Analysis of direct medical care costs of peptic ulcer disease in a Korean tertiary medical center.

OBJECTIVES: There have been no reported data on the medical care cost of idiopathic peptic ulcer disease (PUD) compared with H. pylori (+) and/or NSAID (+) cases although H. pylori-negative idiopathic ulcers are increasing. The aim of this study was to investigate the direct medical care costs of PUD based on whether it was H. pylori infection/from NSAIDs or idiopathic. MATERIAL AND METHODS: One hundred and seventy three patients with PUD comprising H. pylori and/or NSAID use-associated PUD (n = 145) and idiopathic PUD (n = 28) were prospectively enrolled in this study. The direct medical care costs were analyzed retrospectively for the patients with PUD during a one-year follow-up period. RESULTS: The recurrence rate within one year was significantly higher in idiopathic PUD than H. pylori and/or NSAID-associated PUD (p = 0.002). Direct medical care costs of idiopathic PUD ($2483.8) were higher than in patients with H. pylori and/or NSAID-associated PUD ($1751.8) resulting from longer duration of medication and higher proportion of endoscopic hemostasis and hospitalization. CONCLUSIONS: More clinical research is needed to improve outcome and reduce recurrence rate and medical care costs of idiopathic PUD.

Full costs of dispensing and administering fluorouracil chemotherapy for outpatients: A microcosting study.

BACKGROUND: Although full costs (including direct and indirect costs) that incurred during the process of chemotherapy administration should be measured, many studies estimate only direct labor and medication costs associated with various chemotherapy delivery systems. OBJECTIVES: To estimate the total costs for dispensing and administration of fluorouracil when administered with leucovorin, by intravenous infusion or bolus, using a microcosting approach from the perspective of a provider or health system. METHODS: A time-and-motion study was used to measure the time spent by (1) pharmacy staff in the handling, admixture, and dispensing of fluorouracil and (2) patients in the clinic. The study was performed at The Cancer Institute of New Jersey for an 8-month period. Costs of dispensing and administering fluorouracil were calculated per patient visit on the basis of resources used in the processing of fluorouracil and time spent by pharmacy staff and patient. All costs were standardized to 2005 dollars. RESULTS: A total of 275 observations were made, and 74 (26.9%) of these were associated with fluorouracil-based chemotherapy. Pharmacy staff spent an average of 11 minutes for bolus fluorouracil with leucovorin infusion (fluorouracil/LCV-IV) and 8 minutes for bolus fluorouracil with bolus leucovorin (fluorouracil/LCV-B). Patients who received fluorouracil/LCV-IV spent an average of 203 minutes in the clinic, whereas patients who received fluorouracil/LCV-B spent 110 minutes. The average cost of administering fluorouracil/LCV-IV was $933, which comprised drug costs ($279), dispensing costs ($189), and administration costs ($465). The average cost of fluorouracil/LCV-B was $474, which comprised drug costs ($65), dispensing costs ($141), and administration costs ($268). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to formally demonstrate the high cost of administering the injectable form of fluorouracil chemotherapy with leucovorin, despite relatively low drug acquisition cost. Therefore, reimbursement rates for fluorouracil should be calculated in such a way that covers all costs, including overhead costs for the department.

Impact of comorbid conditions and race/ethnicity on glycemic control among the US population with type 2 diabetes, 1988-1994 to 1999-2004.

OBJECTIVE: To measure trends in glycemic control in type 2 diabetes in the United States from 1988-1994 to 1999-2004 and to identify factors influencing glycemic control, including the presence of comorbid conditions and race/ethnicity. METHODS: Participants in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (1988-1994 and 1999-2004) aged ≥30 years with diagnosed type 2 diabetes were identified. Outcome measures included glycemic control [glycosylated hemoglobin (A1C) <7%] and pharmacologic treatment rate. Comorbid conditions assessed included obesity, hyperlipidemia, and hypertension. RESULTS: Prevalence of type 2 diabetes increased from 5.8% in 1988-1994 to 7.1% in 1999-2004. Rates of treatment for type 2 diabetes improved, from 72.3% to 82.2%. The proportion of patients who achieved A1C <7% did not change significantly (44.4% to 50.1%, P=.06); however, blood pressure and cholesterol level both improved. During 1999-2004, only 14% of persons treated for type 2 diabetes did not have an additional comorbid condition; 21% had all three comorbid conditions. During 1999-2004, among treated patients, non-Hispanic blacks were 0.43 times as likely (95% CI 0.29-0.63), and Mexican Americans were 0.47 times as likely (95% CI 0.32-0.68), to have A1C <7% compared to non-Hispanic whites. CONCLUSIONS: Despite improved treatment rates, one in two individuals with type 2 diabetes has A1C of ≥7%. Most type 2 diabetic subjects also suffer from hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and/or obesity, and glycemic control rates were lowest for those with all three conditions. Non-Hispanic blacks and Mexican Americans are less likely to achieve glycemic control as compared to non-Hispanic whites.