Does intradialytic oral nutrition impact hemodialysis patients' quality of life, appetite, and safety? a pilot study of a crossover clinical trial / ¿La nutrición oral intradialítica impacta en la calidad de vida, el apetito y la seguridadde los pacientes en hemodiálisis? Estudio piloto de un ensayo clínico cruzado

Introduction: due to the catabolic characteristics of hemodialysis (HD), patients should consume foods or supplements during this treatment to meet their energy requirements and maintain a neutral nitrogen balance; however, there are some outcomes in which the effect of intradialytic oral nutrition (ION) is scarcely known. Objectives: this study aims to evaluate the effect of two types of ION (liquid and solid) on Quality of Life (QoL), appetite, and safety in HD patients. Methods: a pilot randomized, crossover clinical trial was performed in 18 patients on chronic HD. One group received ION for 18 HD sessions, after the crossover continued for 18 more sessions in the control group, and vice versa. We recorded QoL, appetite, systolic blood pressure (SBP), and intradialytic hypotension (IH) events. Results: clinical improvement was observed for most QoL components. Regardless of the consistency of supplementation, SBP increased to 4.10 mmHg. Both study groups reported a “very good-to-good” appetite. Conclusion: favorable clinical changes were observed in QoL scores during the study. Five of six IH events were reported for patients in the ION group, and SBP increased within the safe range (≤ 10 mmHg); appetite remained stable in both groups. Therefore, we concluded that this strategy, regardless of implementation consistency, is safe to be used in stable patients.(AU)

Introducción: debido a las características catabólicas de la hemodiálisis (HD), los pacientes deben consumir alimentos o suplementos durante este tratamiento para cubrir sus requerimientos energéticos y mantener un balance nitrogenado neutro; sin embargo, existen algunos desenlaces en los que el efecto de la nutrición oral intradialítica (NOID) es poco conocido.Objetivo: este estudio tiene como objetivo evaluar el efecto de dos tipos de NOID (líquido y sólido) sobre la calidad de vida, el apetito y la seguridad en pacientes en HD. Métodos: se realizó un estudio piloto en forma de ensayo clínico aleatorizado y cruzado con 18 pacientes en HD crónica. Un grupo recibió NOID durante 18 sesiones de HD, después del cruzamiento continuaron durante 18 sesiones más en el grupo de control, y viceversa. Se registraron la calidad de vida, el apetito, la presión arterial sistólica (PAS) y la hipotensión intradialítica (HI).Resultados: se observó mejoría clínica en la mayoría de los componentes de la calidad de vida. Independientemente de la consistencia de la suplementación, la PAS aumentó hasta 4,10 mmHg. Ambos grupos de estudio informaron de un apetito "muy bueno-bueno". Conclusiones: se observaron cambios clínicos favorables en las puntuaciones de calidad de vida durante el estudio. Cinco de seis eventos de HI se reportaron en pacientes del grupo de NOID y la PAS aumentó dentro del rango seguro (≤ 10 mmHg); el apetito se mantuvo estable en ambos grupos. Por lo tanto, se puede concluir que esta estrategia, independientemente de la consistencia implementada, es segura para ser utilizada en pacientes estables.(AU)

Does intradialytic oral nutrition impact hemodialysis patients' quality of life, appetite, and safety? A pilot study of a crossover clinical trial.

Introduction: Introduction: due to the catabolic characteristics of hemodialysis (HD), patients should consume foods or supplements during this treatment to meet their energy requirements and maintain a neutral nitrogen balance; however, there are some outcomes in which the effect of intradialytic oral nutrition (ION) is scarcely known. Objectives: this study aims to evaluate the effect of two types of ION (liquid and solid) on Quality of Life (QoL), appetite, and safety in HD patients. Methods: a pilot randomized, crossover clinical trial was performed in 18 patients on chronic HD. One group received ION for 18 HD sessions, after the crossover continued for 18 more sessions in the control group, and vice versa. We recorded QoL, appetite, systolic blood pressure (SBP), and intradialytic hypotension (IH) events. Results: clinical improvement was observed for most QoL components. Regardless of the consistency of supplementation, SBP increased to 4.10 mmHg. Both study groups reported a "very good-to-good" appetite. Conclusion: favorable clinical changes were observed in QoL scores during the study. Five of six IH events were reported for patients in the ION group, and SBP increased within the safe range (≤ 10 mmHg); appetite remained stable in both groups. Therefore, we concluded that this strategy, regardless of implementation consistency, is safe to be used in stable patients.

