Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
BMJ Open ; 12(11): e065952, 2022 11 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36418118

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Cervical cancer (CC) causes thousands of deaths each year. Nearly 100% of cases are caused by oncogenic strains of human papillomavirus (HPV). In most industrialised countries, CC screening (CCS) is based on the detection of HPV infections. For many reasons including lower adherence to CCS, underserved women are more likely to develop CC, and die from it. We aim to demonstrate that the use of incentives could improve screening rates among this population. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Our cluster randomised, controlled trial will include 10 000 women aged 30-65 years eligible for CCS, living in deprived areas in four French departments, two mainlands and two overseas, and who did not perform physician-based HPV testing within the framework of the nationally organised screening programme. HPV self-sampling kit (HPVss) will be mailed to them. Two interventions are combined in a factorial analysis design ending in four arms: the possibility to receive or not a financial incentive of €20 and to send back the self-sampling by mail or to give it to a health professional, family doctor, gynaecologist, midwife or pharmacist. The main outcome is the proportion of women returning the HPVss, or doing a physician-based HPV or pap-smear test the year after receiving the HPVss. 12-month follow-up data will be collected through the French National Health Insurance database. We expect to increase the return rate of HPV self-samples by at least 10% (from 20% to 30%) compared with the postal return without economic incentive. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval was first obtained on 2 April 2020, then on July 29 2022. The ethics committee classified the study as interventional with low risk, thus no formal consent is required for inclusion. The use of health insurance data was approved by the Commission Nationale Informatique et Libertés on 14 September 2021 (ref No 920276). An independent data security and monitoring committee was established. The main trial results will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04312178.


Subject(s)
Alphapapillomavirus , Papillomavirus Infections , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms , Humans , Female , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/diagnosis , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/prevention & control , Early Detection of Cancer/methods , Papillomavirus Infections/diagnosis , Motivation , Papillomaviridae , Primary Health Care , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
2.
J Clin Virol ; 78: 102-7, 2016 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27015435

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: HPV vaginal self-sampling can be an alternative for women refusing cytological screening. OBJECTIVES: To describe HR-HPV types in 35-69 years old women from low socioeconomic groups not attending regular cytological screening in Marseille, France. STUDY DESIGN: A cervical screening campaign using HR-HPV self-sampling including 22,702 women aged 35-69 years living in low socioeconomic districts of Marseille was organized. A cytological and/or histological follow-up was undertaken for a subset of women harboring HR-HPV types. Abbott RealTime High Risk HPV test was used for screening, while INNO-LiPA HPV Genotyping Extra assay was used for genotyping. RESULTS: 4245 self-samplings were performed (participation rate, 18.7%) out of which 609 (14.3%) were HR-HPV+ by the screening test including 114HPV 16 (18.7%), 41HPV 18 (6.7%), 454HR-HPVnon-16/18 (75.4%). A sample of 260 out of the 454HR-HPVnon-16/18 were genotyped by INNO-LiPA which revealed HPV52 (35%), 66 (22.6%), 51 (19.6%), 31 (15.7%), 39 (13%), 56 (10.4%), and 53, 35, 59, 33, 58, 82, 45, 68, 73 (<10% each). At month 12, a 2nd self-collection kit was sent to 274 of 609HR-HPV+ women who did not have a Pap-test previously performed on them. Of these 274 women, 130 provided a sample for HPV testing; one was uninterpretable, 56 were HPV negative, and 73 were HR-HPV+ (10HPV16+, 3HPV18+, 60HR-HPVnon-16/18+). Of the 345 women with cytological and/or histological follow-up 19 (5.5%) had ≥CIN2 lesions, (11 were HPV16+ and 8 were HR-HPVnon-16/18). CONCLUSION: This study illustrates the potential efficacy of self-sampling as a cancer screening strategy for socioeconomically deprived women who do not participate in regular Pap screening programs.


Subject(s)
Genotype , Papillomaviridae/classification , Papillomaviridae/isolation & purification , Papillomavirus Infections/epidemiology , Papillomavirus Infections/virology , Self Administration , Specimen Handling/methods , Adult , Aged , Female , France/epidemiology , Humans , Middle Aged , Papillomaviridae/genetics , Papillomavirus Infections/diagnosis , Social Class , Vagina/virology
3.
Bull Cancer ; 98(7): 723-31, 2011 Jul.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21700548

