Meta-review on the efficacy of psychological therapies for the treatment of substance use disorders.

This meta-review aimed to summarize the current state of knowledge provided by meta-analyzes on the efficacy of psychotherapies for substance use disorders. A systematic search was performed in PubMed, PsycINFO, Web of Science and Google Scholar. Meta-analyzes were included if they quantitatively examined the efficacy of a psychotherapy on substance use. Among the 6866 potential articles that were screened for eligibility, 23 meta-analyzes were eligible (78 effect sizes). Each meta-analysis included 2-156 studies, with samples ranging between approximately 130 to over 33,000 individuals. The quality of evidence was evaluated as being globally of low to moderate quality. Substances were categorized as: alcohol (k = 12), cannabis (k = 7), stimulants (k = 4), opioids (k = 3) and benzodiazepines (k = 1). Interventions comprised brief intervention, cognitive-behavioral therapy, contingency management, voucher-based reinforcement therapy, motivational interview, motivational enhancement therapy, significant other people involved in the treatment, and cue-expose therapy. Concerning solely significant results, small benefits were observed for significant other people involved in treatment, motivational interviewing, and the combination of cognitive-behavioral therapy with motivational interviewing for alcohol use disorder. Likewise, small-to-moderate effects were found for motivational approaches, and cognitive-behavioral therapy as well as the combination of cognitive-behavioral therapy and motivational enhancement therapy in the case of cannabis use disorder. Small effects were observed for contingency management as well as cognitive behavioral-therapy for amphetamine-type use disorder. Small effects were similarly found for contingency management for cocaine use disorder. Concerning opioid use disorder, moderate effects were observed for contingency management and voucher-based reinforcement intervention. For benzodiazepine use disorder, small effects were noted for cognitive-behavioral therapy with taper. Results often displayed small to moderate heterogeneity when reported and were generally compared to inactive controls, such as treatment-as-usual. In all, the psychosocial treatments for substance use disorders included in this meta-review have shown to be at best moderately effective over inactive controls in the short term. Nevertheless, further trials are needed as well as meta-analyzes on interventions not included in this meta-review.

The impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on treatment-resistant schizophrenia patients having followed virtual reality therapy or cognitive behavioural therapy: a content analysis.

PURPOSE: The COVID-19 pandemic led to exacerbation of mental health symptoms and deterioration in psychological well-being in individuals suffering from schizophrenia. The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on patients suffering from treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS) with auditory verbal hallucinations (AVH) having undergone virtual reality therapy (VRT) or cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) on their symptomatology. The secondary objective is to identify the differences and similarities in relation to the response to the COVID 19 pandemic between these two groups of patients. METHODS: Qualitative analysis of semi-structured interviews was conducted with 42 patients suffering from TRS who had previously followed VRT or CBT. All interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analysed. RESULTS: Four themes emerged in this study: Psychotherapeutic Interventions, Impact of COVID-19 and Public health and safety policies, Substance use and Psychiatric follow-up. Participants from both groups reported that their therapy was beneficial in controlling AVH. Patients having followed CBT reported more depressive symptoms whereas patients having followed VRT reported more anxious symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: This study offers a first qualitative insight in patients suffering from TRS and the impacts of COVID-19 on them and opens the door to the protective factors of CBT and VRT for this specific population.

A systematic review of relational-based therapies for the treatment of auditory hallucinations in patients with psychotic disorders.

BACKGROUND: Auditory hallucinations in patients with psychotic disorders may be very distressing. Unfortunately, a large proportion of individuals are resistant to pharmacological interventions and the gold-standard cognitive-behavioral therapy for psychosis offers at best modest effects. To improve therapeutic outcomes, several therapies have been created to establish a relationship between voice-hearers and their voices. With increasing literature, we conducted a systematic review of dialogical therapies and examined the evidence behind their efficacy. METHODS: A systematic search was performed in PubMed, PsycINFO, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. Articles were included if they discussed the effects of dialogical interventions for patients with psychotic disorders. RESULTS: A total of 17 studies were included within this systematic review. Cumulative evidence from various therapies has shown that entering in a dialog with voices is beneficial to patients, even those who are resistant to current pharmacological treatments. Heightened benefits have been mainly observed with Relating Therapy and Avatar Therapy/Virtual Reality assisted Therapy, with evidence generally of moderate quality. Both these interventions have shown large to very large effects on voices and voice-related distress as well as moderate to large magnitude improvements on affective symptoms. Though, cognitive-behavioral therapy for command hallucinations and making sense of voices noted no improvements on voices. CONCLUSIONS: Literature on relational-based interventions with a strong emphasis on the relational aspects of voice hearing has shown positive effects. Results suggest that these dialogical therapies might surpass the efficacy of current gold-standard approaches.

A scoping review of malnutrition in patients undergoing interventions for peripheral arterial disease.

BACKGROUND: Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is associated with comorbid conditions and frailty. The role of preoperative nutrition in patients with PAD has not been well characterized. In the present scoping review, we sought to describe the prevalence and prognostic implications of preoperative malnutrition in patients undergoing vascular interventions for claudication or chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI). METHODS: We systematically searched for studies across six databases from inception to August 2021. Studies that had focused on patients with claudication or CLTI who had undergone open or endovascular procedures were included if preoperative nutrition had been measured and correlated with a clinical outcome. RESULTS: Of 4186 records identified, 24 studies had addressed the prevalence or prognostic effects of malnutrition in patients who had undergone interventions for PAD. The proportion of women included in these studies ranged from 6% to 58%. The prevalence of preoperative malnutrition ranged from 14.6% to 72%. Seven different malnutrition assessments had been used in these studies. Across all the scales, preoperative malnutrition was associated with at least one of the following outcomes: mortality, postoperative complications, length of stay, readmission rates, and delayed wound healing. CONCLUSIONS: A variety of tools were used to measure malnutrition in patients undergoing interventions for PAD. Our findings suggest that preoperative malnutrition is associated with adverse clinical outcomes for patients undergoing open and endovascular procedures for claudication or CLTI and that consensus is lacking regarding which tool to use. Clinicians and surgeons should be sensitized to the importance of assessing for malnutrition preoperatively in adults undergoing interventions for PAD.

Systematic Review on the Mental Health and Treatment Impacts of COVID-19 on Neurocognitive Disorders.

Objectives. The COVID-19 pandemic has had many public health impacts, especially on vulnerable individuals including adults with neurocognitive disorders (NCD). With increasing literature, this systematic literature review aimed to address the mental health effects of COVID-19 on people with NCD in addition to examine the impact of the pandemic on treatments/resources for NCD. Methods. A literature search was conducted in the electronic databases of PubMed, PsycINFO, Web of Science and Google Scholar. Studies were included so long as they assessed the mental health or therapeutic effects of COVID-19 on NCD. Results. Among the retrieved articles, 59 met eligibility criteria. First, the pandemic and resulting self-isolation led to many detrimental effects on psychological well-being. Exacerbation and relapses of neurocognitive and behavioral symptoms were observed, as well as emergences of new psychological symptoms (i.e., depression, anxiety). Second, therapeutic and community services for individuals suffering from NCD, such as social support services and outpatient clinics, were disrupted or reduced leading to postponed appointments and evaluations, as well as reduced access to medications. These issues were somewhat palliated with the growth of telemedicine. Conclusions. This systematic review highlights the extent of the effects of the pandemic, and the topics addressed should be taken into consideration by healthcare practitioners, institutions, and policymakers to ensure that proper measures are employed to protect this population from additional harm.