Introducción: Introducción: debido a las características catabólicas de la hemodiálisis (HD), los pacientes deben consumir alimentos o suplementos durante este tratamiento para cubrir sus requerimientos energéticos y mantener un balance nitrogenado neutro; sin embargo, existen algunos desenlaces en los que el efecto de la nutrición oral intradialítica (NOID) es poco conocido. Objetivo: este estudio tiene como objetivo evaluar el efecto de dos tipos de NOID (líquido y sólido) sobre la calidad de vida, el apetito y la seguridad en pacientes en HD. Métodos: se realizó un estudio piloto en forma de ensayo clínico aleatorizado y cruzado con 18 pacientes en HD crónica. Un grupo recibió NOID durante 18 sesiones de HD, después del cruzamiento continuaron durante 18 sesiones más en el grupo de control, y viceversa. Se registraron la calidad de vida, el apetito, la presión arterial sistólica (PAS) y la hipotensión intradialítica (HI). Resultados: se observó mejoría clínica en la mayoría de los componentes de la calidad de vida. Independientemente de la consistencia de la suplementación, la PAS aumentó hasta 4,10 mmHg. Ambos grupos de estudio informaron de un apetito "muy bueno-bueno". Conclusiones: se observaron cambios clínicos favorables en las puntuaciones de calidad de vida durante el estudio. Cinco de seis eventos de HI se reportaron en pacientes del grupo de NOID y la PAS aumentó dentro del rango seguro (≤ 10 mmHg); el apetito se mantuvo estable en ambos grupos. Por lo tanto, se puede concluir que esta estrategia, independientemente de la consistencia implementada, es segura para ser utilizada en pacientes estables.

Is intradialytic oral nutritional supplementation safe and effective on clinical outcomes? A systematic review with conventional meta-analysis and network meta-analysis.

AIM: determine the effect of intradialytic oral nutrition (ION) on clinical and safety outcomes. DESIGN: Systematic Review with conventional Meta-analysis, and a Network Meta-analysis (NMA) as sensitivity analysis. We searched on MEDLINE, LILACS, CENTRAL, and EMBASE in June 2020, and the last update was until August 2022. We selected observational and randomized controlled trials with ION for at least four weeks. Primary outcomes were all-cause mortality and quality of life (QoL); adverse events, physical performance, and appetite were secondary outcomes. RESULTS: Seven clinical trials and three observational studies were selected. Even when we did not obtain significant differences in physical performance and gastrointestinal symptoms, we identified a clinical improvement in the QoL's physical role, bodily pain, and physical performance domains. After pooling the data on mortality, a protection rate trend was observed in the ION group without statistical significance. The home-prepared ION was the best nutritional supplementation when assessing the appetite outcome through NMA. CONCLUSIONS: ION seems to have a protective trend in mortality risk; the current evidence is insufficient to establish a relationship with adverse events or other clinical outcomes. The lack of homogeneity in the trials makes it difficult to generalize these results. PROSPERO REGISTRATION: CRD42020186311.

Agreement between vector analysis and body composition measurements by four types of bioelectrical impedance technology in hemodialysis patients.

Introduction: Background: the differences in bioelectrical impedance vector analysis (BIVA) results from different analyzers that use different bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) measurement technologies are not known. This study aimed to identify the degree of agreement between the BIVA results of four different BIA measurement techniques and to evaluate the degree of agreement between their estimates of fat-free mass (FFM) and fat mass (FM) and those determined by the gold-standard method of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) in a subgroup of patients without overhydration. Methods: a cross-sectional study was conducted with hemodialysis (HD) patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) aged 18 to 65 years. BIA was measured with four different techniques: spectroscopic (BIA-BIS), multifrequency (BIA-MF), single-frequency (BIA-SF), and segmental multifrequency (BIA-MS) techniques. The differences and concordance between the components of the BIA (resistance, reactance, and phase angle) of the four devices were analyzed. Patients with a normal hydration status were identified, and concordance between FM and FFM measurements with each impedance device and DEXA was observed only in these patients. Results: thirty patients were included. The concordance between the components of BIA ranged from good to excellent (phase angle: intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) = 0.82, 95 % confidence interval (CI): 0.77-0.93; resistance: ICC = 0.98, 95 % CI: 0.92-0.99). The overall concordance for BIVA diagnosis between the analyzers was substantial for hydration (k = 0.71, 95 % CI: 0.71-0.72) and for body tissues (k = 0.68, 95 % CI: 0.67-0.68). Bland-Altman plots showed the lowest bias between BIA-BIS and DEXA for both FM and FFM. Conclusions: the agreement among the four devices was good for diagnosis by BIVA. The BIA-BIS analyzer and DEXA had the lowest bias for both FFM and FM, although with higher limits of agreement. The lowest limits of agreement were found with the BIA-MS analyzer.

