ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The main treatments for hydrocephalus due to posterior fossa tumors are tumor resection with or without an external ventricular drain, ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS), and endoscopic third ventriculostomy. Although preoperative cerebrospinal fluid diversion by any of these techniques improves clinical outcomes, evidence comparing the efficacy of these techniques is scarce. Therefore, we aimed to retrospectively evaluate each treatment modality. METHODS: This single-center study analyzed 55 patients. Treatments were classified as successful (hydrocephalus resolution with a single surgical event) or failed and compared with a χ2 test. Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests were employed. A Cox proportional hazard model was used to determine relevant covariates predicting outcomes. RESULTS: Mean patient age was 36.3 years, 43.4% of patients were men, and 50.9% of patients presented with uncompensated intracranial hypertension. Mean tumor volume was 33.4 cm3, and extent of resection was 90.85%. Tumor resection with or without an external ventricular drain was successful in 58.82% of cases, VPS was successful in 100%, and endoscopic third ventriculostomy was successful in 76.19% (P = 0.014). Mean follow-up time was 15.12 months. Log-rank test found statistically significant differences between survival curves of treatments (P = 0.016) favoring the VPS group. Postoperative surgical site hematoma was a significant covariate in the Cox model (hazard ratio = 17; 95% confidence ratio, 2.301-81.872; P = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: This study favored VPS as the most reliable treatment of hydrocephalus due to posterior fossa tumors in adult patient; however, several factors influence clinical outcomes. We proposed an algorithm based on our findings and other authors' findings to facilitate the decision-making process.
