ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Umbilical cord blood (UCB) banking is a well-established activity supporting the increasing number of UCB transplantations in haematological diseases. Our aim was to analyse the UCB characteristics of UCB units from preterm deliveries and compare them to full-term deliveries. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A prospective study in 194 preterm deliveries occurring at the La Fe University Hospital in Valencia was performed. Patients between 25 and 37 weeks of gestation were included. Those cases were compared to a full-term deliveries control group. RESULTS: The cases were grouped according to the gestational age: between 25 and 33 weeks (group 1), between 34 and 37 weeks (group 2) and between 38 and 42 weeks (group 3). Among obstetric variables, only arterial pH and maternal age variables were similar for all the groups. Higher CD34(+) cell counts were observed in the group 2, while the clonogenic efficiency was higher for the most preterm deliveries. DISCUSSION: UCB from deliveries of at least 34 weeks of gestation contain sufficient hematopoietic stem cell content for unrelated banking and transplantation, even containing higher CD34(+) cell content than UCB units from full-term deliveries. However, UCB from deliveries of less than 33 weeks' gestation contain only sufficient progenitors for children under 20 kg.
Subject(s)
Fetal Blood/physiology , Hematopoietic Stem Cells/physiology , Infant, Premature/blood , Adult , Antigens, CD34/blood , Cell Survival/physiology , Clone Cells , Erythroid Precursor Cells/physiology , Female , Flow Cytometry , Gestational Age , Granulocyte-Macrophage Progenitor Cells/physiology , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Myeloid Progenitor Cells/physiology , Pregnancy , Prospective Studies , Statistics, NonparametricABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Collection strategy is the first step for collecting good quality cord blood units. There are two main different techniques for collecting cord blood from the umbilical vein: in the delivery room while the placenta is still in the utero by midwifes and obstetricians, or in an adjacent room after placental delivery by cord blood bank trained personal. Our aim was to evaluate the benefits and disadvantages between the two different cord blood collection strategies in caesarean deliveries. METHODS: We retrospectively analysed data of cord blood units collected from caesarean deliveries for a 3-year period. Caesarean section was performed with a low uterine transversal incision in all patients according to common obstetrical practice. Cord blood collection was performed before or after placental delivery. RESULTS: Obstetrical and umbilical cord blood data was obtained from 253 caesarean deliveries. No statistically significant difference was observed for obstetrical variables or cord blood variables except for Hct and platelets. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude both methods produce comparable TNC, CD34 and CFU counts of cord blood units collected from caesarean sections. Before placental delivery collection avoids the financial investment that generates the presence of cord blood banking personal in the maternity ward.
