Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Res Vet Sci ; 145: 21-28, 2022 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35149381

ABSTRACT

Humic acids (HA) have been evaluated as growth promoters in poultry, but their effects on the gut microbiota remains controversial using in vitro and in vivo models. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of HA extracted from a wormcompost on the recovery of bacteria: Salmonella Enteritidis (S. Enteritidis), Escherichia coli (E. coli), Clostridium perfringens (C. perfringens), Bacillus subtilis (B. subtilis) and Lactobacillus salivarius (L. salivarius) using an in vitro chicken digestive system. Independent in vitro trials were run for each bacteria using six treatments: 1) Negative control with no bacteria added (Control-), 2) Positive control added with bacteria (Control+), 3) 0.1% HA + bacteria, 4) 0.2% HA + bacteria, 5) 0.5% HA + bacteria and 6) 1% HA + bacteria. Data was subjected to analysis of variance and linear regression. In the crop, S. Enteritidis was lower, C. perfringes and B. subtilis were not affected by HA, while E. coli and L. salivarius were higher at 0.5 and 1% HA inclusion (P ≤ 0.0001). In the proventriculus, S. Enteritidis, E. coli and B. subtilis were higher at 0.5 and 1% HA inclusion (P ≤ 0.0001); C. perfringens and L. salivarius were not affected by HA. In intestine, significant increases of all bacteria strains were observed (P ≤ 0.0001). In conclusion, the results suggests that HA can be used as prebiotic, but their mechanisms of action to stimulate the growth of gut bacteria remains to be elucidated.


Subject(s)
Poultry Diseases , Probiotics , Animals , Bacillus subtilis , Chickens/microbiology , Escherichia coli , Humic Substances , Poultry Diseases/microbiology
2.
Animals (Basel) ; 11(11)2021 Nov 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34827930

ABSTRACT

Different sources and inclusion levels of humic substances (HS) have been tested in broiler rations as an alternative to the addition of growth promoter antibiotics (GPA) with promising results. The current study was carried out to assess the influence of HS extracted from worm compost on broiler production parameters, carcass yield, tibia characteristics, lactic acid bacteria (LAB) counts, excretion of Eimeria oocysts, and antioxidant status of breast meat. A total of 1200 broilers were used, housed in groups of 30 per pen, and assigned to five treatments: 1 = basal diet with GPA (positive control), 2 = basal diet without GPA (negative control), 3-5 = basal diet with 0.15, 0.30, and 0.45% HS, respectively. The data was subjected to a variance analysis and orthogonal contrasts. The FI decreased linearly (p < 0.05) from 1-14, 29-42, and 1-42 days as the inclusion of HS in the feed increased. The FCR had quadratic responses (p < 0.01) from 29-42 and 1-42 days concerning the HS inclusion levels. Lactic acid bacteria was higher (p ˂ 0.05) in ten-day-old chicks with 0.45% HS in the diet. The 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl radical scavenging activity antioxidant potential decreased linearly (p < 0.05) concerning increasing HS in the feed. The results indicate that HS can be used as growth promoters in broiler feeds.

3.
Animals (Basel) ; 9(12)2019 Dec 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31835365

ABSTRACT

Humic substances (HS) from different sources have been evaluated to replace or reduce the use of growth promoter antibiotics (GPA) in the feeds of broiler chickens. The objective was to evaluate the growth performance, tibia measurements, nutrient balance, meat quality, and microbiological status of broiler fed with an HS extract (EHS) under ad libitum (ADLIB) or feed restriction (REST). Individually caged broilers (n = 180, 14-35 day of age) were assigned to a factorial arrangement of three dietary treatments: (1) positive control with bacitracin methylene disalicylate (BMD) and salinomycin; (2) negative control without BMD nor salinomycin, and (3) same as negative control with 0.25% EHS, and two feeding regimens 1) ADLIB or REST for 24 h on d 1, 7, and 14. Results were subjected to ANOVA. Positive control and EHS-fed broilers showed higher carcass yield (p < 0.05) and lower oocyst excretion (p < 0.01) compared to negative control birds. Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) and Clostridium perfringens (C. perfringens) were higher in negative control and EHS-broilers compared to positive control (p < 0.01). In conclusion, higher carcass yield, lower C. perfringens and oocyst excretion were found in positive control and higher carcass yield, higher LAB and lower oocyst excretion were found in EHS-fed broilers. Broilers subjected to REST had reduced growth performance and meat quality. In conclusion, EHS could be used to increase the carcass yield and beneficial LAB in broilers.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...