Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Transplant Proc ; 52(2): 534-536, 2020 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32081355

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To analyze predictors of survival involved in liver retransplantation (LRT), including the Rosen Model (RM). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a descriptive, observational, and unicentric study based on predictors of survival including patients who underwent LRT in a tertiary medical center between April 2002 and December 2018. Recipient, donor, and transplant data were collected, and RM score was calculated for every patient. Fisher exact test and Student t test were used for qualitative and quantitative variables, respectively. The Shapiro-Wilks test was applied to verify the normality of the sample. Survival differences between subgroups were checked using the log-rank test. Statistical significance was stated at P < .05. RESULTS: Among 32 retransplanted patients in this period, 17 (53.1%) survived more than 12 months after LRT. The results of statistical associations between prognostic factors and overall survival highlighted that an older recipient age was significantly correlated with a lower overall survival. The 3-month overall survival was 84.3%. Nineteen patients had a low risk according to RM, with a 3-month survival rate of 78.9%. Eight had a RM intermediate risk, with a survival rate of 21%. Despite the aforementioned data, the log-rank test did not find statistical differences in survival (P = .488). CONCLUSION: We should consider older recipient age as a negative prognostic factor of overall survival. Also, we should contemplate intermediate risk according to RM as an adverse predictor regarding survival in LRT. Both data are of interest regarding the indication or not of LRT and prioritization on the waiting list.


Subject(s)
Liver Transplantation/mortality , Patient Selection , Reoperation/mortality , Waiting Lists/mortality , Adult , Female , Humans , Liver Transplantation/methods , Male , Middle Aged , Reoperation/methods , Survival Rate
2.
Transplant Proc ; 52(2): 543-545, 2020 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32085861

ABSTRACT

AIM: To analyze the causes of liver retransplantation (LRT), which mostly depend on recipient factors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A descriptive, observational, and unicentric study including patients who underwent an LRT in a tertiary medical center between April 2002 and December 2018. Recipient, donor, and liver transplant data were collected. RESULTS: During the period under review a total of 468 transplants were made; among them, 32 (6.8%) were LRT. The most common indication (25%) was hepatic artery thrombosis (HAT) developing ischemic cholangiopathy followed by chronic rejection (21.8%). Late LRT was performed in 71.8%. A total of 96.8% of donations were after brain death with a donor median age of 65 years. Six patients (18.7%) had HAT as a postoperative complication. The recipients' 3-, 6-, and 12-month overall survival was 72.7%, 54.6%, and 51.5%, respectively, and the 5-year was 46.8%. Leading cause of death was septic shock (42.1%). CONCLUSION: In our patients, the most common cause of LRT is HAT. We had an LRT rate of 6.8%, which is consistent with national and international registers.


Subject(s)
Hepatic Artery/surgery , Liver Transplantation/mortality , Postoperative Complications/surgery , Reoperation/mortality , Tissue Donors/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Aged , Female , Graft Survival , Humans , Liver Diseases/mortality , Liver Diseases/surgery , Liver Transplantation/methods , Male , Middle Aged , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Postoperative Complications/mortality , Reoperation/methods , Survival Rate , Tertiary Care Centers , Thrombosis/etiology , Thrombosis/mortality , Thrombosis/surgery
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...