Antithrombotic Treatment for Stroke Prevention in Cervical Artery Dissection: The STOP-CAD Study.

BACKGROUND: Small, randomized trials of patients with cervical artery dissection showed conflicting results regarding optimal stroke prevention strategies. We aimed to compare outcomes in patients with cervical artery dissection treated with antiplatelets versus anticoagulation. METHODS: This is a multicenter observational retrospective international study (16 countries, 63 sites) that included patients with cervical artery dissection without major trauma. The exposure was antithrombotic treatment type (anticoagulation versus antiplatelets), and outcomes were subsequent ischemic stroke and major hemorrhage (intracranial or extracranial hemorrhage). We used adjusted Cox regression with inverse probability of treatment weighting to determine associations between anticoagulation and study outcomes within 30 and 180 days. The main analysis used an as-treated crossover approach and only included outcomes occurring with the above treatments. RESULTS: The study included 3636 patients (402 [11.1%] received exclusively anticoagulation and 2453 [67.5%] received exclusively antiplatelets). By day 180, there were 162 new ischemic strokes (4.4%) and 28 major hemorrhages (0.8%); 87.0% of ischemic strokes occurred by day 30. In adjusted Cox regression with inverse probability of treatment weighting, compared with antiplatelet therapy, anticoagulation was associated with a nonsignificantly lower risk of subsequent ischemic stroke by day 30 (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.71 [95% CI, 0.45-1.12]; P=0.145) and by day 180 (adjusted HR, 0.80 [95% CI, 0.28-2.24]; P=0.670). Anticoagulation therapy was not associated with a higher risk of major hemorrhage by day 30 (adjusted HR, 1.39 [95% CI, 0.35-5.45]; P=0.637) but was by day 180 (adjusted HR, 5.56 [95% CI, 1.53-20.13]; P=0.009). In interaction analyses, patients with occlusive dissection had significantly lower ischemic stroke risk with anticoagulation (adjusted HR, 0.40 [95% CI, 0.18-0.88]; Pinteraction=0.009). CONCLUSIONS: Our study does not rule out the benefit of anticoagulation in reducing ischemic stroke risk, particularly in patients with occlusive dissection. If anticoagulation is chosen, it seems reasonable to switch to antiplatelet therapy before 180 days to lower the risk of major bleeding. Large prospective studies are needed to validate our findings.

Immunohistochemical Expression of Ki-67, Dopamine D1 and Dopamine D2 Receptors in Meningiomas in a Tertiary Institution in Mexico.

Objectives Meningiomas (MNGs) are the most common intracranial tumors found in the adult population. While most intracranial MNGs may be surgically removed, a subset of patients remains ineligible for conventional treatment. This is either because of a lack of surgical access or due to atypical, anaplastic or invasive characteristics of the tumors. These patients may benefit from targeted therapies that focus on cell receptor expression. The aim of this study was to assess dopamine receptor (DR) and Ki-67 expression in the MGNs of patients treated with surgery in the Instituto Nacional de Neurología y Neurocirugía, Mexico. Materials and methods This study analyzed 23 patients with confirmed MNG diagnoses (10 female and 13 male (mean age: 44.5 years)) who had undergone surgical resection between 2010 and 2014 at our institution. In the collected samples, we performed analyses for Ki-67, Dopamine 1 and Dopamine 2 receptors' expression. Results For the markers Ki-67, DR-D1 and DR-D2, the mean percentual expressions were 18.9%, 23.02% and 8.33%. No significant correlation was found between the expressions of these receptors and the studied MNG characteristics. The expression index of Ki-67 showed a significant relation with mean age (p = 0.03) and prolactin levels (p = 0.02). Conclusions Samples showed varied expressions of the studied receptors. Despite the difference in expressions between the markers, more studies are needed to confirm the findings. In contrast to previous studies, we could not find any relationship between D2-R and tumor characteristics.

Persistent trigeminal artery associated with an occipital arteriovenous malformation: a case report and literature review.

BACKGROUND: Persistent trigeminal artery or persistent primitive trigeminal artery (PTA) is the most common carotid-basilar anastomosis in both cadaveric and live patient studies, followed by persistent hypoglossal and persistent otic arteries. Approximately 0.2% of all angiographies reported this finding. CASE REPORT: We present the case of a 21-year-old male who arrived at the emergency department with tonic‒clonic seizures. After performing diagnostic contrast magnetic resonance imaging and digital subtraction angiography, the patient was diagnosed with a right occipital arteriovenous malformations (AVM) fed by the right calcarine artery associated with an ipsilateral PTA. After considering surgical and endovascular treatment options, the patient was selected for watchful waiting. We included a literature review of the PTA, the results of a PubMed search regarding the combined presence of these findings, and a brief discussion providing insight into the implications for treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Although several studies have linked PTA to different vascular pathologies, such as cerebral aneurysms, the association between PTA and AVMs remains scarce. This case, along with the literature review, shows that further research is needed to characterize the relationship between these findings.

Stroke Among SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine Recipients in Mexico: A Nationwide Descriptive Study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Information on stroke among severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccines remains scarce. We report stroke incidence as an adverse event following immunization (AEFI) among recipients of 79,399,446 doses of 6 different SARS-CoV-2 vaccines (BNT162b2, ChAdOx1 nCov-19, Gam-COVID-Vac, CoronaVac, Ad5-nCoV, and Ad26.COV2-S) between December 24, 2020, and August 31, 2021, in Mexico. METHODS: This retrospective descriptive study analyzed stroke incidence per million doses among hospitalized adult patients (≥18 years) during an 8-month interval. According to the World Health Organization, AEFIs were defined as clinical events occurring within 30 days after immunization and categorized as either nonserious or serious, depending on severity, treatment, and hospital admission requirements. Acute ischemic stroke (AIS), intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), and cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT) cases were collected through a passive epidemiologic surveillance system in which local health providers report potential AEFI to the Mexican General Board of Epidemiology. Data were captured with standardized case report formats by an ad hoc committee appointed by the Mexican Ministry of Health to evaluate potential neurologic AEFI against SARS-COV-2. RESULTS: We included 56 patients (31 female patients [55.5%]) for an overall incidence of 0.71 cases per 1,000,000 administered doses (95% CI 0.54-0.92). Median age was 65 years (interquartile range [IQR] 55-76 years); median time from vaccination to stroke (of any subtype) was 2 days (IQR 1-5 days). In 27 (48.2%) patients, the event was diagnosed within the first 24 hours after immunization. The most frequent subtype was AIS in 43 patients (75%; 0.54 per 1,000,000 doses, 95% CI 0.40-0.73), followed by ICH in 9 (16.1%; 0.11 per 1,000,000 doses, 95% CI 0.06-0.22) and SAH and CVT, each with 2 cases (3.6%; 0.03 per 1,000,000 doses, 95% CI 0.01-0.09). Overall, the most common risk factors were hypertension in 33 (58.9%) patients and diabetes in 22 (39.3%). Median hospital length of stay was 6 days (IQR 4-13 days). At discharge, functional outcome was good (modified Rankin Scale score 0-2) in 41.1% of patients; in-hospital mortality rate was 21.4%. DISCUSSION: Stroke is an exceedingly rare AEFI against SARS-CoV-2. Preexisting stroke risk factors were identified in most patients. Further research is needed to evaluate causal associations between SARS-COV-2 vaccines and stroke.