Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 11 de 11
Filter
1.
Top Stroke Rehabil ; 30(5): 501-511, 2023 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35491995

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Many studies have confirmed the psychometric properties of Fugl-Meyer Assessment of the upper extremity (FMA-UE). Although several modified versions of the FMA-UE form exist, their structural validity has not been fully established. OBJECTIVES: To assess the structural validity and internal consistency of the original, short, and hypothesized FMA-UE forms. METHODS: In this cross-sectional, multicenter, observational study, the factor structure was assessed using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to evaluate the adequate model of each hypothetical FMA-UE form (original, 30-item, 27-item, and 6-item forms). The internal consistency of each FMA-UE form and subscale was assessed using Cronbach's alpha after factor structure evaluation. RESULTS: We recruited 363 patients with first-episode stroke (median age = 70.0, median days = 75.0). The results of the original form models were not estimated by CFA. Of all FMA-UE forms, the 30-item form lacked three reflex items (4-factor, 30-item model) and the 27-item form lacked three reflex and three coordination items (3-factor, 27-item, second-order model); these forms demonstrated an adequate model fitness (root mean square error of approximation = 0.056/0.059, comparative fit index = 0.995/0.996, Tucker-Lewis index = 0.995/0.995). The 6-item form demonstrated a poor model fit. All FMA-UE forms and subscales showed a high internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha>0.91). CONCLUSIONS: Both 30- and 27-item FMA-UE forms showed a good factor structure; therefore, these forms are eligible for use in clinical practice. However, future studies should define the factor structure of the 6-item form.


Subject(s)
Stroke Rehabilitation , Stroke , Humans , Aged , Stroke Rehabilitation/methods , Cross-Sectional Studies , Disability Evaluation , Reproducibility of Results , Upper Extremity
2.
Top Stroke Rehabil ; 29(8): 579-587, 2022 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34414858

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The Fugl-Meyer Assessment of the Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) has been used in many clinical studies and in stroke rehabilitation. In studies evaluating psychometric properties, confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) indicated that the FMA-UE is a multidimensional tool. Item Response Theory One-Parameter Logistic (IRT1PL) supports that item-difficulty hierarchy can be used as a treatment index of upper extremity function for stroke recovery. However, studies on the psychometric properties of the FMA-UE in Asian populations are lacking. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the dimensionality and item-difficulty hierarchy of the FMA-UE for stroke rehabilitation in Japanese patients. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study. The participants comprised 268 individuals admitted for de novo stroke (median age, 70.0 years; median days since stroke onset, 78.5) in 22 hospitals in Japan. The dimensionality of the FMA-UE was evaluated using CFA of selected items. The item-difficulty hierarchy of the FMA-UE using the appropriately selected model was demonstrated using IRT1PL analysis after confirming dimensionality. RESULTS: Two reflex items were removed by utilizing the floor and ceiling effects. The 31- and 30-item FMA-UE exhibited a good model fit of the unidimensionality in the CFA. The 30-item FMA-UE was found to be a good model by model comparison (the 31-item vs. the 30-item). The item-difficulty hierarchy of the 30-item FMA-UE was found not to be consistent with the expected item order. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides evidence that the FMA-UE has multidimensionality and the 30-item FMA-UE is a valid instrument for measuring upper-extremity impairment after stroke.


Subject(s)
Stroke Rehabilitation , Stroke , Aged , Cross-Sectional Studies , Disability Evaluation , Humans , Japan , Recovery of Function/physiology , Upper Extremity
3.
Hong Kong J Occup Ther ; 34(1): 3-12, 2021 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34408554

ABSTRACT

AIMS: This study was to test the reliability and validity of the Assessment of Positive Occupational 15 (APO-15) for individuals experiencing mental illness. METHODS: A sample of 408 people experiencing mental illness living in communities or admitted to hospitalized was recruited. The sample has completed demographic information, the Assessment of Positive Occupation 15 (APO-15), the Japanese version of the Self-identified Stage of Recovery Part-B (SISR-B), the Japanese version of the Recovery Assessment Scale (RAS), the General Health Questionnaire 12 (GHQ-12). APO-15 is a measure of how engaged one is in occupations that promote well-being. The final version of the APO-15 was developed by assessing the validity and reliability by mainly using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), item response theory (IRT). RESULTS: This study indicated satisfactory the validity and reliability of APO-15 in a group of individuals experiencing mental illness. CFA showed acceptable values for all indices of fit, namely comparative fit index (CFI), Tucker-Lewis index (TLI) (i.e., greater than .90), and the value of root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) was .087, which was acceptable. The IRT showed satisfactory responses for the item slope parameter (α) and item difficulty parameter (ß) in APO-15. DISCUSSION: APO-15 was demonstrated good psychometric properties in measuring involvement in the occupation to promote well-being in individuals experiencing mental illness. In conclusion, the APO-15 is an important tool to enable occupational therapists to assess clients who are not engaged in well-being promoting occupations and thus enable them to participate in such occupations.

