Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
J Patient Saf ; 17(5): 398-404, 2021 08 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28671911

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Burnout is a threat to patient safety. It relates to emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and lack of personal accomplishment. Work engagement conversely composed of levels of vigor, dedication, and absorption in one's profession. The aim of this study was to examine burnout and work engagement among US dentists. METHODS: This study used the extensively validated Maslach Burnout Inventory-Human Services Survey and Utrecht Work Engagement Scale to measure burnout in a self-administered survey of 167 US dentists who attended continuing education courses held in Boston, Pittsburg, Iowa City, and Las Vegas. The mean scores on the 3 subscales of Maslach Burnout Inventory-Human Services Survey and Utrecht Work Engagement Scale were computed. The interscale correlations between the components of burnout and work engagement were assessed using Pearson correlations. We used 1-way analysis of variance and independent 2 sample t tests to examine the relationship between burnout and work engagement across sex and various age categories. Prevalence of burnout in our study population was also computed. RESULTS: We observed that 13.2% of our study population experienced burnout and 16.2% of our study population was highly work engaged. There was a statistically significant, unadjusted association between burnout risk and work engagement (χ2 = 22.51, P < 0.0001). Furthermore, the scores in the subscales of burnout were significantly correlated with scores in the subscales of work engagement. CONCLUSIONS: In this preliminary study, we observed some evidence of burnout among practicing US dentists. It is imperative that the dental profession understands this and works to promote professional practices that increase work engagement and decrease burnout.


Subject(s)
Burnout, Professional , Work Engagement , Burnout, Professional/epidemiology , Dentists , Emotions , Humans , Surveys and Questionnaires
2.
Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes ; 7(3): 280-286, 2021 05 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32170930

ABSTRACT

AIMS: Patients with heart failure (HF) have high costs, morbidity, and mortality, but it is not known if appropriate pharmacotherapy (AP), defined as compliance with international evidence-based guidelines, is associated with improved costs and outcomes. The purpose of this study was to evaluate HF patients' health care utilization, cost and outcomes in Region Halland (RH), Sweden, and if AP was associated with lower costs. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 5987 residents of RH in 2016 carried HF diagnoses. Costs were assigned to all health care utilization (inpatient, outpatient, emergency department, primary health care, and medications) using a Patient Encounter Costing methodology. Care of HF patients cost €58.6 M, (€9790/patient) representing 8.7% of RH's total visit expenses and 14.9% of inpatient care (IPC) expenses. Inpatient care represented 57.2% of this expenditure, totalling €33.5 M (€5601/patient). Receiving AP was associated with significantly lower costs, by €1130 per patient (P < 0.001, 95% confidence interval 574-1687). Comorbidities such as renal failure, diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and cancer were significantly associated with higher costs. CONCLUSION: Heart failure patients are heavy users of health care, particularly IPC. Receiving AP is associated with lower costs even adjusting for comorbidities, although causality cannot be proven from an observational study. There may be an opportunity to decrease overall costs and improve outcomes by improving prescribing patterns and associated high-quality care.


Subject(s)
Heart Failure , Emergency Service, Hospital , Health Expenditures , Heart Failure/epidemiology , Heart Failure/therapy , Hospitalization , Humans , Sweden/epidemiology
4.
Med Care ; 55(5): 483-492, 2017 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28169976

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Patient-centered medical home (PCMH) has gained prominence as a promising model to encourage improved primary care delivery. There is a paucity of studies that evaluate the impact of payment models in the PCMH. OBJECTIVES: We sought to examine whether coupling coordinated, team-based care transformation plan with a novel reimbursement model affects outcomes related to expenditures and utilization. RESEARCH DESIGN: Interrupted time-series model with a difference-in-differences approach to assess differences between intervention and control groups, across time periods attributable to PCMH transformation and/or payment change. RESULTS: Although results were modest and mixed overall, PCMH with payment reform is associated with a reduction of $1.04 (P=0.0347) per member per month (PMPM) in pharmacy expenditures. Patients with hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes, and coronary atherosclerosis enrolled in PCMH without payment reform experienced reductions in emergency department visits of 2.16 (P<0.0001), 2.42 (P<0.0001), 3.98 (P<0.0001), and 3.61 (P<0.0001) per 1000 per month. Modest increases in inpatient admission were seen among these patients in PCMH either with or without payment reform. Patients 65 and older enrolled in PMCH without payment reform experienced reductions in pharmacy expenditures $2.35 (P=0.0077) PMPM with a parallel reduction in pharmacy standardized cost of $2.81 (P=0.0174) PMPM indicative of a reduction in the intensity of drug utilization. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that PCMH implementation coupled with an innovative payment arrangement generated mixed results with modest improvements with respect to pharmacy expenditures, but no overall financial improvement. However, we did see improvement within specific groups, especially older patients and those with chronic conditions.


