres of 30%, and for sympathetic immunoreactivity the loss was 60%. There was measurable two-point discrimination in the injured hand only in patients below the age of 40 years, corresponding to the better recovery of mechanical thresholds evaluated neurophysiologically for this age group. These results confirm the extensive loss of sensory nerve fibres after nerve injury, probably correlated to loss of sensory neurons. We have also shown that it is possible to correlate the results of clinical and neurophysiological evaluation with morphological results of skin reinnervation specific to the repaired nerve, and so improve the possibility for the quantification of sensory recovery.

Somatosensory evoked potentials following stimulation of digital nerves.

Cortical and spinal somatosensory evoked potentials (SEP) were recorded in healthy individuals following stimulation of digits I, III, and V with an intensity below discomfort level. Peak latency of the earliest cortical negativity (N1) was found to be the most consistent and easily measured parameter, whereas a spinal potential (Cv) was not elicited in all subjects. Descriptive statistics, Student's paired t-test as well as simple and multiple regression, were used for computer analysis of N1 and Cv peak latencies and central conduction time. The results show a strong correlation between the peak latencies of spinal and cortical potentials and height and arm length of the subjects, with a mild but significant correlation with age. Using multiple regression for N1 and Cv latencies significantly improved the standard deviation. The data may provide reference values for neurophysiological evaluation of patients with cervical spine disorders.