ABSTRACT
La revolución de la biología molecular y el desarrollo de la investigación biomédica básica para el diagnóstico y posterior manejo del cáncer infantil han llevado a la necesidad de organización de grupos interdisciplinarios de profesionales, los cuales se encargan de afrontar los nuevos desafíos diagnósticos y terapéuticos. Los sarcomas indiferenciados pediátricos constituyen un grupo heterogéneo de neoplasias malignas de aspecto primitivo y polifenotípico. La categorización de gran parte de este tipo de tumores es posible gracias a la aplicación de técnicas moleculares complementarias al estudio histopatológico. El objetivo del presente estudio fue recategorizar sarcomas indiferenciados mediante la implementación de una nueva metodología diagnóstica. Se efectuaron técnicas de inmunohistoquimica (IHQ), FISH de interfase y RT-PCR a partir de tejido fijado en formol e incluido en parafina en 144 casos de sarcomas indiferenciados. Se logró la recategorización del 95.1% de los casos, arribando a 24 diagnósticos diferentes. Sólo un 4.9% permanece aún como sarcoma indiferenciado o inclasificable. Los resultados alcanzados por este estudio demuestran la importancia de contar con nuevas herramientas diagnósticas a nivel molecular y recursos humanos especializados que posibiliten su correcta implementación para el diagnóstico de neoplasias de difícil caracterización (AU)
The revolution of molecular biology and the development of basic medical research for the diagnosis and subsequent management of childhood cancer have led to a need to organize interdisciplinary groups of professionals in charge of facing new diagnostic and treatment challenges. Childhood undifferentiated sarcomas are a heterogeneous group of malignant neoplasms that are primitive in appearance and have polyphenotypic features. Categorization of a large part of this type of tumor has become possible with molecular techniques as a complement to histopathological studies. The aim of this study was to categorize undifferentiated sarcomas using new diagnostic tools. Immunohistochemistry (IHC), interfase FISH, and RT-PCR techniques were used on formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded tissues of 144 cases of undifferentiated sarcomas. Overall, 95.1% of the cases could be recategorized resulting in 24 different diagnoses. In only 4.9% the diagnosis of undifferentiated or unclassifiable sarcoma was maintained. These results emphasize the importance of the availability of new diagnostic tools at the molecular level and specialized human resources enabling adequate implementation for the diagnosis of difficult-to-characterize neoplasms (AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Infant , Child, Preschool , Child , Adolescent , Sarcoma/classification , Sarcoma/diagnosis , Sarcoma/pathology , Immunohistochemistry/methods , In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence/methods , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , Retrospective Studies , Molecular Diagnostic Techniques/methods , Diagnosis, DifferentialABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Differences in incidence and survival in osteosarcoma reports are considerable worldwide. PURPOSE: This study describes the incidence and survival of patients with osteosarcoma in Argentina with data from the National Pediatric Cancer Registry (ROHA), and the impact of age, gender, stage, regional, and socioeconomic indicators on outcome. METHODS: Pediatric patients with osteosarcoma reported to ROHA from 2000 through 2013 were analyzed, the annual age-standardized incidence rate (ASR) was calculated using the National Vital Statistics, and survival was estimated. The extended human development index (EHDI) for each reporting region was used as an indicator of socioeconomic status. RESULTS: There were 515 cases of osteosarcoma identified, yielding an ASR of 3.2/1,000,000 children (0-14 years old). The ASR did not vary significantly by year of diagnosis but ranged from 4.0/1,000,000 in the Cuyo/Western Central region to 2.7/1,000,000 in the northeast region (P < 0.000). The estimated 5-year survival rate was 45% (95% confidence interval [CI] 44-51%), with no difference by sex, diagnosis year, region, or EHDI score (P > 0.1 in all cases). Survival rate for localized disease was 52% (95% CI 45-57%) and for metastatic 22% (95% CI 15-30%). CONCLUSIONS: In Argentina, ASR of osteosarcoma is similar to that in high-income countries, but survival is lower in all regions. Future work will focus on identification and reduction of causes of preventable treatment failure.