The Magic Number 63 - Redefining the Geriatric Age for Massive Transfusion in Trauma.

INTRODUCTION: The arbitrary geriatric age cutoff of 65 may not accurately define older adults at higher risk of mortality following massive transfusion (MT). We sought to redefine a new geriatric age threshold for MT and understand its association with outcomes. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The 2013-2018 Trauma Quality Improvement Program database was queried for all adults who received ≥10 units of packed red blood cells (pRBCs) within 24 h of admission. A bootstrap analysis using multiple logistic regression established transfusion futility thresholds (TTs), where additional pRBCs no longer improved mortality for various age cutoffs. The age cutoff at which the TT for those relatively older and relatively younger was statistically significant was used to define the new "geriatric" age for MT. Outcomes were then compared between the newly defined geriatric and nongeriatric patients. RESULTS: The difference in TT first became significant when the age cutoff was 63 y. The TT for patients aged ≥63 y (new geriatric, n = 2870) versus <63 y (nongeriatric, n = 17,302) was 34 and 40 units of pRBCs, respectively (P = 0.04). Although geriatric patients had a higher Glasgow coma scale score (9 versus 6, P < 0.01) and lower abbreviated injury score-abdomen (3 versus 4, P < 0.01) than the nongeriatric, they suffered higher overall mortality (62% versus 45%, P < 0.01). A lower percentage of geriatric patients were discharged to home (7% versus 35%, P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The new geriatric age for MT is 63 y, with a TT of 34 units. Despite suffering less severe injuries, physiologically "geriatric" patients have worse outcomes following MT.

Geographic and demographic trends with the initiation of virtual interviews in general surgery: A 7-program evaluation.

BACKGROUND: Although most general surgery residency interviews remain virtual, the effect of this format remains understudied. Single-institution data have shown an increase in the number of applications received and interviews conducted with virtual interviewing but no change in the geographic backgrounds of interviewed or matched applicants. This study sought to compare national trends in geographic characteristics of general surgery applicants, interviewed applicants, and matched applicants between in-person and virtual application cycles. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective review of 7 general surgery residency programs from application years 2016-2019 (in-person) and 2020-2021 (virtual) was conducted. Data collected included birth year, sex, race, medical school state, and contact location at the time of application. Data were analyzed using generalized mixed effects linear models. RESULTS: A total of 52,742 applicants, 4,550 interviewed applicants, and 329 matched applicants were included. During virtual application cycles, there were no increases in the average number of applicants (P = .25), interviewed applicants (P = .36), or matched (P = .84) applicants per year. Virtual cycles were associated with a larger proportion of interviews conducted with applicants from out-of-state medical schools (P < .01) and listing out-of-state contact locations (P < .01) compared with in-person application cycles. There were no significant geographic differences in matched applicants between virtual and in-person application cycles. CONCLUSION: Virtual application cycles had greater geographic diversity among interviewed applicants. However, similar differences were not seen in the geographic diversity of matched applicants. Additional efforts should focus on why no changes in the geographic diversity of matched applicants were identified.

Plan Chest Film Versus Computed Tomography of the Chest as the Initial Imaging Modality for Blunt Thoracic Injury.