Introducción: Antecedentes: se desconoce si existen diferencias en el diagnóstico dado por el análisis de vectores de impedancia bioeléctrica (BIVA por sus siglas en inglés) entre los analizadores que utilizan distintas tecnologías de medición de impedancia bioeléctrica (IBE). Este estudio tuvo como objetivo identificar el grado de concordancia entre el diagnóstico por BIVA de cuatro técnicas diferentes de medición de IBE, así como evaluar el grado de concordancia entre sus estimaciones de masa magra (MM) y masa grasa (MG) en comparación con el método de absorciometría de rayos X de energía dual (DEXA) en un subgrupo de pacientes sin sobrecarga de volumen. Métodos: se realizó un estudio transversal en pacientes con enfermedad renal crónica avanzada (ERCA) en hemodiálisis (HD) con edades entre los 18 a 65 años. La IBE se midió con cuatro diferentes tecnologías: espectroscópica (IBE-BIS), multifrecuencia (IBE-MF), una sola frecuencia (IBE-SF) y multifrecuencia segmental (IBE-MS). Se analizaron las diferencias y concordancias entre los componentes de la IBE (resistencia, reactancia y ángulo de fase) de los cuatro analizadores. Se identificaron pacientes con estado de hidratación normal, y solo en ellos se evaluó la concordancia de FFM y FM entre cada analizador de impedancia y DEXA. Resultados: se incluyeron 30 pacientes. La concordancia entre los componentes del IBE varió de buena a excelente (ángulo de fase: coeficiente de correlación intraclase (ICC) = 0,82, IC del 95 %: 0,77-0,93; resistencia: ICC = 0,98, IC del 95 %: 0,92-0,99). La concordancia general en el diagnóstico de BIVA entre los analizadores fue substancial para la hidratación (k = 0,71, IC del 95 %: 0,71-0,72) y los tejidos corporales (k = 0,68, IC del 95 %: 0,67-0,68). Los gráficos de Bland-Altman mostraron un sesgo más bajo entre BIA-BIS y DEXA tanto para FM como para FFM. Conclusiones: la concordancia entre el diagnóstico por BIVA, entre los cuatro dispositivos, fue sunstancial. El analizador BIA-BIS y DEXA mostraron los sesgos más bajos, tanto para FFM como para FM, aunque con límites de concordancia más altos. Los límites más bajos de concordancia se encontraron con el analizador BIA-MS.

Agreement between vector analysis and body composition measurements by four types of bioelectrical impedance technology in hemodialysis patients / Concordancia del análisis vectorial y medidas de composición corporal de cuatro tipos de tecnología de impedancia bioeléctrica en pacientes en hemodiálisis

Background: the differences in bioelectrical impedance vector analysis (BIVA) results from different analyzers that use different bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) measurement technologies are not known. This study aimed to identify the degree of agreement between the BIVA results of four different BIA measurement techniques and to evaluate the degree of agreement between their estimates of fat-free mass (FFM) and fat mass (FM) and those determined by the gold-standard method of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) in a subgroup of patients without overhydration. Methods: a cross-sectional study was conducted with hemodialysis (HD) patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) aged 18 to 65 years. BIA was measured with four different techniques: spectroscopic (BIA-BIS), multifrequency (BIA-MF), single-frequency (BIA-SF), and segmental multifrequency (BIA-MS) techniques. The differences and concordance between the components of the BIA (resistance, reactance, and phase angle) of the four devices were analyzed. Patients with a normal hydration status were identified, and concordance between FM and FFM measurements with each impedance device and DEXA was observed only in these patients. Results: thirty patients were included. The concordance between the components of BIA ranged from good to excellent (phase angle: intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) = 0.82, 95 % confidence interval (CI): 0.77-0.93; resistance: ICC = 0.98, 95 % CI: 0.92-0.99). The overall concordance for BIVA diagnosis between the analyzers was substantial for hydration (k = 0.71, 95 % CI: 0.71-0.72) and for body tissues (k = 0.68, 95 % CI: 0.67-0.68). Bland–Altman plots showed the lowest bias between BIA-BIS and DEXA for both FM and FFM. (AU)

