Analysis of ophthalmological and vision-related publications in Latin America.

PURPOSE: To assess scientific production related to ophthalmology and vision in Latin America during the period from 2006 to 2015. METHODS: The PubMed, Lilacs (Bireme), Google Scholar, SciELO, and Medigraphic databases were evaluated for this retrospective, descriptive, and comparative study. RESULTS: A total of 1,510 articles was identified. Brazil was the leader in quantitative production in ophthalmology, averaging 85.4 articles per year. Mexico was in second place with 27.4, and Argentina was in third place with 11.1 articles per year. Forty-one percent of articles were published in English, 28.1% dealt with the subspecialty of the retina, and 63% were published by researchers affiliated with universities. The frequency of male first authors was 58.9%, and the journal Arquivos Brasileiros de Oftalmologia accounted for 36.42% of the identified articles. CONCLUSIONS: Brazil stands in first place in Latin America in ophthalmologic scientific production. Nearly half of the researchers in ophthalmology in Latin America included in our study were listed in databases other than PubMed.

Analysis of ophthalmological and vision-related publications in Latin America / Análise de publicações oftalmológicas e relacionadas à visão na América Latina

ABSTRACT Purpose: To assess scientific production related to ophthalmology and vision in Latin America during the period from 2006 to 2015. Methods: The PubMed, Lilacs (Bireme), Google Scholar, SciELO, and Medigraphic databases were evaluated for this retrospective, descriptive, and comparative study. Results: A total of 1,510 articles was identified. Brazil was the leader in quantitative production in ophthalmology, averaging 85.4 articles per year. Mexico was in second place with 27.4, and Argentina was in third place with 11.1 articles per year. Forty-one percent of articles were published in English, 28.1% dealt with the subspecialty of the retina, and 63% were published by researchers affiliated with universities. The frequency of male first authors was 58.9%, and the journal Arquivos Brasileiros de Oftalmologia accounted for 36.42% of the identified articles. Conclusions: Brazil stands in first place in Latin America in ophthalmologic scientific production. Nearly half of the researchers in ophthalmology in Latin America included in our study were listed in databases other than PubMed.

RESUMO Objetivo: Avaliar a produção científica relacionada à oftalmologia e à visão na América Latina durante o período de 2006 a 2015. Métodos: As bases de dados PubMed, Lilacs (Bireme), Google Scholar, SciELO e Medigraphic foram utilizadas para realizar um estudo retrospectivo, descritivo e comparativo. Resultados: Foram identificados 1,510 artigos, sendo que o Brasil foi a principal fonte de produção quantitativa, com uma média de 85,4 artigos por ano; o México aparece em segundo lugar com 27,4 e a Argentina em terceiro lugar com 11,1 artigos por ano. Quarenta e um por cento dos artigos foram publicados em inglês; 28,1% trataram da subespecialidade da retina; e a principal fonte institucional de publicações foram as universidades, com 63%. A frequência de primeiros autores do sexo masculino foi de 58,9%, e a revista Arquivos Brasileiros de Oftalmologia representou 36,42% dos artigos identificados. Conclusões: O Brasil ocupa o primeiro lugar na América Latina na produção científica oftalmológica. Os bancos de dados não indexados no PubMed foram incluídos em nosso estudo, representam quase metade dos pesquisadores em oftalmologia na América Latina.

The Challenge of Universal Eye Health in Latin America: distributive inequality of ophthalmologists in 14 countries.

BACKGROUND: No comprehensive study currently exists on the supply of ophthalmologists across Latin America. We explored sociogeographic inequalities in the availability and distribution of ophthalmologists across 14 Latin American countries. METHODS: The National Ophthalmologic Societies of Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Colombia, Costa Rica, Chile, the Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Guatemala, Mexico, Paraguay, Peru, Uruguay and Venezuela provided data on affiliated ophthalmologists by first-order subnational divisions in 2013. Human Development Index (HDI) estimates at the corresponding subnational division were used as equity stratifiers. Distributional inequality of ophthalmologists within each country was assessed by the health concentration index (HCI) and the index of dissimilarity (ID), along with the mean level of ophthalmologists per population. RESULTS: Across all countries studied, there were 5.2 ophthalmologists per 100 000 population on average (95% CI 5.0 to 5.4) in 2013, with a mean HCI of 0.26 (0.16 to 0.37) and a mean relative ID of 22.7% (20.9% to 24.7%). There was wide inequality in ophthalmologist availability between countries, ranging from 1.2 (1.1 to 1.4) in Ecuador to 8.6 (8.5 to 8.8) in Brazil. All countries had positive (ie, pro-rich) HCI values ranging from 0.68 (0.66 to 0.71) in Guatemala to 0.02 (-0.11 to 0.14) in Venezuela. Correspondingly, redistributive potential to achieve equity was closest in Venezuela (ID: 1.5%) and farthest in Guatemala (ID: 60.3%). Benchmarked against regional averages, most countries had a lower availability of ophthalmologists and higher relative inequality. CONCLUSIONS: There is high inequality in the level and distribution of ophthalmologists between and within countries in Latin America, with a disproportionate number concentrated in more developed, socially advantaged areas. More equitable access to ophthalmologists could be achieved by implementing incentivised human resources redistribution programmes and by improving the social determinants of health in underserved areas.