BACKGROUND: While chest X-ray (CXR) is an efficient tool for expeditious detection of life-threatening injury, chest computed tomography (CCT) is more sensitive albeit with added time, cost, and radiation. Thus far, there is limited evidence and lack of consensus on the best imaging practices. We sought to determine the association between imaging modality and outcomes in isolated blunt thoracic trauma. METHODS: The 2017-2020 TQIP database was queried for adult patients who sustained isolated blunt chest trauma and underwent chest imaging within 24 hours of admission. Patients who underwent CCT were 2:1 propensity-score-matched to those who underwent CXR. The primary outcome was mortality, and the secondary outcomes were hospital and ICU length of stay (LOS), ICU admission, need for and days requiring mechanical ventilation, complications, and discharge location. RESULTS: Propensity score matching yielded 17 716 patients with CCT and 8861 with CXR. While bivariate analysis showed lower 24-hr (CCT .2% vs CXR .4%, P = .0015) and in-hospital mortality (CCT 1.2% vs CXR 1.5%, P = .0454) in the CCT group, there was no difference in survival probability between groups (P = .1045). A higher percentage of CCT patients were admitted to the ICU (CCT 26.9% vs CXR 21.9%, P < .0001) and discharged to rehab (CCT .8% vs CXR .5%, P = .0178). DISCUSSION: CT offers no survival benefit over CXR in isolated blunt thoracic trauma. While CCT should be considered if clinically unclear, CXR likely suffices as an initial screening tool. These findings facilitate optimal resource allocation in constrained environments.

Reimagining general surgery resident selection: Collaborative innovation through design thinking.

Introduction: The process by which surgery residency programs select applicants is complex, opaque, and susceptible to bias. Despite attempts by program directors and educational researchers to address these issues, residents have limited ability to affect change within the process at present. Here, we present the results of a design thinking brainstorm to improve resident selection and propose this technique as a framework for surgical residents to creatively solve problems and generate actionable changes. Methods: Members of the Collaboration of Surgical Education Fellows (CoSEF) used the design thinking framework to brainstorm ways to improve the resident selection process. Members participated in one virtual focus group focused on identifying pain points and developing divergent solutions to those pain points. Pain points and solutions were subsequently organized into themes. Finally, members participated in a second virtual focus group to design prototypes to test the proposed solutions. Results: Sixteen CoSEF members participated in one or both focus groups. Participants identified twelve pain points and 57 potential solutions. Pain points and solutions were grouped into the three themes of transparency, fairness, and applicant experience. Members subsequently developed five prototype ideas that could be rapidly developed and tested to improve resident selection. Conclusions: The design thinking framework can help surgical residents come up with creative ideas to improve pain points within surgical training. Furthermore, this framework can supplement existing quantitative and qualitative methods within surgical education research. Future work will be needed to implement the prototypes devised during our sessions and turn them into complete interventions. Key message: In this paper, we demonstrate the results of a resident-led design thinking brainstorm on improving resident selection in which our team identified twelve pain points in resident selection, ideated 57 solutions, and developed five prototypes for further testing. In addition to sharing our results, we believe design thinking can be a useful framework for creative problem solving within surgical education.

Gun violence revictimization in New York State: What increases the risk of being shot again?

BACKGROUND: While gun injuries are more likely to occur in in urban settings and affect people of color, factors associated with gun violence revictimization-suffering multiple incidents of gun violence-are unknown. We examined victim demographics and environmental factors associated with gun violence revictimization in New York state (NYS). METHODS: The 2005-2020 NYS hospital discharge database was queried for patients aged 12-65 years with firearm-related hospital encounters. Patient and environmental variables were extracted. Patient home zip code was used to determine the Social Deprivation Index (SDI) for each patient's area of residence. We conducted bivariate and multivariate analyses among patients who suffered a single incident of gun violence or gun violence revictimization. RESULTS: We identified 38,974 gun violence victims among whom 2,243 (5.8%) suffered revictimization. The proportion of revictimization rose from 4% in 2008 to 8% in 2020 (p < 0.01). The median [IQR] time from first to second incident among those who suffered revictimization was 359 [81-1,167] days. Revictimization was more common among Blacks (75.0% vs 65.1%, p < 0.01), patients with Medicaid (54.9% vs 43.2%, p < 0.01), and in areas of higher deprivation (84.8 percentile vs 82.1 percentile, p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Gun violence revictimization is on the rise. People of color and those residing in areas with high social deprivation are more likely to be re-injured. Our findings emphasize the importance of community-level over individual-level interventions for prevention of gun violence revictimization. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Epidemiological, Level III.

