Harnessing a real-time location system for contact tracing in a busy emergency department.

BACKGROUND: With the persistent threat of emerging infectious diseases (EIDs), digital contact tracing (CT) tools can augment conventional CT for the prevention of healthcare-associated infectious disease transmission. However, their performance has yet to be evaluated comprehensively in the fast-paced emergency department (ED) setting. OBJECTIVE: This study compared the CT performance of a radiofrequency identification (RFID)-based real-time location system (RTLS) with conventional electronic medical record (EMR) review against continuous direct observation of close contacts ('gold standard') in a busy ED during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic period. METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted at the ED of a large tertiary care hospital in Singapore from December 2020 to April 2021. CT performance [sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and kappa] of the RTLS, EMR review and a combination of the two approaches (hybrid CT) was compared with direct observation. Finally, the mean absolute error (MAE) in the duration of each contact episode found via the RTLS and direct observation was calculated. RESULTS: In comparison with EMR review, both the RTLS and the hybrid CT approach had higher sensitivity (0.955 vs 0.455 for EMR review) and a higher NPV (0.997 vs 0.968 for EMR review). The RTLS had the highest PPV (0.777 vs 0.714 for EMR review vs 0.712 for hybrid CT). The RTLS had the strongest agreement with direct observation (kappa=0.848). The MAE between contact durations of 80 direct observations and their respective RTLS contact times was 1.81 min. CONCLUSION: The RTLS was validated to be a high-performing CT tool, with significantly higher sensitivity than conventional CT via EMR review. The RTLS can be used with confidence in time-strapped EDs for time-sensitive CT for the prevention of healthcare-associated transmission of EIDs.

First nosocomial cluster of COVID-19 due to the Delta variant in a major acute care hospital in Singapore: investigations and outbreak response.

OBJECTIVES: The first large nosocomial cluster of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Singapore in April 2021 led to partial closure of a major acute care hospital. This study examined factors associated with infection among patients, staff and visitors; investigated the possible role of aerosol-based transmission; evaluated the effectiveness of BNT162.b2 and mRNA1273 vaccines; and described the successful containment of the cluster. METHODS: Close contacts of patients with COVID-19 and the affected ward were identified and underwent surveillance for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. Patient, staff and visitor cohorts were constructed and factors associated with infection were evaluated. Phylogenetic analysis of patient samples was performed. Ward air exhaust filters were tested for SARS-CoV-2. RESULTS: In total, there were 47 cases, comprising 29 patients, nine staff, six visitors and three household contacts. All infections were of the Delta variant. Ventilation studies showed turbulent air flow and swabs from air exhaust filters were positive for SARS-CoV-2. Vaccine breakthrough infections were seen in both patients and staff. Among patients, vaccination was associated with a 79% lower odds of infection with COVID-19 (adjusted odds ratio 0.21, 95% confidence interval 0.05-0.95). CONCLUSIONS: This cluster occurred despite enhancement of infection control measures that the hospital had undertaken at the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. It was brought under control rapidly through case isolation, extensive contact tracing and quarantine measures, and led to enhanced use of hospital personal protective equipment, introduction of routine rostered testing of inpatients and staff, and changes in hospital infrastructure to improve ventilation within general wards.

Length of stay and odds of MRSA acquisition: a dose-response relationship?

The association between methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) colonisation and/or infection with increased morbidity and mortality among hospital patients has long been recognised. We sought to build on previous studies to identify modifiable risk factors associated with the acquisition of MRSA colonisation and infection by conducting a retrospective cohort study on patients admitted through the Emergency Department of an acute tertiary-care general hospital in Singapore which implemented universal on-admission MRSA screening. Patients were assigned to the acquisition or non-acquisition group depending on whether they acquired MRSA during their admission. We used logistic regression models with a patient being in the acquisition group as the binary outcome to identify factors associated with MRSA acquisition. A total of 1302 acquisition and 37 949 non-acquisition group patients were analysed. Fifteen variables were included in the multivariate model. A dose-response relationship between length of stay and odds of MRSA acquisition was observed, with a length of stay 3 weeks or more (Adj OR 11.78-57.36, all P < 0.001) being the single biggest predictor of MRSA acquisition. Other variables significantly associated with MRSA acquisition were: male gender, age 65 or greater, previous MRSA colonisation or infection, exposure to certain antibiotics and surgery, and history of diabetes.