4.
Work ; 64(4): 833-841, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31815723

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Occupational dysfunction is frequent among healthcare workers, but little is known about factors related to occupational participation and stress coping behavior among healthcare workers. This cross-sectional study aimed to analyze structural relationships among occupational dysfunction, stress coping, and occupational participation in healthcare workers. METHODS: Participants were 601 healthcare workers in 13 facilities. Data were collected with participant profile, Classification and Assessment of Occupational Dysfunction (CAOD), Coping Scale (CS), and Self-completed Occupational Performance Index (SOPI). Data were analyzed by descriptive statistics, item response theory (IRT), confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), correlation analysis, and path analysis. RESULTS: CFAs of CAOD, CS, and SOPI indicated good fit to the predicted models. In IRT, CAOD and SOPI showed conformity, but two items of CS showed nonconformity. The correlation between CAOD-SOPI was high to moderate (-0.486 to -0.246; p < 0.001), whereas that between CAOD and emotion-focused coping was weakly negative. SOPI and CS were negatively associated with occupational dysfunction (p < 0.000). CONCLUSIONS: This model demonstrated that SOPI and CS had a negative structural relationship with occupational dysfunction. Therefore, it seems important to encourage occupational participation (in the areas of self-care, productivity, and leisure) to reduce occupational dysfunction in healthcare workers.


Subject(s)
Adaptation, Psychological , Health Personnel/psychology , Occupational Stress , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Japan , Male , Middle Aged , Occupational Health , Surveys and Questionnaires
5.
Health Qual Life Outcomes ; 17(1): 59, 2019 Apr 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30975154

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to develop and perform cross-cultural validation of a Japanese version of the Adult Social Care Outcomes Toolkit (ASCOT) four-level Self-Completion questionnaire (SCT4) instrument to measure Social-Care Related Quality of Life. It was important to develop a Japanese version of the ASCOT-SCT4 and validate it in the Japanese context, given the interest in measuring outcomes of social care services in Japan. METHODS: The original version of ASCOT-SCT4 was translated into Japanese following good practice guidelines. Additionally, comments and feedback were obtained from an independent committee engaged in managing and providing social care services to refine the flow of sentences of the newly developed translated version. The resulting version was tested for cross-cultural validation among community-dwelling adults who use social care services to confirm the factorial structure and the scale system of the Japanese version, using Structural Equation Modeling and Item Response Theory. RESULTS: Vigorous discussion was needed to translate the original version into Japanese especially for the items control over daily life and dignity. These two items were linguistically difficult to express in everyday language so potential participants could easily understand the intended concepts. In the cross-cultural validation, we obtained values for model fit within the acceptable range: between 0.706 and 0.550 for factor loadings, 0.923 for the Comparative Fit Index, 0.910 for the Tucker-Lewis Index, and 0.083 for the Root Mean Square Error of Approximation. This confirmed the factorial structure of the Japanese version. The IRT analysis, however, revealed that the scale system needed refinement to facilitate appropriate differentiation between each response option. CONCLUSIONS: This study provided preliminary evidence that the Japanese version of ASCOT-SCT4 is valid. As a result, the Japanese version was finalized and approved by the instrument developer.


Subject(s)
Patient Reported Outcome Measures , Quality of Life , Activities of Daily Living , Adult , Aged , Cross-Cultural Comparison , Female , Humans , Independent Living/statistics & numerical data , Japan , Male , Middle Aged , Reproducibility of Results , Social Work , Translations
6.
Am J Occup Ther ; 73(6): 7306205040p1-7306205040p9, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31891343