How I GPT It: Development of Custom Artificial Intelligence (AI) Chatbots for Surgical Education.

Artificial Intelligence (AI) chatbots provide a novel format for individuals to interact with large language models (LLMs). Recently released tools allow nontechnical users to develop chatbots using natural language. Surgical education is an exciting area in which chatbots developed in this manner may be rapidly deployed, though additional work will be required to ensure their accuracy and safety. In this paper, we outline our initial experience with AI chatbot creation in surgical education and offer considerations for future use of this technology.

Challenging Dogma by Skipping the Emergency Department Thoracotomy: A Propensity Score Matched Analysis of the Trauma Quality Improvement Database.

INTRODUCTION: Survival following emergency department thoracotomy (EDT) for patients in extremis is poor. Whether intervention in the operating room instead of EDT in select patients could lead to improved outcomes is unknown. We hypothesized that patients who underwent intervention in the operating room would have improved outcomes compared to those who underwent EDT. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of the Trauma Quality Improvement Program database from 2017 to 2021. All adult patients who underwent EDT, operating room thoracotomy (ORT), or sternotomy as the first form of surgical intervention within 1 h of arrival were included. Of patients without prehospital cardiac arrest, propensity score matching was utilized to create three comparable groups. The primary outcome was survival. Secondary outcomes included time to procedure. RESULTS: There were 1865 EDT patients, 835 ORT patients, and 456 sternotomy patients who met the inclusion criteria. There were 349 EDT, 344 ORT, and 408 sternotomy patients in the matched analysis. On Cox multivariate regression, there was an increased risk of mortality with EDT versus sternotomy (HR 4.64, P < 0.0001), EDT versus ORT (HR 1.65, P < 0.0001), and ORT versus sternotomy (HR 2.81, P < 0.0001). Time to procedure was shorter with EDT versus sternotomy (22 min versus 34 min, P < 0.0001) and versus ORT (22 min versus 37 min, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: There was an association between sternotomy and ORT versus EDT and improved mortality. In select patients, operative approaches rather than the traditional EDT could be considered.

Utility of intracranial pressure monitoring in patients with traumatic brain injuries: a propensity score matching analysis of TQIP data.

PURPOSE: Intracranial pressure monitoring (ICPM) is central to traumatic brain injury (TBI) management, but its utility is controversial. METHODS: The 2016-2017 TQIP database was queried for isolated TBI. Patients with ICPM [(ICPM (+)] were propensity-score matched (PSM) to those without ICPM [ICPM (-)] and divided into three age groups by years (< 18, 18-54, ≥  55). RESULTS: PSM yielded 2125 patients in each group. Patients aged < 18 years had a higher survival probability (p = 0.013) and decreased mortality (p = 0.016) in the ICPM (+) group. Complications were higher and LOS was longer in ICPM (+) patients aged 18-54 years and ≥ 55 years, but not in patients aged < 18 years. CONCLUSIONS: ICPM (+) is associated with a survival benefit without an increase in complications in patents aged < 18 years. In patients aged ≥ 18 years, ICPM (+) is associated with more complications and longer LOS without a survival benefit.

Transfusion futility thresholds and mortality in geriatric trauma: Does frailty matter?

BACKGROUND: Data on massive transfusion (MT) in geriatric trauma patients is lacking. This study aims to determine geriatric transfusion futility thresholds (TT) and TT variations based on frailty. METHODS: Patients from 2013 to 2018 TQIP database receiving MT were stratified by age and frailty. TTs and outcomes were compared between geriatric and younger adults and among geriatric adults based on frailty status. RESULTS: The TT was lower for geriatric than younger adults (34 vs 39 units; p â€‹= â€‹0.03). There was no difference in TT between the non-frail, frail, and severely frail geriatric adults (37, 30 and 25 units, respectively, p â€‹> â€‹0.05). Geriatric adults had higher mortality than younger adults (63.1% vs 45.8%, p < 0.01). Non-frail geriatric adults had the highest mortality (69.4% vs 56.5% vs 56.2%, p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Geriatric patients have a lower TT than younger adults, irrespective of frailty. This may help improve outcomes and optimize MT utilization.