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus colonisation: epidemiological and molecular characteristics in an acute-care tertiary hospital in Singapore.

Current knowledge of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) colonisation in relation to epidemiological characteristics is incomplete. We conducted a cross-sectional study at an acute-care tertiary infectious diseases hospital of MRSA isolates identified through routine surveillance from January 2009 to December 2011. We randomly selected 205 MRSA isolates (119 inpatients) from 798 isolates (427 inpatients) for molecular profiling using multilocus sequence typing. Multilevel multinomial logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratio (OR) assessing the predilection of MRSA strains for anatomic sites, and associations of strains with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. The most frequent sequence types (STs) were 239, 22 and 45. The proportion of ST22 increased over the sampling period, replacing ST239 as the dominant lineage. However, ST239 remained the most prevalent among HIV-seropositive individuals who were six times more likely to be colonised with this strain than non-HIV patients (adjusted OR (aOR) 6.44, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.94-21.36). ST45 was >24 times more likely to be associated with perianal colonisation than in the nares, axillae and groin sites (aOR 24.20, 95% CI 1.45-403.26). This study underlines the clonal replacement of MRSA in Singapore as previously reported but revealed, in addition, key strain differences between HIV-infected and non-infected individuals hospitalised in the same environment.

Neuraminidase inhibitors, superinfection and corticosteroids affect survival of influenza patients.

We aimed to study factors influencing outcomes of adults hospitalised for seasonal and pandemic influenza.  Individual-patient data from three Asian cohorts (Hong Kong, Singapore and Beijing; N=2649) were analysed. Adults hospitalised for laboratory-confirmed influenza (prospectively diagnosed) during 2008-2011 were studied. The primary outcome measure was 30-day survival. Multivariate Cox regression models (time-fixed and time-dependent) were used. Patients had high morbidity (respiratory/nonrespiratory complications in 68.4%, respiratory failure in 48.6%, pneumonia in 40.8% and bacterial superinfections in 10.8%) and mortality (5.9% at 30 days and 6.9% at 60 days). 75.2% received neuraminidase inhibitors (NAI) (73.8% received oseltamivir and 1.4% received peramivir/zanamivir; 44.5% of patients received NAI ≤2 days and 65.5% ≤5 days after onset of illness); 23.1% received systemic corticosteroids. There were fewer deaths among NAI-treated patients (5.3% versus 7.6%; p=0.032). NAI treatment was independently associated with survival (adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 0.28, 95% CI 0.19-0.43), adjusted for treatment-propensity score and patient characteristics. Superinfections increased (adjusted HR 2.18, 95% CI 1.52-3.11) and chronic statin use decreased (adjusted HR 0.44, 95% CI 0.23-0.84) death risks. Best survival was shown when treatment started within ≤2 days (adjusted HR 0.20, 95% CI 0.12-0.32), but there was benefit with treatment within 3-5 days (adjusted HR 0.35, 95% CI 0.21-0.58). Time-dependent analysis showed consistent results of NAI treatment (adjusted HR 0.39, 95% CI 0.27-0.57). Corticosteroids increased superinfection (9.7% versus 2.7%) and deaths when controlled for indications (adjusted HR 1.73, 95% CI 1.14-2.62). Early NAI treatment was associated with shorter length of stay in a subanalysis. NAI treatment may improve survival of hospitalised influenza patients; benefit is greatest from, but not limited to, treatment started within 2 days of illness. Superinfections and corticosteroids increase mortality. Antiviral and non-antiviral management strategies should be considered.