Independent Medical Examinations: facts and fallacies.

BACKGROUND: Independent Medical Examinations (IMEs) have protected the rights of workers in the United States since the first laws protecting employees were established in the early 1900s. There have been many social advancements and a great collective struggle over the last 100 years that have ultimately lead to justice for the injured or disabled worker. OBJECTIVE: We describe the origins of the IME as well as the evolution of both medical and social processes that have provided the legal framework for the correct practice of IMEs. This article will summarize the current medical principles, legal process, and social controversy embodying the modern IME. DISCUSSION: Medical professionals must adhere to the same principles of impartial and ethical conduct that they uphold in general patient care when dealing with IMEs. Although previously controversial, it is now clear following successful litigation of many physician examiners that at least a 'limited doctor-patient relationship' is created during an IME. LIMITATIONS: The limitations of this manuscript include a paucity of the literature, lack of IME updates, and certain conflicts with guidelines by various organizations. CONCLUSION: IMEs represent a valuable mechanism for determining alleged impairment and/or disability. In the current economic environment of declining reimbursement to physicians, IMEs exist outside the scope of traditional payment methods and offer competitive compensation.

Validation of ICD-9 Code 787.2 for identification of individuals with dysphagia from administrative databases.

The aim of this study was to determine the accuracy of dysphagia coding using the International Classification of Diseases version 9 (ICD-9) code 787.2. We used the administrative database of a tertiary hospital and sequential videofluorographic swallowing study (VFSS) reports for patients admitted to the same hospital from January to June 2007. The VFSS reports were abstracted and the hospital's database was queried to abstract the coding associated with the admission during which the VFSS was performed. The VFSS and administrative data were merged for data analysis. Dysphagia was coded (using code 787.2) in 36 of 168 cases that had a VFSS. Of these, 34 had dysphagia diagnosed by VFSS (our gold standard) and one had a prior history of dysphagia. Code 787.2 had sensitivity of 22.8, specificity of 89.5, and positive and negative predictive values of 94.4 and 12.9, respectively. Dysphagia was largely undercoded in this database, but when the code was present those individuals were very likely to be dysphagic. Selection of dysphagic cases using the ICD-9 code is appropriate for within-group comparisons. Absence of the code, however, is not a good predictor of the absence of dysphagia.

Supratentorial regions of acute ischemia associated with clinically important swallowing disorders: a pilot study.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Dysphagia is a common problem after stroke associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Except for patients with brain stem strokes, particularly lateral medullary strokes, it is difficult to predict which cases are likely to develop swallowing dysfunction based on their neuroimaging. Clear models of swallowing control and integration of cortico-bulbar input have not been defined and the role of subcortical structures is unclear. The purpose of this study was to identify supratentorial regions of interest (ROIs) that might be related to clinically important dysphagia in acute stroke patients, focusing on subcortical structures. METHODS: We studied 29 acute supratentorial ischemic stroke cases admitted to our institution between 2001 and 2005 diagnoses with first ischemic stroke and without history of swallowing dysfunction. Subjects had MRI within 24 hours. Cases were defined as those subjects who were diagnosed as dysphagic after clinical evaluation by a speech language pathologist (SLP) and whose dysphagia was considered clinically significant, ie, requiring treatment by diet modification. Controls were defined as those patients who: (1) passed the stroke unit's dysphagia screening, (2) had a clinical evaluation by SLP that did not result in a diagnosis of dysphagia or diet modifications, or (3) had no documented evidence of dysphagia evaluation or treatment during hospitalization and were discharged on a regular diet. A trained technician, blinded to case-control status, examined 12 ROIs for dysfunctional tissue in diffusion and perfusion-weighted images. The odds ratio (OR) of dysphagia was calculated for each ROI. Logistic regression models were used to adjust for stroke severity (NIHSS) and volume. RESULTS: Analysis of data on 14 cases and 15 controls demonstrated significant differences in the unadjusted odds of dysphagia for the following ROIs: (1) primary somatosensory, motor, and motor supplementary areas (PSSM; OR=10, P=0.009); (2) orbitofrontal cortex (OFC; OR=6.5, P=0.04); (3) putamen, caudate, basal ganglia (PCBG; OR=5.33, P=0.047); and (4) internal capsule (IC; OR=26; P=0.005). Nonsignificant differences were found in the insula and temporopolar cortex. Adjusted OR of dysphagia for subjects with strokes affecting the IC was 17.8 (P=0.03). Adjusted odds ratios for the PSSM, OFC, and PCBG were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Significantly increased odds of dysphagia were found in subjects with IC involvement. Other supratentorial areas that may be associated with dysphagia include the PSSM, OFC, and PCBG. Analysis of additional areas was limited by the number of subjects in our sample. Future studies with larger sample size are feasible and will contribute to the development of a full swallowing control model.