Perceptions of Competition-Based Learning After a Brief Experience at a National Surgical Meeting.

BACKGROUND: Competition-based learning (CBL) facilitates learning through competitions. At the 2022 & 2023 Annual SAGES meetings, we evaluated a CBL experience (TOP GUN Shootout) developed from a modified version of the previously validated TOP GUN Laparoscopic Skills and Suturing Program. The project sought to evaluate the TOP GUN Shootout's (TGS) ability to enhance participant engagement in pursuit of laparoscopic surgical skills. METHODS: Participants competed in the TGS. Their scores (time and errors) were recorded for: Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery Peg Pass, Cup Drop Task, and Intracorporeal Suturing. All participants completed a 10-question satisfaction survey on a 7-point Likert scale, with questions assessing 3 domains: (1) capability/confidence in MIS skill performance prior to the competition; (2) applicability and satisfaction with TGS's capacity to develop MIS skills; and (3) interest in seeking additional MIS training and appropriateness of CBL in MIS training. Descriptive statistics were used to evaluate these areas. RESULTS: Overall, 121 participants completed the TGS, of whom 84 (69%) completed the satisfaction survey. The average age was 32.9 years, 67% were males. On average (+/- SD), participant satisfaction was 5.04 (+/- 2.08) for Domain 1, 6.20 (+/- 1.28) for Domain 2, and 6.58 (+/- .95) for Domain 3. CONCLUSION: Participants described an overall lack of confidence in their MIS skills prior to the 2022-2023 Annual SAGES conference. Participants felt that this brief CBL experience, aided in the development of their MIS skills. Furthermore, this brief CBL experience may inspire learners to seek out further training of their MIS skills.

Thriving as a Surgical Intern: Three Tips From the Collaboration of Surgical Education Fellows (CoSEF).

We are the multi-institutional organization known as the Collaboration of Surgical Education Fellows (CoSEF). We've collectively reflected on our range of experiences across the country and identified 3 principles which promote a successful intern experience: (1) Own your patients; (2) Treat people like people; and (3) Take care of yourself.

Strategies for appropriate positioning and repositioning the Avalon ECMO cannula in a 17-year-old with left hepatic vein malposition.

INTRODUCTION: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is a well-recognized therapy in children with refractory hypoxia. Different cannulas have been used with reported complications with placement, such as cardiac perforation, and multiple reports focusing on avoiding this. However, strategies to avoid hepatic vein cannulation and reposition when it occurs are not well described. CASE REPORT: Here, we report a case where a 27-Fr Avalon bicaval double lumen cannula in the left hepatic vein was successfully repositioning using serial chest X-rays (CXR) and transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) in a 17-year-old female. DISCUSSION: While venovenous (VV) ECMO is preferred by many, placement of the Avalon catheter, a cannula available for VV ECMO, may be challenging due to migration or positioning issues. Specific techniques of wire and catheter advancement as well as confirming wire position in the infra-hepatic inferior vena cava can help ensure appropriate positioning while avoiding hepatic vein cannulation and enabling successful repositioning when it occurs. CONCLUSION: Wire position in the infra-hepatic inferior vena cava helps ensure safe and appropriate Avalon cannula position and placement. The Avalon cannula can be successfully repositioned from the left hepatic vein by retracting the cannula, reinserting the wire and introducer together, and then manipulation techniques using serial CXR and TTE.

Syringomatous Tumor of the Nipple.

