ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Oral decay prior to a hospital medical-surgical procedure is a risk factor for the development of postoperative complications. However, perioperative oral practices as a protective factor have not been studied. This review aims to evaluate the effectiveness of perioperative oral practices in the reduction of risk of developing postoperative complications in in-hospital medical surgical procedures. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This review and meta-analysis was conducted according to Cochrane guidelines. Medline, Scopus, Scielo, and Cochrane were consulted. Articles of the previous 10 years concerning adult patients undergoing perioperative oral practices prior to hospital medical-surgical procedures, were included. Data of the type of perioperative oral practice, type of postoperative complication and measures of effect on the development of complications were extracted. RESULTS: Of a pool of 1470 articles, 13 were included for systematic review and 10 for meta-analysis. The most common perioperative oral procedures were focalized approach (FA), referred to only the elimination of infectious foci in the oral cavity and comprehensive approach (CA), referred to a integral approach of the patient's oral health, both of which were mainly performed in oncologic surgeries, both were effective in the reduction of postoperative complications (RR=0.48, [95% CI 0.36 - 0.63]). The most reported postoperative complication was postoperative pneumonia. CONCLUSIONS: Perioperative oral management proved to be a protective factor against the development of postoperative complications.
Subject(s)
Hospitals , Postoperative Complications , Adult , Humans , Incidence , Length of Stay , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Postoperative Complications/prevention & controlABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The Human Papillomavirus (HPV) has different strategies for persist in the cells. This characteristic has led us to consider the presence of the virus in tissues of the oral cavity that had no clinical signs of infection. The aim of this study was to detect the presence of DNA-HPV at multiple sites of the oral cavity. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A case-control study was designed: Oral Squamous Carcinoma Group (OSCG), healthy n=72 and Control Group (CG), n=72, healthy volunteers paired by sex and age with OSCG. Four samples were taken from OSCG: saliva, biopsy, brush scraping of lesion and contralateral healthy side. In CG a saliva sample and a scratch of the posterior border of tongue were collected. HPV was detected by PCR using Bioneer Accuprep genomic DNA Extraction kit, and consensus primers MY09 and MY11. Chi square test was applied. RESULTS: 432 samples were obtained from 144 individuals. DNA-HPV was detected in 30 (42%) of OSCG subjects and 3(4%) of CG. Two or more positive samples were obtained in 67% of the OSCG, 67% in saliva and 60% in biopsy; in CG 100% of the individuals were positive in the two samples. CONCLUSIONS: HPV is frequently present in oral cavity as a multifocal infection, even without the presence of clinical lesions.
Subject(s)
Mouth Neoplasms , Papillomaviridae , Papillomavirus Infections , Case-Control Studies , DNA, Viral , HumansABSTRACT
UNLABELLED: The aim of the present study was to investigate diagnostic delay in oral cancer (OC) in two diagnosis centers in Córdoba, Argentina. Special attention was paid to the role of the patient and the professional in the diagnostic delay. METHODS: Seventy clinical records of patients with newly diagnosed oral squamous cell carcinoma were included. RESULTS: Both patients and professionals were responsible for the delay in diagnosis. This delay was longer for tumors in early stages. Multiple logistic regression analysis indicated that the professional delay was the most associated variable to the stage of tumor (P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Continuing education in OC and pre-cancerous lesions is important to reduce the professional delay. The findings of the present study also indicate that 58% of the patients are partially responsible for delay in the diagnosis of OC. Intensive public promotion and educational campaigns against OC are also needed to increase patient awareness.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/diagnosis , Mouth Neoplasms/diagnosis , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Argentina , Biopsy , Dental Staff, Hospital , Early Diagnosis , Female , Gingival Neoplasms/diagnosis , Humans , Lip Neoplasms/diagnosis , Male , Middle Aged , Mouth Floor/pathology , Neoplasm Staging , Patients , Retrospective Studies , Time Factors , Tongue Neoplasms/diagnosisABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Histoplasmosis is a granulomatous fungal disease caused by Histoplasma capsulatum. The objective of the present paper was to describe the prevalence of oral histoplasmosis (OH) in two services from an endemic area in Argentina between 1991 and 2002 and to compare the clinicopathological profile of OH between HIV-positive and HIV-negative patients. METHODS: About 733 HIV+ (group A) and 14 260 patients (group B) were examined. Clinical diagnosis was confirmed by cytology, biopsy or culture. RESULTS: About 21 (3%) and 10 (0.07%) cases of OH were diagnosed in group A and B respectively. Most patients were male. A total of 90% of patients in group A were <45 years old whereas 70% of group B were more than 45 years old. Palate, gingiva and oropharynx were the most frequent locations. The importance of including histoplasmosis in the differential diagnosis of ulcerated oral lesions in immunocompromised patients was discussed.