ABSTRACT

The non-participation to cervical screening is the major determinant in the risk of mortality due to cervical cancer. In France, around 40% of women do not participate to regular screening. The cultural or economic barriers for performing screening by Pap test are numerous; one of the most frequent is the refusal of gynaecological examination. A persistent HPV(HR) infection is a necessary factor for developing cervical cancer. The HPV(HR) testing has a high sensibility to detect high grade cervical intra-epithelial neoplasia (CIN 2-3) and a satisfactory specificity after 30-35 years old. The principal objective of this study was to compare the participation rates in women 35-69 years old who did not perform a Pap test after a first individual invitation, either when an HPV(HR) auto-test was offered to be performed at home or a second invitation to Pap test was sent. We also evaluated the quality of the two tests, the positive results obtained by age groups and the following histological type of lesions diagnosed in the women with positive results. The study included 9,334 women, 35-69 years old, who did not realized a Pap-test during the 2 previous years and who did not respond at a first individual invitation. These non-responders were randomized into two groups: one group (n=4,934) received a second individual invitation and the other (n=4,400) an offer of receiving and performing an HPV auto-test at home. In women 35-69 years the participation to the second invitation to Pap test was significantly lower (7.2%) than the participation to auto-test (26.4%) with P<0.001. The quality of the two tests was satisfactory; the auto-test was not altered by the postage to laboratory (non interpretable rate=1.4% [CI at 95%=0.65%; 2.15%]. From the 311 Pap tests done, 5.5% (17) were classified "abnormal" (nine ASCUS, one high grade and seven low grades). The follow up of 13 women out of 17 confirmed the diagnosis for 1 case of CIN2 and 2 cases of CIN3, 4 women are lost of follow up after 6 months. From the 939 HPV(HR) tests done, 6.2% (58) were positive. Such positivity rate was not influenced by age. Out of the 58 positive HPV(HR) cases, 27 only were of the 16 genotype (46.5% [CI 95%=33.7%; 59.3%]). This law rate is a consequence of an inversion of the ratio HPV 16 versus other types in women 60 years old and over. In this group, the follow-up of 36 women diagnosed five cases of CIN1, one of CIN2 and four of CIN3; 22 patients are lost of follow up at 6 months. Globally, in the studied population, an individual recall for pap test allowed to diagnose and treat 3 high grade lesions (7‰) and the dispatching of an auto test allowed the diagnosis and treatment of five high grade lesions (1,4‰), this difference is significant (P=0.02; OR=0.25 [0.05; 0.97]). The HPV(HR) auto-test seems to be better accepted than the Pap test in the 35-69 years old women previously non-responders to individual invitation, and the quality of the test is satisfactory. Such a test can be proposed to the 35-69 years old non-participant to Pap test to increase the coverage for cervical screening, if the rates of diagnostic examinations performed in case of an HPV(HR) positive is sufficiently high.


Subject(s)
Papillomavirus Infections/diagnosis , Refusal to Participate/statistics & numerical data , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/diagnosis , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/diagnosis , Vaginal Smears/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Aged , Diagnostic Self Evaluation , Female , France , Humans , Middle Aged , Pilot Projects , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/virology , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/virology
4.
J Med Virol ; 82(8): 1431-7, 2010 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20572091

ABSTRACT

Self-sampling using vaginal swabs could be a valuable alternative to screen for cervical cancer for women who do not attend regular cytological screening. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of high and low-risk HPV types and of HPV type 16 and 18 DNA load in self-collected vaginal swabs from 35- to 69-year-old Southern French women of low socioeconomic level or migrant populations who do not attend regular cervical screening. A good concordance (93.1%) was found between cervical brush and vaginal swabs in 29 samples. Self-collected vaginal swabs were examined from 120 women. HPV infection was found in 28 women (23.3%; median age 48 years), 17 (14.1%) of whom harbored high-risk HPV types. HPV type 16 was the high risk type found most frequently, followed by types 53, 31, 18, 58, and 66. The low-risk type detected most frequently was HPV type 6, followed by types 61, 70, and 81. The mean HPV 16 and 18 load was 6.3 log(10) copies/10(6) cells and 2.4 log(10) copies/10(6) cells, respectively. These results suggest that vaginal self-swabs can be a reliable tool for cervical cancer screening in non-attending and inadequately screened elderly women.


Subject(s)
Human papillomavirus 16/isolation & purification , Human papillomavirus 18/isolation & purification , Mass Screening/methods , Papillomavirus Infections/diagnosis , Papillomavirus Infections/epidemiology , Self Administration , Vagina/virology , Adult , Aged , Female , France/epidemiology , Humans , Middle Aged , Papillomavirus Infections/virology , Prevalence , Viral Load
5.
Bull Cancer ; 94(5): 461-7, 2007 May.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17535784

ABSTRACT

Individual cervical screening with pap-smears is the major cause of the decrease in incidence and mortality of cervical cancer in France since more than 30 years. But, for the last ten years, the decrease in mortality is limited due to the persistence of poor prognostic cases and the insufficiency of treatment efficacy in such patients. These cases are mostly observed in women who did not participate to regular screening. They are generally from low socioeconomic levels or migrant populations, or both. Such an observation leads us to organize 3 successive pilot campaigns (2001, 2003, 2005) in the Northern part of Marseille city where the rate of such poor population is high (37 to 45%). The women without a pap-smear indexed in the National Insurance Register for the last 3-2 years were invited by individual mailing to perform, free of charge, a pap-smear. The evaluation of each campaign helps us to improve the next one. The major changes from the 1st one to the 3rd one were to increase the number of free screening services, to send a second invitation to the non responders, and to organize local meetings with social workers and nurses to explain to the women the importance of performing regular screening tests. The final results after the 3 campaigns showed : out of the eligible women the participation rates are dramatically low evolving from 1,56 % to 2,48% and 6,87% of pap-smears done along the 3 campaigns ; the selection of women "without pap-smear" from the national Insurance register was not good, a great number of missing data was identified, explaining partly the extremely low rate of participation ; the factors increasing a little the participation are the second mailing of invitation (39 % of pap-smears realised) ; the total gratuitous of the screening (both sampling and reading) ; the oral information delivered locally by social workers and the proximity of the places to perform the test ; the quality of the pap-smears collected by gynecologists was good but insufficient for other health professionals, requiring a specific training for cervical cell collection. The organization of such pilot projects need to be followed to find better solutions to increase the participation to cervical screening of such populations who are at high risk of poor prognosis cervical cancers.


Subject(s)
Mass Screening/organization & administration , Poverty , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/epidemiology , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/prevention & control , Adult , Aged , Female , France/epidemiology , Humans , Mass Media , Middle Aged , Papanicolaou Test , Registries , Socioeconomic Factors , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/pathology , Vaginal Smears
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...