Syringomatous tumor of the nipple (SyT), previously known as syringomatous adenoma of the nipple (SAN) was originally described in 1983 as a rare benign tumor of the sweat duct. It is a rare benign tumor arising from the skin adnexal eccrine glands that can be misdiagnosed as invasive carcinoma due to its infiltrative nature, resulting in overtreatment. We report clinical, histopathologic, and surgical findings of a case of infiltrating syringomatous adenoma in a 40-year-old female as well as a literature review of previous cases. A high index of suspicion is required to make the diagnosis of SyT and prevent overtreatment.

Severe Pancreatitis Multidisciplinary Working Group: Exploratory Analysis to Optimize Care and Cost.

INTRODUCTION: The minimally invasive step-up approach to pancreatitis improves outcomes. Multidisciplinary working groups may best facilitate this approach. However, support for these working groups requires funding. We hypothesize that patients requiring surgical debridement generate sufficient revenue to sustain these working groups. Furthermore, patients selected for surgical debridement by the working group will have a higher rate of percutaneous and endoscopic intervention in adherence to the step-up approach. METHODS: We conducted an observational cohort study of all patients with severe acute and/or necrotizing pancreatitis whose care was overseen by our multidisciplinary working group (October 2015 through January 2019). Patient demographics, hospital treatments, and outcomes data were compared between those who underwent surgical debridement and those who did not. Hospital billing data were also collected from those who are undergoing surgical debridement and compared to institutional benchmarks for financial sustainability. RESULTS: A total of 108 patients received care overseen by the working group, 10 of which progressed to surgical debridement. The mean contribution margin percentages for each patient in the surgical debridement group were higher than the threshold value for financial sustainability, 39% (60.34% ± 16.66%; P = 0.004). Patients in the surgical debridement group were more likely to undergo intervention by interventional radiologist (odds ratio, 1.58; P = 0.005). The mortality was higher in the nonsurgical debridement group (odds ratio, 15; P = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: Our multidisciplinary working group delivered step-up care to patients with pancreatitis. Patients requiring surgical debridement generated a significantly positive contribution margin that could be used to help support the costs associated with providing multidisciplinary care.

Surgery Acting Internship Individual Learning Plans: Fostering Mentorship in the COVID-19 Era.

OBJECTIVE: Mentorship facilitates successful matching for surgical specialties. A formal mentorship plan may counteract restricted mentorship opportunities due to the COVID-19 pandemic. DESIGN: We surveyed medical students applying to surgery specialties who participated in our formalized mentorship program (MF) and those of a prior cohort who were informally mentored (MI). Epistemic Network Analysis was used to model qualitative responses. SETTING: University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health. PARTICIPANTS: Fourth-year medical students who matched into ACGME-accredited surgical specialties. RESULTS: MF students (n = 12) met with their mentors more frequently than MI students (n = 13; p = 0.03). Both groups received career guidance, letters of recommendation and application preparation. However, the MI cohort reported greater psychological and emotional support whereas the MF cohort reported more assistance with skills development. CONCLUSIONS: A formalized mentorship program fostered successful mentoring relationships despite limitations from the COVID-19 pandemic.

Simulation-Based Medical Education: Development of an Assessment Tool for Novice Use.

BACKGROUND: Simulation-based medical education, an educational model in which students engage in simulated patient scenarios, improves performance. However, assessment tools including the Oxford Non-Technical Skills (NOTECHS) scale require expert assessors. We modified this tool for novice use. METHODS: Medical students participated in 5 nontechnical simulations. The NOTECHS scale was modified to allow for novice evaluation. Three novices and 2 experts assessed performance, with intraclass correlation used to assess validity. RESULTS: Twenty-two learners participated in the simulations. Novice reviewers had moderate to excellent correlation among evaluations (0.66 < intraclass correlation coefficients [ICC] < 0.95). Novice and expert reviewers had moderate to good correlation among evaluations (0.51 < ICC < 0.88). DISCUSSION: The modified NOTECHS scales can be utilized by novices to evaluate simulation performance. Novice assessment correlates with expert review. These tools may encourage the use of simulation-based medical education.