Antecedentes: se desconoce si existen diferencias en el diagnóstico dado por el análisis de vectores de impedancia bioeléctrica (BIVA por sus siglas en inglés) entre los analizadores que utilizan distintas tecnologías de medición de impedancia bioeléctrica (IBE). Este estudio tuvo como objetivo identificar el grado de concordancia entre el diagnóstico por BIVA de cuatro técnicas diferentes de medición de IBE, así como evaluar el grado de concordancia entre sus estimaciones de masa magra (MM) y masa grasa (MG) en comparación con el método de absorciometría de rayos X de energía dual (DEXA) en un subgrupo de pacientes sin sobrecarga de volumen. Métodos: se realizó un estudio transversal en pacientes con enfermedad renal crónica avanzada (ERCA) en hemodiálisis (HD) con edades entre los 18 a 65 años. La IBE se midió con cuatro diferentes tecnologías: espectroscópica (IBE-BIS), multifrecuencia (IBE-MF), una sola frecuencia (IBE-SF) y multifrecuencia segmental (IBE-MS). Se analizaron las diferencias y concordancias entre los componentes de la IBE (resistencia, reactancia y ángulo de fase) de los cuatro analizadores. Se identificaron pacientes con estado de hidratación normal, y solo en ellos se evaluó la concordancia de FFM y FM entre cada analizador de impedancia y DEXA. Resultados: se incluyeron 30 pacientes. La concordancia entre los componentes del IBE varió de buena a excelente (ángulo de fase: coeficiente de correlación intraclase (ICC) = 0,82, IC del 95 %: 0,77-0,93; resistencia: ICC = 0,98, IC del 95 %: 0,92-0,99). La concordancia general en el diagnóstico de BIVA entre los analizadores fue substancial para la hidratación (k = 0,71, IC del 95 %: 0,71-0,72) y los tejidos corporales (k = 0,68, IC del 95 %: 0,67-0,68). Los gráficos de Bland-Altman mostraron un sesgo más bajo entre BIA-BIS y DEXA tanto para FM como para FFM. (AU)

Nutritional Status and Other Clinical Variables Are Associated to the Resting Energy Expenditure in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease: A Validity Study.

Background: Estimating energy requirements (ER) is crucial for nutritional attention to chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients. Current guidelines recommend measuring ER with indirect calorimetry (IC) when possible. Due to clinical settings, the use of simple formulas is preferred. Few studies have modeled equations for estimating ER for CKD. Nevertheless, variables of interest such as nutritional status and strength have not been explored in these models. This study aimed to develop and validate a model for estimating REE in patients with CKD stages 3-5, who were not receiving renal replacement therapy (RTT), using clinical variables and comparing it with indirect calorimetry as the gold standard. Methods: In this study 80 patients with CKD participated. Indirect calorimetry (IC) was performed in all patients. The calorimeter analyzed metabolic measurements every minute for 15 min after autocalibration with barometric pressure, temperature, and humidity. Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis (BIA) was performed. Fat-free mass (FFM) was registered among other bioelectrical components. Handgrip strength (HGS) was evaluated and an average of 3 repetitions was recorded. Nutritional status was assessed with the subjective global assessment (SGA). Patients categorized as B or C were then considered as having malnutrition. Results: We analyzed 71 patients and 3 models were generated. Model 1a included FFM; Model 2a included weight; Model 3c included handgrip strength (HGS). All other variables were stepwise, computer-selected with a p < 0.01 significance level; Malnutrition was consistently associated with ER among other clinical variables in all models (p < 0.05). The model that included BIA-FFM had R 2 adjusted = 0.46, while the model that included weight (Kg) had an adjusted R 2 adjusted = 0.44. The models had moderate concordance, LC = 0.60-0.65 with the gold standard, whereas other energy expenditure estimation equations had LC = 0.36 and 0.55 with indirect calorimetry. Using these previously validated equations as a reference, our models had concordance values ranging from 0.66 to 0.80 with them. Conclusion: Models incorporating nutritional status and other clinical variables such as weight, FFM, comorbidities, gender, and age have a moderate agreement with REE. The agreement between our models and others previously validated for the CKD patient is good; however, the agreement between the latter and IC measurements is moderate. The KDOQI lowest recommendation (25 Kcals/kg body weight) considering the 22% difference with respect to the IC for total energy expenditure rather than for REE.

Is there a relationship between oral hygiene and nutritional status in peritoneal dialysis patients?