ABSTRACT

IMPORTANCE: Elucidation of the relationship between belief conflict and occupational dysfunction in occupational health is needed. Knowledge of this relationship is important to the development of preventive occupational therapy. OBJECTIVE: To examine the relationship between belief conflict and occupational dysfunction. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. Participants were recruited via nonrandom sampling, and data were analyzed with Bayesian modeling. SETTING: Health care institutions in Japan. PARTICIPANTS: Participants were 890 health care workers. OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Data were collected by means of the Participant Profile, the Assessment of Belief Conflict in Relationship-14 (ABCR-14), and the Classification and Assessment of Occupational Dysfunction. RESULTS: Belief conflict and occupational dysfunction showed moderate to strong positive correlations. The cutoff value for the ABCR-14 was estimated to be 58 points. The odds ratio indicated that groups with high belief conflict were very likely to experience occupational dysfunction. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: These findings show that belief conflict and occupational dysfunction are more than moderately associated. Longitudinal studies are needed to prove the causal relationship between belief conflict and occupational dysfunction. WHAT THIS ARTICLE ADDS: Considering that those falling into the high-belief-conflict group are likely to experience occupational dysfunction, it is necessary to focus efforts not only on teamwork but also on the improvement of health. Preventive occupational therapy needs to assume a leading role in improving the occupational health of health care workers who experience belief conflict and occupational dysfunction.


Subject(s)
Burnout, Professional/psychology , Health Personnel , Interprofessional Relations , Bayes Theorem , Cross-Sectional Studies , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Surveys and Questionnaires
7.
Prog Rehabil Med ; 2: 20170003, 2017.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32789210

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Elderly people's success in attaining rehabilitation goals may be heavily dependent on their achievement motive, but research has not identified the factors that impact on achievement motive or suggested any effective interventions to enhance it. This study demonstrated the effects of personality traits, theories of intelligence, and other factors on achievement motive among community-dwelling elderly people. METHODS: The dataset consisted of questionnaire responses from 281 elderly people in day-service or day-care centers. A hypothetical model, based on previous research, proposed that achievement motive would be affected by personality traits, theory of intelligence, and other factors (such as drinking and smoking habits, going out for activities, marital status, and hobbies); that personality traits would have some effect on the theory of intelligence and other factors; and that the theory of intelligence would affect personal factors. The hypothetical model was analyzed using a structural equation modeling approach. RESULTS: The model was modified by removing statistically insignificant paths to achievement motive. The modified model exhibited an excellent fit and showed that achievement motive was affected by personality traits, going out for activities, and marital status (although, surprisingly, single people had stronger achievement motive). The model had an adjusted R2 of 0.593 (P < 0.001) for achievement motive. CONCLUSION: The results indicated that three of the Big Five personality traits (extraversion, conscientiousness, and openness to experience) tend to enhance elderly people's motivation to achieve their goals; moreover, going out more frequently and being single were also associated with achievement motive.

8.
PeerJ ; 4: e1655, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26835188

ABSTRACT

Background. Achievement motive is defined as the intention to achieve one's goals. Achievement motive is assumed to promote clients to choices and actions toward their valuable goal, so it is an important consideration in rehabilitation. Purpose. The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the structural relationship among achievement motive on purpose in life, social participation, and role expectation of community-dwelling elderly people. Methods. Participants were community-dwelling elderly people in day-service centers. A total of 281 participants (male: 127, female: 154) answered the self-administered questionnaire in cross-sectional research. The questionnaire was comprised of demographic data and scales that evaluated achievement motive, social participation, purpose in life, and role expectation. We studied the structural relationship established by our hypothesized model via a structural equation modeling approach. Results. We checked the standardized path coefficients and the modification indices; the modified model's statistics were a good fit: CFI = 0.984, TLI = 0.983, RMSEA = 0.050, 90% CI [0.044-0.055]. Achievement motive had a significantly direct effect on purpose in life (direct effect = 0.445, p value < 0.001), a significantly indirect effect on purpose in life via social participation or role expectation (indirect effect = 0.170, p value < 0.001) and a total effect on purpose in life (total effect = 0.615). Discussion. This result suggests that enhancing the intention to achieve one's goals enables participants to feel a spirit of challenge with a purpose and a sense of fulfillment in their daily lives.

