The relationship between active renin concentration and plasma renin activity in Type 1 diabetes.

AIMS: Circulating activity of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) can be assessed by measuring plasma active renin concentration (ARE), as well as by measuring plasma renin activity (PRA). We aimed to assess the relationships between ARE and PRA in Type 1 diabetic compared with non-diabetic control subjects. We also assessed concentrations of the active renin precursor, prorenin. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-five Type 1 diabetic subjects and 34 non-diabetic control subjects were assessed. Groups had similar ages, sex distributions, body mass indices, systolic and diastolic blood pressures. PRA was measured by radioimmunoassay of angiotensin I generation from endogenous substrate. ARE and total renin concentration (TRE) were measured by immunoradiometric assay (Nichols Institute Diagnostics, USA). Prorenin concentration was calculated as the difference between ARE and TRE. RESULTS: PRA was significantly lower in Type 1 diabetic than in control subjects (0.8 (0.4-1.1) vs. 1.1 (0.9-1.9) pmol/ml per h; P < 0.005), while ARE was similar (17 (9-33) vs. 18 (15-25) mU/l; P = 0.548). PRA (loge transformed) correlated strongly with ARE in diabetic (r = 0.49; P = 0.003) and control subjects (r = 0.59; P = 0.0002), but there was significant vertical separation of the regression lines for the two groups (P < 0.0001). Prorenin concentrations were significantly higher in Type 1 diabetic subjects (249 (170-339) vs. 171 (153-219) mU/l; P = 0.005). Diabetic subjects with high prorenin concentrations (> 400 mU/l (control mean + 3 SD)) were more likely to have microalbuminuria (P = 0.027) and peripheral neuropathy (P = 0.049). CONCLUSIONS: Type 1 diabetes is associated with an altered relationship between ARE and PRA, such that ARE is higher for a given PRA compared with non-diabetic control subjects. Both ARE and PRA are used to assess circulating RAAS activity. The altered relationship between the two in Type 1 diabetic subjects suggests that neither parameter alone is necessarily an adequate and reliable index of such activity. Higher prorenin concentrations, particularly in association with microvascular complications, were confirmed in the Type 1 diabetic subjects. Diabet. Med. 18, 451-458 (2001)

Clinical usefulness of biochemical resorption markers in osteoporosis.

We have evaluated three commercial assays for collagen cross-links, two urine assays and a recently developed serum assay, as markers of bone turnover in 30 postmenopausal women with osteoporosis during their first year of treatment with the anti-resorptive drug alendronate. Before treatment, urine free deoxypyridinoline crosslinks (Dpd), urine N-telopeptide crosslinks (NTx) and serum C-telopeptide (CTx) values were within postmenopausal reference ranges. After 3 months' treatment the decrease in NTx and CTx was greater than that of Dpd (-50%, P < 0.0001 and -48%, P < 0.0001, compared with -11%, NS), as it was after 6 months (-51%, P < 0.0001, and -57%, P < 0.0001, compared with -19%, P < 0.01). The decrease in resorption markers after 6 months was significant in 23% (Dpd), 66% (NTx) and 66% (CTx) of individuals. Neither baseline resorption marker values nor the per cent change after 6 months' therapy correlated with bone mineral density change (BMD) at either lumbar spine or femoral neck after one year's therapy, except baseline Dpd and lumbar spine BMD (P < 0.01). We conclude that NTx and serum CTx were more sensitive markers of bone turnover suppression by alendronate, but only baseline Dpd was useful in the prediction of individual bone density response after one year.

Clinical usefulness of bone alkaline phosphatase in osteoporosis.

We have evaluated two commercial assays for serum bone specific alkaline phosphatase (bALP) as a marker of bone turnover in a group of 35 postmenopausal women with osteoporosis during their first year of treatment with the anti-resorptive drug, alendronate. The immunoradiometric assay (bALP-I) measured protein mass, whereas the immunocapture assay (bALP-E) measured activity. Before treatment, bALP values with both methods were within the postmenopausal reference ranges. Treatment with alendronate produced a decrease in bALP after 3 months, reaching a plateau after 6 months: for bALP-I a mean change of -34%, (P < 0.0001), bALP-E, -19% (P < 0.001), and total ALP, -19% (P < 0.0001). The decrease was significant in 53% (bALP-I) and 31% (bALP-E) of patients. The ratio of serum bALP-E/bALP-I in patients was not constant but rose after therapy with alendronate. Neither baseline bALP, nor the per cent change in bALP after 6 months, correlated with bone mineral density (BMD) change after 1 year at either lumbar spine or femoral neck. We conclude that bALP-I appeared to be a more sensitive marker of the suppression of bone turnover by alendronate than did bALP-E, but that neither was useful in the detection of osteoporosis, nor the prediction of individual BMD response to alendronate therapy.