Introduction: Brackground: in the early stages of kidney disease, oral manifestations (gingivitis and periodontitis) may cause premature tooth loss and limit food intake. There is scarce evidence of the relationship of oral hygiene and nutritional status in patients on Peritoneal Dialysis (PD). Objective: we aimed to assess the relationship of oral hygiene with nutritional, clinical, and physical performance parameters in PD patients. Methods: this cross-sectional study included outpatients aged 34-69 years. Oral health questionnaire, nutritional, functional, and clinical assessment tools such as Malnutrition Inflammation Score (MIS), Subjective Global Assessment (SGA), handgrip strength, and Gastrointestinal Symptoms Questionnaire (GSQ) were applied. Patients were divided according to debris, calculus, and Simplified Oral Hygiene Index (OHI-S) in two groups: "clean-slightly dirty" and "dirty-very dirty". Results: in total, 41 patients were included, those in the "dirty-very dirty" group had a worse nutritional status with higher scores on the MIS tool and worse nutritional diagnosis with SGA as compared to the "clean-slightly dirty" group. The handgrip strength was higher in patients in the best category of oral hygiene, and those with the worst hygiene presented greater severity of gastrointestinal symptoms. The risks of malnutrition in the three indices of oral hygiene with the worst category were statistically significant. Conclusion: poor oral hygiene was associated with poorer nutritional status, lower handgrip, and worse GSQ. Poor oral hygiene might be related to persistent inflammation status and catabolism that favored protein-energy wasting.

Introducción: Introducción: en las primeras etapas de la enfermedad renal, las manifestaciones orales (gingivitis y periodontitis) pueden causar la pérdida de dientes prematura y limitar la ingestión de los alimentos. Existe poca evidencia de la relación entre la higiene bucal y el estado de nutrición en los pacientes con Diálisis Peritoneal (PD). Objetivos: evaluar la relación de la higiene bucal con los parámetros nutricionales, clínicos y de funcionalidad física en pacientes con DP. Métodos: este es un estudio transversal que incluyó a pacientes ambulatorios de 34 a 69 años. Se aplicó un cuestionario de salud bucal, herramientas de evaluación nutricional, pruebas de funcionalidad y un cuestionario de síntomas gastrointestinales, con las herramientas MIS (Malnutrition Inflammation Score), SGA (Subjective Global Assessment); fuerza de prensión de mano y el cuestionario de síntomas gastrointestinales GSQ (Gastrointestinal Score Questionnaire). Los pacientes fueron agrupados de acuerdo con los índices de placa, cálculo y OHI-S (Simplified Oral Hygiene Index) en dos grupos: "limpio-ligeramente sucio" y "sucio-muy sucio". Resultados: se incluyeron 41 pacientes en total, aquellos en el grupo "sucio-muy sucio" presentaron un peor estado nutricional con mayores puntajes de la herramienta MIS y peor diagnóstico nutricional con la SGA comparado con el grupo "limpio-ligeramente sucio". La fuerza de prensión de mano fue mayor en los pacientes con la mejor categoría de higiene bucal, y aquellos con peor higiene presentaron mayor gravedad de síntomas gastrointestinales. El riesgo de desnutrición en los tres índices de higiene bucal con la peor categoría fueron estadísticamente significativos. Conclusiones: la mala higiene bucal se asoció con un peor estado nutricional, menor fuerza de prensión de la mano y peor GSQ. Una higiene bucal deficiente podría estar relacionada con un estado de inflamación y catabolismo persistentes favoreciendo el desgaste proteínico energético en pacientes en diálisis peritoneal.

Frequency of Intradialytic Hypotension Events Do Not Increase with Oral Nutritional Supplementation during Hemodialysis Treatment: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the effect of the use of a renal-specific oral nutritional supplement (RS-ONS) during hemodialysis sessions and the use of RS-ONS at home on the incidence of intradialytic hypotension. METHODS: A single-center, 12-week, open-label, randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted. The intervention was a RN-ONS divided into two portions: 100 and 137 mL. The first portion was given after 1 hour of hemodialysis (HD) treatment, while the second portion was given 45 minutes before the end of HD. The research staff registered the baseline and final nutritional parameters and systolic arterial pressure (SAP) from the screen of the HD device during 36 HD sessions. Hypotension symptoms were also recorded every hour during each HD session. The nutritional and functional status was also assessed. RESULTS: We registered a total of 16 hypotensive events during 1082 HD sessions: 9 were in patients supplemented at home (551 HD sessions) and 7 occurred in patients supplemented during HD P = .668. Incidence of intradialytic hypotension (IH) during 1082 HD sessions was 1.4%. The total malnutrition inflammation score (MIS) decreased in both groups (P < .01), and the percentage of cachexia improved in the supplemented-during-HD group (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: In this randomized controlled trial, intradialytic hypotension events did not increase with the RS-ONS during HD treatment. This strategy appears to be a safe anabolic nutritional strategy for the prevention of PEW, selecting stable patients and administering a fractioned volume of the supplement after the first hour of HD treatment. More studies with larger samples size are required to confirm these findings.