Subject(s)
Chronic Disease/economics , Fee-for-Service Plans/economics , Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data , Patient-Centered Care/economics , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Quality Assurance, Health Care/economics , Reimbursement, Incentive
5.
Am J Prev Med ; 51(4): 502-6, 2016 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27539974

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The epidemiology of American Heart Association ideal cardiovascular health (CVH) metrics has not been fully examined in African Americans. This study examines the associations of CVH metrics with incident cardiovascular disease (CVD) in the Jackson Heart Study, a longitudinal cohort study of CVD in African Americans. METHODS: Jackson Heart Study participants without CVD (n=4,702) were followed prospectively between 2000 and 2011. Incidence rates and Cox proportional hazard ratios estimated risks for incident CVD (myocardial infarction, stroke, cardiac procedures, and CVD mortality) associated with seven CVH metrics by sex. Analyses were performed in 2015. RESULTS: Participants were followed for a median of 8.3 years; none had ideal health on all seven CVH metrics. The prevalence of ideal health was low for nutrition, physical activity, BMI, and blood pressure metrics. The age-adjusted CVD incidence rate (IR) per 1,000 person years was highest for individuals with the least ideal health metrics: zero to one (IR=12.5, 95% CI=9.7, 16.1), two (IR=8.2, 95% CI=6.5, 10.4), three (IR=5.7, 95% CI=4.2, 7.6), and four or more (IR=3.4, 95% CI=2.0, 5.9). Adjusting for covariates, individuals with four or more ideal CVH metrics had lower risks of incident CVD compared with those with zero or one ideal CVH metric (hazard ratio, 0.29; 95% CI=0.17, 0.52; p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: African Americans with more ideal CVH metrics have lower risks of incident CVD. Comprehensive preventive behavioral and clinical supports should be intensified to improve CVD risk for African Americans with few ideal CVH metrics.


Subject(s)
Cardiovascular Diseases/epidemiology , Adult , Aged , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , Mississippi/epidemiology
6.
J Am Dent Assoc ; 147(10): 803-11, 2016 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27269376

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Although some patients experience adverse events (AEs) resulting in harm caused by treatments in dentistry, few published reports have detailed how dental providers describe these events. Understanding how dental treatment professionals view AEs is essential to building a safer environment in dental practice. METHODS: The authors interviewed dental professionals and domain experts through focus groups and in-depth interviews and asked them to identify the types of AEs that may occur in dental settings. RESULTS: The initial interview and focus group findings yielded 1,514 items that included both causes and AEs. In total, 632 causes were coded into 1 of the 8 categories of the Eindhoven classification, and 882 AEs were coded into 12 categories of a newly developed dental AE classification. Interrater reliability was moderate among coders. The list was reanalyzed, and duplicate items were removed leaving a total of 747 unique AEs and 540 causes. The most frequently identified AE types were "aspiration and ingestion" at 14% (n = 142), "wrong-site, wrong-procedure, wrong-patient errors" at 13%, "hard-tissue damage" at 13%, and "soft-tissue damage" at 12%. CONCLUSIONS: Dental providers identified a large and diverse list of AEs. These events ranged from "death due to cardiac arrest" to "jaw fatigue from lengthy procedures." PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: Identifying threats to patient safety is a key element of improving dental patient safety. An inventory of dental AEs underpins efforts to track, prevent, and mitigate these events.


Subject(s)
Dental Care/adverse effects , Dental Staff , Dentists , Medical Errors , Dental Care/psychology , Dental Staff/psychology , Dentists/psychology , Focus Groups , Humans , Interviews as Topic , Medical Errors/psychology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...