Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc ; 64(4): 977-987, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27767963

ABSTRACT

Rheopheresis is an extracorporal selective double-filtration procedure. In the first part of the treatment the blood is passes through the plasma filter, which separates blood cells from the plasma. Then the plasma flow to a second filter called MONET (Membranefiltration Optimised Novel Extracorporal Treatment). The MONET filter retains high molecular weight proteins such LDL, Lp(a), fibrinogen, α2 macroglobulin, vWF and IgM. Hereby the whole blood and plasma viscosity decrease, improves microcirculation, and has a positive effect on lipid profile as well.Accorging to ASFA recommendation rheopheresis is a first line treatment in age-related dry macular degeneration and in sudden sensorineural hearing loss. There are other clinical situations in which rheopheresis has been used effectivly. But only few data are available and large clinical trials have not been done in these diseases. In this paper we describe a case history and laboratory findings of a patient who suffers from age related dry macular degeneration and was successfully treated by rheopheresis.


Subject(s)
Hemorheology , Macular Degeneration/etiology , Vascular Diseases/blood , Blood Component Removal/methods , Humans
2.
Eur J Ophthalmol ; 24(5): 676-81, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24474379

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To assess astigmatism induced by paired opposite clear corneal incision (OCCI) compared to single incisions and to investigate factors on which its effect depends. METHODS: The study comprised 326 eyes from 326 patients. In patients with <1.0 D corneal astigmatism, clear corneal incision was performed (CC group, n = 245), and in those with >1.0 D preoperative corneal astigmatism, a second, opposite clear corneal incision was made (OCCI group, n = 81). Both groups consisted of superior, temporal, and oblique subgroups according to the steepest meridian. Prior to the surgery, and after surgery, repeated keratometry was performed and surgically induced astigmatism (SIA) was calculated using vector analysis. RESULTS: Two weeks after the surgery, the SIA was 0.67 ± 0.44 D in the CC group and 1.15 ± 0.65 D in the OCCI group; 9 weeks after the operation, it was 0.61 ± 0.43 D in the CC group and 0.99 ± 0.57 D in the OCCI group (p<0.001). The SIA showed no significant postoperative change in our groups. CONCLUSIONS: Opposite clear corneal incision reliably induces about 1.0 D of corneal astigmatism on the steep meridian in proportion to the rate of preoperative astigmatism. Its magnitude is independent of the location of the incisions and its effect remains unchanged during the postoperative period.


Subject(s)
Astigmatism/etiology , Cornea/surgery , Intraoperative Complications , Lens Implantation, Intraocular , Phacoemulsification/methods , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Astigmatism/physiopathology , Cornea/physiopathology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Postoperative Period , Prospective Studies , Refraction, Ocular/physiology , Time Factors , Visual Acuity/physiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...