9.
PeerJ ; 3: e1389, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26618078

ABSTRACT

Purpose. The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the hypothetical model based on structural relationship with the occupational dysfunction on psychological problems (stress response, burnout syndrome, and depression) in healthcare workers. Method. Three cross sectional studies were conducted to assess the following relations: (1) occupational dysfunction on stress response (n = 468), (2) occupational dysfunction on burnout syndrome (n = 1,142), and (3) occupational dysfunction on depression (n = 687). Personal characteristics were collected through a questionnaire (such as age, gender, and job category, opportunities for refreshment, time spent on leisure activities, and work relationships) as well as the Classification and Assessment of Occupational Dysfunction (CAOD). Furthermore, study 1 included the Stress Response Scale-18 (SRS-18), study 2 used the Japanese Burnout Scale (JBS), and study 3 employed the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D). The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), exploratory factor analysis (EFA), and path analysis of structural equation modeling (SEM) analysis were used in all of the studies. EFA and CFA were used to measure structural validity of four assessments; CAOD, SRS-18, JBS, and CES-D. For examination of a potential covariate, we assessed the correlation of the total and factor score of CAOD and personal factors in all studies. Moreover, direct and indirect effects of occupational dysfunction on stress response (Study 1), burnout syndrome (Study 2), and depression (Study 3) were also analyzed. Results. In study 1, CAOD had 16 items and 4 factors. In Study 2 and 3, CAOD had 16 items and 5 factors. SRS-18 had 18 items and 3 factors, JBS had 17 items and 3 factors, and CES-D had 20 items and 4 factors. All studies found that there were significant correlations between the CAOD total score and the personal factor that included opportunities for refreshment, time spent on leisure activities, and work relationships (p < 0.01). The hypothesis model results suggest that the classification of occupational dysfunction had good fit on the stress response (RMSEA = 0.061, CFI = 0.947, and TLI = 0.943), burnout syndrome (RMSEA = 0.076, CFI = 0.919, and TLI = 0.913), and depression (RMSEA = 0.060, CFI = 0.922, TLI = 0.917). Moreover, the detected covariates include opportunities for refreshment, time spent on leisure activities, and work relationships on occupational dysfunction. Conclusion. Our findings indicate that psychological problems are associated with occupational dysfunction in healthcare workers. Reduction of occupational dysfunction might be a strategy of better preventive occupational therapies for healthcare workers with psychological problems. However, longitudinal studies will be needed to determine a causal relationship.

10.
PLoS One ; 10(8): e0129349, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26247356

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Nurses and other healthcare workers frequently experience belief conflict, one of the most important, new stress-related problems in both academic and clinical fields. METHODS: In this study, using a sample of 1,683 nursing practitioners, we developed The Assessment of Belief Conflict in Relationship-14 (ABCR-14), a new scale that assesses belief conflict in the healthcare field. Standard psychometric procedures were used to develop and test the scale, including a qualitative framework concept and item-pool development, item reduction, and scale development. We analyzed the psychometric properties of ABCR-14 according to entropy, polyserial correlation coefficient, exploratory factor analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, average variance extracted, Cronbach's alpha, Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient, and multidimensional item response theory (MIRT). RESULTS: The results of the analysis supported a three-factor model consisting of 14 items. The validity and reliability of ABCR-14 was suggested by evidence from high construct validity, structural validity, hypothesis testing, internal consistency reliability, and concurrent validity. The result of the MIRT offered strong support for good item response of item slope parameters and difficulty parameters. However, the ABCR-14 Likert scale might need to be explored from the MIRT point of view. Yet, as mentioned above, there is sufficient evidence to support that ABCR-14 has high validity and reliability. CONCLUSION: The ABCR-14 demonstrates good psychometric properties for nursing belief conflict. Further studies are recommended to confirm its application in clinical practice.


Subject(s)
Burnout, Professional/psychology , Nurses/psychology , Psychometrics/methods , Adult , Conflict, Psychological , Factor Analysis, Statistical , Female , Humans , Interprofessional Relations , Male , Middle Aged , Nurse-Patient Relations , Surveys and Questionnaires
11.
PLoS One ; 10(8): e0134695, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26263375

ABSTRACT

Occupational therapy is involved in disability prevention and health enhancement through the prevention of occupational dysfunction. Although many occupational dysfunction scales exist, no standard method is available for the assessment and classification of occupational dysfunction, which may include occupational imbalance, occupational deprivation, occupational alienation, and occupational marginalization. The purpose of this study was to develop the final version of Classification and Assessment of Occupational Dysfunction (CAOD). Our study demonstrated the validity and reliability of CAOD in a group of undergraduate students. The CAOD scale includes 16 items and addresses the following 4 domains: occupational imbalance, occupational deprivation, occupational alienation, and occupational marginalization.


Subject(s)
Disability Evaluation , Adolescent , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Occupational Therapy , Psychometrics , Reproducibility of Results , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...