Mutations in STARD8 (DLC3) May Cause 46,XY Gonadal Dysgenesis.

INTRODUCTION: 46,XY gonadal dysgenesis is a condition that is characterised by undeveloped testes in individuals with a male karyotype. Mutations in many genes that underlie this condition have been identified; however, there are still a considerable number of patients with an unknown genetic background. Recently, a mutation in the STARD8 X-linked gene in two sisters with 46,XY gonadal dysgenesis has been reported. It was localised within the START domain, whose homologue in Drosophila is responsible for maintaining testes integrity during their development. METHODS: We analysed the potential pathogenicity of another STARD8 mutation, p.R887C, that was identified in a patient with 46,XY asymmetric gonadal dysgenesis. For this purpose, molecular dynamics simulations were performed. RESULTS: These simulations revealed the full rearrangement of the helix containing the p.R887C substitution upstream from the START domain, which may cause STARD8 protein dysfunction and contribute to 46,XY gonadal dysgenesis. A comparison of the phenotypes of the three described 46,XY gonadal dysgenesis patients that harbour STARD8 mutations indicated that alterations of this gene can result in a partial or complete gonadal dysgenesis phenotype. CONCLUSION: Based on these and previous results, it is reasonable to include STARD8 in gene panels for 46,XY gonadal dysgenesis.

Distinct Roles of NANOS1 and NANOS3 in the Cell Cycle and NANOS3-PUM1-FOXM1 Axis to Control G2/M Phase in a Human Primordial Germ Cell Model.

Nanos RNA-binding proteins are critical factors of germline development throughout the animal kingdom and their dysfunction causes infertility. During evolution, mammalian Nanos paralogues adopted divergent roles in germ cell biology. However, the molecular basis behind this divergence, such as their target mRNAs, remains poorly understood. Our RNA-sequencing analysis in a human primordial germ cell model-TCam-2 cell line revealed distinct pools of genes involved in the cell cycle process downregulated upon NANOS1 and NANOS3 overexpression. We show that NANOS1 and NANOS3 proteins influence different stages of the cell cycle. Namely, NANOS1 is involved in the G1/S and NANOS3 in the G2/M phase transition. Many of their cell cycle targets are known infertility and cancer-germ cell genes. Moreover, NANOS3 in complex with RNA-binding protein PUM1 causes 3'UTR-mediated repression of FOXM1 mRNA encoding a transcription factor crucial for G2/M phase transition. Interestingly, while NANOS3 and PUM1 act as post-transcriptional repressors of FOXM1, FOXM1 potentially acts as a transcriptional activator of NANOS3, PUM1, and itself. Finally, by utilizing publicly available RNA-sequencing datasets, we show that the balance between FOXM1-NANOS3 and FOXM1-PUM1 expression levels is disrupted in testis cancer, suggesting a potential role in this disease.

Noradrenergic signaling in the VTA modulates cocaine craving.

Exposure to drug-associated cues evokes drug-seeking behavior and is regarded as a major cause of relapse. Conditional stimulus upregulates noradrenaline (NA) system activity, but the drug-seeking behavior depends particularly on phasic dopamine signaling downstream from the ventral tegmental area (VTA). The VTA dopamine-ergic activity is regulated via the signaling of alpha1 -adrenergic and alpha2 -adrenergic receptors (α1 -ARs and α2 -ARs); thus, the impact of the conditional stimulus on drug-seeking behavior might involve NAergic signaling in the VTA. To date, the role of VTA ARs in regulating cocaine seeking was not studied. We found that cocaine seeking under extinction conditions in male Sprague-Dawley rats was attenuated by intra-VTA prazosin or terazosin-two selective α1 -AR antagonists. In contrast, cocaine seeking was facilitated by intra-VTA administration of the selective α1 -AR agonist phenylephrine as well as α2 -AR antagonist RX 821002, whereas the selective ß-AR antagonist propranolol had no effects. In addition, blockade of α1 -AR in the VTA prevented α2 -AR antagonist-induced enhancement of cocaine seeking. Importantly, the potential non-specific effects of the VTA AR blockade on cocaine seeking could be excluded, because none of the AR antagonists influenced sucrose seeking under extinction conditions or locomotor activity in the open field test. These results demonstrate that NAergic signaling potently and selectively regulates cocaine seeking during early cocaine withdrawal via VTA α1 -AR and α2 -AR but not ß-AR. Our findings provide new insight into the NAergic mechanisms that underlie cocaine craving.