Diagnosis of Alternaria alternata sensitization with natural and recombinant Alt a 1 allergens.

BACKGROUND: Diagnosis of Alternaria alternata sensitization is hampered by the variability and complexity of fungal extracts, and thus simplification of the diagnostic procedures with purified allergens should be pursued. OBJECTIVE: We sought to compare A alternata extract and purified natural Alt a 1 (nAlt a 1) and recombinant Alt a 1 (rAlt a 1) allergens for their diagnostic value. METHODS: Forty-two patients allergic to A alternata , 10 atopic patients with negative skin prick test responses to A alternata extract, and 10 healthy subjects were investigated. Skin prick tests and determination of specific IgE levels were performed with nAlt a 1 and 2 different types of rAlt a 1: rbAlt a 1, expressed in Escherichia coli , and ryAlt a 1, expressed in the yeast Yarrowia lipolytica . RESULTS: Prevalence for Alt a 1, Alt a 2, and Alt a 11 by IgE dot-blot testing was 98%, 0%, and 15%, respectively, and therefore Alt a 1 was used as a marker for A alternata sensitization. Immunoblotting and inhibition analysis showed no IgE-binding differences between nAlt a 1 and rAlt a 1. The whole group of patients with allergy to A alternata had positive skin test reactions to purified allergens at 100 microg/mL, whereas no false-positive reactions were detected. Natural or ryAlt a 1 elicited a similar response in skin tests compared with A alternata extract, although a reduced reactivity was observed with rbAlt a 1. Specific IgE levels to nAlt a 1 or rAlt a 1 showed significant correlation and similar sensitivity and specificity. CONCLUSIONS: Alt a 1, either in its natural or recombinant form, is sufficient for a reliable diagnosis of A alternata sensitization and induces skin prick reactivity comparable with that produced by A alternata extract.

Safety of the new selective cyclooxygenase type 2 inhibitors rofecoxib and celecoxib in patients with anaphylactoid reactions to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.

BACKGROUND: Controlled oral challenge with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) is the only definite way to detect safe NSAIDs in patients with NSAID-induced anaphylactoid reactions. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety of the selective cyclooxygenase (COX) type 2 inhibitors rofecoxib and celecoxib in patients with single-reactive, NSAID-induced anaphylactoid reactions. METHODS: We prospectively conducted single-blind, placebo-controlled oral challenges (SBPCOCs) with rofecoxib and celecoxib in 33 patients with single-reactive, NSAID-induced anaphylactoid reactions. RESULTS: Nineteen women and 14 men (age range, 20-78 years; mean age, 44.8 years) exhibited anaphylactoid reactions on emergency department admission. Symptoms involved the skin (100%), laryngeal edema (73%), systolic hypotension (39%), and the gastrointestinal system (15%). The NSAIDs most frequently involved in the episodes were dipyrone (64%), propyphenazone (12%), and diclofenac (12%). In all patients, tolerance to a potent, nondiscriminatory COX inhibitor (except those reported as being responsible for the reaction) was noted. The SBPCOCs with the selective COX-2 inhibitors celecoxib and rofecoxib were well tolerated in all cases. Twenty-three patients who had an anaphylactoid reaction involving dipyrone and propyphenazone showed good tolerance to celecoxib (which contains a pyrazole group in its structure) on challenge. CONCLUSIONS: The SBPCOCs with highly selective COX-2 inhibitors were safe in patients with single-reactive, NSAID-induced anaphylactoid reactions, even in cases that involved pyrazole derivatives.