Exploring the Landscape of Anti-Inflammatory Trials: A Comprehensive Review of Strategies for Targeting Inflammation in Acute Myocardial Infraction.

The role of inflammation in the pathophysiology of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is well established. In recognizing inflammation's pivotal role in AMI, this manuscript systematically traces the historical studies spanning from early attempts to the present landscape. Several anti-inflammatory trials targeting inflammation in post-AMI have been performed, and this review includes the key trials, as well as examines their designs, patient demographics, and primary outcomes. Efficacies and challenges are analyzed, thereby shedding light on the translational implications of trial outcomes. This article also discusses emerging trends, ongoing research, and potential future directions in the field. Practical applications and implications for clinical practice are considered by providing a holistic view of the evolving landscape of anti-inflammatory interventions in the context of AMI.

Myocarditis Related to the Use of Mesalazine.

Myocarditis is a rare complication of therapy with mesalazine, a drug traditionally used in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease. We report a case of a 32-year-old man with a recent diagnosis of ulcerative colitis, who presented to our hospital with chest pain and elevated troponin, 12 days following initiation of mesalazine. Diagnosis of myocarditis was confirmed with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR), which showed subepicardial gadolinium enhancement in the basal lateral/inferolateral segment of the heart. The patient's clinical condition improved upon stopping mesalazine and the follow-up CMR demonstrated resolution of the previous findings. Mesalazine can cause myocarditis early after initiation and clinicians should be aware of this rare yet serious cardiotoxic effect, as the discontinuation of the medication is the mainstay of treatment and leads to significant recovery.

Role of inflammation following an acute myocardial infarction: design of INFINITY.

After a myocardial infarction, the inflammatory response is connected to major adverse outcomes such as ischemia-reperfusion injury, adverse cardiac remodeling, infarct size and poor prognosis. INFlammatIoN amI sTudY (INFINITY) is a multicenter, prospective, observational, cohort study designed to investigate the prognostic role of the cytokines IL-6, IL-10, IL-18 and IL-17 and the adipokines leptin, apelin and chemerin in patients with acute coronary syndrome. The study will test if these inflammatory biomarkers reflect different clinical manifestations of coronary artery disease and have a prognostic role in a 6-month follow-up period. This study represents an opportunity to investigate further the prognostic role of a selected combination of proinflammatory and anti-inflammatory biomarkers in the prognosis and risk stratification of acute coronary syndrome patients.

Influence of the Second Wave of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Management of Patients with ST-T Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction.

The ongoing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has caused a global health crisis. This prospective, observational, single-centre, cohort study investigated the influence of the second wave of the pandemic on the treatment of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients admitted to the largest tertiary centre in Nicosia, Cyprus. We measured onset-to-door (O2D) time, door-to-balloon (D2B) time, onset-to-balloon (O2B) time, and 30-day mortality for 250 consecutive patients who presented directly or were transferred to Nicosia General Hospital from 1 January 2021, to 31 December 2021, during the second wave of the pandemic in Cyprus. We compared a control group of patients with similar clinical characteristics admitted before the COVID-19 outbreak. Median O2D time was increased from 89 min to 120 min (p-value=0.094). D2B time was not increased significantly (85.5 vs. 87 min, p-value=0.137). The total ischemic time (O2B time) was increased from 173.5 min to 232.5 min, respectively (173.5 vs. 232.5, p=0.001). During the pandemic, more patients presented with cardiogenic shock (3.94 vs. 13.6, p=0.001) and with cardiac arrest (9.85 vs. 17.2, p=0.035,) while there was an increase in 30-day mortality (4.43% vs. 8.8%, p-value=0.100). Patients with STEMI during the second wave of the COVID-19 pandemic seem to have presentation delays with increased total ischaemic times, presented more commonly in cardiogenic shock or cardiac arrest, increasing 30-day mortality.